Originally Posted by IvanLjubicic
He said even if he had won the 2nd set he would of retired anyways then why did he say he was dissapointed that the trainer couldnt work on him in the 3rd.He then went on to say if the trainer would of been able to tape his ankle that he would of felt more comfortable and continued playing. He is contraticting himself and obviously lying about something which leads to me believe his ankle injury isnt that bad and he just got beat by a better baseline player then himself.
Oh my god
the stupiditiy of some people on here is unbelievable....yeh he's so much of an ass he'd make something up, pull out of a match just because he was losing. Dude maybe thats what u do losing, but this guy is a professional athlete, he was advised by doctors to not play the tournament but he played anyway.
What i'm guessing that means, which btw i didn't hear either was...that if he had won the second set and the same thing happened i.e the trainer not being able to strap it he would have had to pull out. Had the trainer been able to strap it regardless of the second set he would have played on, plain and simple. Not exactly a contradiction,