Originally Posted by RonE
Because he plays Hewitt. If you discount the 2006 Australian Open, in every single grand slam Hewitt has played in since and including the 2004 AO, the man who beat him went on to win the title.
That's right. Another ominous sign.
Kiefer is already out of the tournament which means Fed doesn't get to beat him in four sets.
No Kiefer-four-setter, no slam for Fed.
(Unless Fed gets to play Hewitt in the final.