James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material... - Page 2 - MensTennisForums.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #16 of 37 (permalink) Old 12-23-2007, 04:52 AM
Registered User
 
Kolya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Munich
Posts: 11,324
                     
Re: James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material...

Good thing for James is that we did improve a lot since 2002.

Robin Bo Carl Söderling
Kolya is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #17 of 37 (permalink) Old 12-23-2007, 11:07 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Age: 34
Posts: 9,312
                     
Re: James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ace Tracker View Post
just IMHO, and I confess that I haven't followed Blake's game for long, but from what I've seen, I don't think he will ever be a force to be reckoned with in Grand Slams...a good player that will probably have a decent career and results, a la Andrei Pavel or MaliVai Washington for example, but hardly the Slam titlist and answer to Sampras and Agassi's retirement that the American Media is hopeing for...not trying to belittle the mentioned players' careers, but where Roddick's game still has lots of room for improvement, I think James is playing almost as good as he can right now...
AGREE. 5-SET MATCH IS NOT HIS FAVORITE

GO Roger Federer, Nick Kyrgios, Borna Coric, Vasek Pospisil, Thomaz Bellucci, Kei Nishikori, , Milos Raonic, Jerzy Janowicz, Grigor Dimitrov, Dennis Novikov and Bernard Tomic

Thiem will be top three by Dec 2016
Borna Coric will be No 1 by Dec 2017
Nick Kyrgios will be No 1 by Jan 2018
jcempire is offline  
post #18 of 37 (permalink) Old 12-24-2007, 12:17 AM
Registered User
 
CyBorg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,166
                     
Re: James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material...

Quote:
Originally Posted by prima donna View Post
Thanks for stating the obvious!

The sun rises from the east; anything you can do, I can do better than you.
Read the thread... carefully.
CyBorg is offline  
post #19 of 37 (permalink) Old 12-24-2007, 12:39 AM
Banned!
 
prima donna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,319
                     
Re: James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material...

Quote:
Originally Posted by CyBorg View Post
Read the thread... carefully.
It was just as obvious then as it is now. Learn to understand the beauty of irony.
prima donna is offline  
post #20 of 37 (permalink) Old 12-24-2007, 06:02 AM
Registered User
 
dragons112's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 29
Posts: 309
                     
Re: James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ace Tracker View Post
just IMHO, and I confess that I haven't followed Blake's game for long, but from what I've seen, I don't think he will ever be a force to be reckoned with in Grand Slams...a good player that will probably have a decent career and results, a la Andrei Pavel or MaliVai Washington for example, but hardly the Slam titlist and answer to Sampras and Agassi's retirement that the American Media is hopeing for...not trying to belittle the mentioned players' careers, but where Roddick's game still has lots of room for improvement, I think James is playing almost as good as he can right now...
If he had a effective slice backhand it would relief so much pressure for him to be powerful. He would bein the top 5

LONG LIVE THE KING

1.Federer
2.Tsonga
3.Safin
4.Roddick
dragons112 is offline  
post #21 of 37 (permalink) Old 12-24-2007, 06:15 AM
Registered User
 
Monteque's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: somewhere in the tropical place
Age: 30
Posts: 1,934
                     
Re: James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material...

He is the rusty material but not the rustiest just like all players of his generation except Roddick (Fish, Kim, Dent, Kendrick, Gineori, Gimel) so at least USTA still looking him as a rusty useful material.

ROGER-RAFA:THE BEST RIVALRY IN THE HISTORY OF SPORTS
Monteque is offline  
post #22 of 37 (permalink) Old 12-24-2007, 10:17 AM
Registered User
 
FedererSlam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 28
Posts: 548
                     
Re: James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material...

IMO he hasn't got the mental toughness to win a slam. He is also very easily undone by variety because of his style of play.

Roger Federer
16 Grand Slam Titles
The Serena Slam
27 Grand Slam Titles
FedererSlam is offline  
post #23 of 37 (permalink) Old 12-24-2007, 10:40 AM
Registered User
 
dl05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 32
                     
Re: James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material...

I dont ever think the tennis world expects Blake to win a slam anytime soon. He's definitely improved so much over the last couple of years( albeit his mediocre 2007 didnt exactly do him any favours ranking wise), but he's been a top player in those years nonetheless.

If you were to watch tennis for the first time, you'd probably question why he hasnt won a slam yet. I mean he has a ballistic forehand, superb footspeed and let's face it- is physically in extremely good shape. However, blake has very major flaws that hold him back in matches, particulary at Slam level:

1) Serve can lose it's consistency, and generally his serving % isnt that impressive anyway, so it really hampers him against the likes of Federer, Djokovic etc.

2) So mentally fragile in big matches IMO. Evidence being his extremely poor record in five set matches where he just cant finish the match off e.g. against Agassi and Haas at the US Open in 2005 and 07.

3) His shot selection is questionable. I do feel his game has become more structured in recent years(largely building on constructing the point with the serve and the forehand), but he is prone to very bizarre thought processes. Still has that flashy exuberance of 2002/03, which he still turns into sometimes.The backhand starts sparying errors etc.


Dont get me wrong, i think Blake is a good player and has done so well to break into the top 10 when you consider his personal tragedies and potentially life-threatening injuries, but i feel Blake will never be a 'great' player. However it's no disgrace, as he's living a career far beyond what people would've thought 5 years ago. Unfortunately for Blake, a slam is out of the question IMO.
dl05 is offline  
post #24 of 37 (permalink) Old 05-04-2011, 12:51 PM
Registered User
 
nevenez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 822
                     
Re: James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ace Tracker View Post
just IMHO, and I confess that I haven't followed Blake's game for long, but from what I've seen, I don't think he will ever be a force to be reckoned with in Grand Slams...a good player that will probably have a decent career and results, a la Andrei Pavel or MaliVai Washington for example, but hardly the Slam titlist and answer to Sampras and Agassi's retirement that the American Media is hopeing for...not trying to belittle the mentioned players' careers, but where Roddick's game still has lots of room for improvement, I think James is playing almost as good as he can right now...
8 years later we can say that you were Right
nevenez is offline  
post #25 of 37 (permalink) Old 05-04-2011, 01:06 PM
Registered User
 
barbadosan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: I hear my Bimshire calling . . .
Age: 67
Posts: 9,686
                     
Re: James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material...

Quote:
Originally Posted by nevenez View Post
8 years later we can say that you were Right
For heavens sake, if by slam material you mean winning a slam, how many people HAVE been slam material since then, and after 2003??? It's not like there were dozens of candidates breaking down the door and winning slams, unless they were mostly called Federer and Nadal



"When I'm asked, how is it to be around Federer, and what is he really like, I always reply, "I wish people could meet him when cameras or an audience aren't around, as he is one of the nicest people I have ever met when stringing on tour. " -- drakulie
barbadosan is offline  
post #26 of 37 (permalink) Old 05-04-2011, 01:06 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,844
                     
Re: James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material...

Seriously, dude. Go read a book if you're bored.
OnyxRose is offline  
post #27 of 37 (permalink) Old 05-04-2011, 01:17 PM
Registered User
 
nevenez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 822
                     
Re: James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material...

Quote:
Originally Posted by barbadosan View Post
For heavens sake, if by slam material you mean winning a slam, how many people HAVE been slam material since then, and after 2003??? It's not like there were dozens of candidates breaking down the door and winning slams, unless they were mostly called Federer and Nadal
For me Slam material means arriving at Slam SF with consistency.
nevenez is offline  
post #28 of 37 (permalink) Old 05-04-2011, 01:31 PM
Registered User
 
wildemu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Age: 30
Posts: 7,713
                     
Re: James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material...

Quote:
Originally Posted by nevenez View Post
8 years later we can say that you were Right
I am sure the poster whose last post was 6 years ago will appreciate this pat on the back.
wildemu is offline  
post #29 of 37 (permalink) Old 05-04-2011, 02:33 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 13,139
                     
Re: James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material...

Quote:
Originally Posted by tennisfan856 View Post
I am sure the poster whose last post was 6 years ago will appreciate this pat on the back.
Especially coming from the poster who has contributed such great threads to MTF as "Boobs or Ass" and "What's your IQ?"

Mods, can we please lock these ancient troll threads so they never see the light of day again?

Quote:
Originally Posted by leng jai View Post
Anyone who says any player has no chance against Dolgopolov is clearly trolling.
That's the gospel.
Fumus is offline  
post #30 of 37 (permalink) Old 05-04-2011, 02:37 PM
Registered User
 
nevenez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 822
                     
Re: James Blake is a good player but is not Slam material...

So you think i'm a troll?
Seems that people are making wrong assumptions.
nevenez is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome