Are All Potential Fed Supporters Converted? - MensTennisForums.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 20 (permalink) Old 04-26-2006, 06:40 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 344
                     
Are All Potential Fed Supporters Converted?

It looks like the media (USA at least...Bricker, Cronin, etc.) has made a semi-universal decision to declare Fed as being owned by Nadal. The loss combined with the Fed's less than spectacular post-match interview seem to have done the trick. The question is, are there still Fed supporters who would be change their minds (ie. start beliving that Nadal is more likely to win heads up) if Federer kept losing duels? Or are the remaining fans (as in people who think Fed will beat Nadal soon, say during this clay season) all people whose opinions won't change?
It is sort of important, because this begs the question, will the media be more anti-Fed than it is today if Fed loses more, or has it hit the bottom?
Of course, this is assuming that Fed's other performances stay the same, ie. he doesn't totally self destruct and start losing lots of first rounds...that would probably make even his die-hard's think twice.
Jairus is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 20 (permalink) Old 04-26-2006, 07:00 AM
Registered User
 
Allez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,025
                     
Re: Are All Potential Fed Supporters Converted?

How does acknowledging that Rafa currently owns Roger equate to being Anti-Fed ? I mean do you think people are being anti ATP by pointing out that Roger owns most of the players out there at the moment ? I just don't get your question. One's opinions should be based on facts and not blind fanaticism. Unfortunately the facts now read 4-1 in Nadal's favour. This should be clear even to the most daft of sheeple...
Allez is offline  
post #3 of 20 (permalink) Old 04-26-2006, 07:41 AM
Registered User
 
Castafiore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,954
                     
Re: Are All Potential Fed Supporters Converted?

Quote:
Of course, this is assuming that Fed's other performances stay the same, ie. he doesn't totally self destruct and start losing lots of first rounds...
That's daft. Self destruct? Federer? Not a chance.

Furthermore, it's ridiculous to even suggest that the media is anti-Fed. Reading various articles about him over the past few months, the respect and the admiration he has in the media is huge and this defeat does not change that one bit.
I mean, look at what he already has accomplished this year. It's silly to ignore those performances and I have seen no evidence that most journalists have suddenly forgotten that.
Castafiore is offline  
post #4 of 20 (permalink) Old 04-26-2006, 08:27 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 344
                     
Re: Are All Potential Fed Supporters Converted?

So to clarify a bit, I meant the public/media's opinion about Fed specifically in regards to his chances against Nadal, not broadly anti-fed. The idea is, if Fed loses more to Nadal, will more people join the camp of "Nadal will generally beat Fed" or have all the people who might join that camp already gone there?
Also, I think the media has gotten sharply critical of Fed after Sunday's loss especially compared to how they have considered him in the past. Even after the loss in Dubai, there was only a few mutterings about Fed fearing Nadal. But apparently the difference between 3-1 and 4-1 and dramatic, because there is a lot more press about Nadal owning Fed.
Jairus is offline  
post #5 of 20 (permalink) Old 04-26-2006, 08:33 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 564
                     
Re: Are All Potential Fed Supporters Converted?

Im in the 'Federer will formulate a way to beat Nadal when he doesnt play to his best' because when Federer plays his best no-one can touch him imo. Nadal disruptes him and in a sense makes him beat himself.
Allstar is offline  
post #6 of 20 (permalink) Old 04-26-2006, 08:35 AM
♥ eve ♥
 
bokehlicious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lausanne
Posts: 40,775
                     
Re: Are All Potential Fed Supporters Converted?

Papers may write what they want. After Roger's FO win they won't remember that Monte Carlo tier 1 loss, and kiss Roger's arse again . Period.
bokehlicious is offline  
post #7 of 20 (permalink) Old 04-26-2006, 08:59 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 344
                     
Re: Are All Potential Fed Supporters Converted?

See, take you two, Allstar and JM. I am in the same group as you guys...do you really think that if Fed keeps losing close matches to Nadal and dominates the rest of the tour, we will change our minds? I feel like I wouldn't; rather, I would still be waiting for Fed to really put it together and crush Nadal (yes, probably won't happen, but it seems like it should, b/c of my bizzaro interpretation of the world of tennis: Fed wins, always). I was just wondering if others thought that way.
Jairus is offline  
post #8 of 20 (permalink) Old 04-26-2006, 09:09 AM
♥ eve ♥
 
bokehlicious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lausanne
Posts: 40,775
                     
Re: Are All Potential Fed Supporters Converted?

Jairus, I won't change my mind, I am not a 'bandwagoner', I enjoy beautiful tennis, beautiful shots and tactics. Even whether Roger loses his next 20 encounters against Nadal, I'll never root for that latter, his game and personnality just don't fit me.
bokehlicious is offline  
post #9 of 20 (permalink) Old 04-26-2006, 09:27 AM
Registered User
 
TheMightyFed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Somewhere in space
Posts: 2,490
                     
Re: Are All Potential Fed Supporters Converted?

Fed will beat Nadal in slam finals.

"I asked a bloke in the front row if he liked the serve-and-volley stuff," said Rafter. "He said he did but asked if he was going to get to see any rallies. 'Not today, mate,' I told him."
TheMightyFed is offline  
post #10 of 20 (permalink) Old 04-26-2006, 11:23 AM
Registered User
 
Peoples's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,294
                     
Re: Are All Potential Fed Supporters Converted?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMightyFed
Fed will beat Nadal in slam finals.
I don't see how the Monte Carlo final was different from a clay slam final. It's a strategic loss when someone's game just matches up badly with Federer's, nothing else. If you simply don't have solutions against someone's game then only a miracle will help, e.g. the Gaudio-Coria theatre final.

Federer is "getting closer" to Nadal? I don't buy that. Roger still hasn't foudn the strategy. Nadal is a counter-puncher whose level depends on how the other player is playing. Nadal only dominates when you let him. You can't "learn how to beat his game", you can't get closer to him, you have to play your game so that he can't get all those the balls back and this isn't happening with Nadal/Federer.

fernandogonzález
Peoples is offline  
post #11 of 20 (permalink) Old 04-26-2006, 11:34 AM
Registered User
 
TheMightyFed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Somewhere in space
Posts: 2,490
                     
Re: Are All Potential Fed Supporters Converted?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peoples
I don't see how the Monte Carlo final was different from a clay slam final. It's a strategic loss when someone's game just matches up badly with Federer's, nothing else. If you simply don't have solutions against someone's game then only a miracle will help, e.g. the Gaudio-Coria theatre final.

Federer is "getting closer" to Nadal? I don't buy that. Roger still hasn't foudn the strategy. Nadal is a counter-puncher whose level depends on how the other player is playing. Nadal only dominates when you let him. You can't "learn how to beat his game", you can't get closer to him, you have to play your game so that he can't get all those the balls back and this isn't happening with Nadal/Federer.
I may be in denial but I believe that Grand Slams are beyond logic sometimes, especially FO, think Lendl-Chang 89, Gaudio-Coria 04. Nadal is nearly unbeatable on clay, everybody agrees. Now in a slam a champion can go much beyond his capabilities, see Safin USO 00, or Connors USo 91. This is why slams are unique, they offer surprises. Roger has trouble dealing with Nadal but he will always be a challenge to him. Edberg had a 2-1 record against Becker in Wimbledon finals while the overall record is 10-25 for Becker. It's a mind game and in a slam final, Federer is not Puerta, he's in another league.

"I asked a bloke in the front row if he liked the serve-and-volley stuff," said Rafter. "He said he did but asked if he was going to get to see any rallies. 'Not today, mate,' I told him."
TheMightyFed is offline  
post #12 of 20 (permalink) Old 04-26-2006, 11:36 AM
Registered User
 
betterthanhenman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,952
                     
Re: Are All Potential Fed Supporters Converted?

To answer the thread title/question...No!

"My greatest point is my persistence. I never give up in a match. However down I am, I fight until the last ball. My list of matches shows that I have turned a great many so-called irretrievable defeats into victories."

Bjorn Borg

Roland Garros, France
Grand Slam, 29-May-78



R128 Deblicker, Eric (FRA) N/A 6-1 6-1 6-1
R64 Fagel, Rick (USA) N/A 6-0 6-1 6-0
R32 Bertolucci, Paolo (ITA) N/A 6-0 6-2 6-2
R16 Tanner, Roscoe (USA) N/A 6-2 6-4 7-6
Q Ramirez, Raul (MEX) N/A 6-3 6-3 6-0
S Barazzutti, Corrado (ITA) N/A 6-0 6-1 6-0
W Vilas, Guillermo (ARG) N/A 6-1 6-1 6-3
betterthanhenman is offline  
post #13 of 20 (permalink) Old 04-26-2006, 11:48 AM
Registered User
 
Peoples's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,294
                     
Re: Are All Potential Fed Supporters Converted?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMightyFed
I may be in denial but I believe that Grand Slams are beyond logic sometimes, especially FO, think Lendl-Chang 89, Gaudio-Coria 04. Nadal is nearly unbeatable on clay, everybody agrees. Now in a slam a champion can go much beyond his capabilities, see Safin USO 00, or Connors USo 91. This is why slams are unique, they offer surprises. Roger has trouble dealing with Nadal but he will always be a challenge to him. Edberg had a 2-1 record against Becker in Wimbledon finals while the overall record is 10-25 for Becker. It's a mind game and in a slam final, Federer is not Puerta, he's in another league.
You are right these things do happen but they're sort of miracles that I wouldn't bet on. Slams are unique but in slams Nadal is still 1-0 vs Federer. Sure Fed is always a challenge for Nad but Nadal does have the confidence of having done it before while Federer will be the one doubting. Nadal feeds off this kind of doubt. In a way this is a unique situation for Federer so we will see but on clay i.e. in RG I'd put my money on Nadal although I do have the confidence that eventually Federer will learn and overcome this.

fernandogonzález
Peoples is offline  
post #14 of 20 (permalink) Old 04-26-2006, 01:08 PM
Registered User
 
TheMightyFed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Somewhere in space
Posts: 2,490
                     
Re: Are All Potential Fed Supporters Converted?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peoples
You are right these things do happen but they're sort of miracles that I wouldn't bet on.
I believe in miracles...

"I asked a bloke in the front row if he liked the serve-and-volley stuff," said Rafter. "He said he did but asked if he was going to get to see any rallies. 'Not today, mate,' I told him."
TheMightyFed is offline  
post #15 of 20 (permalink) Old 04-26-2006, 01:25 PM
Registered User
 
avocadoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,591
                     
Re: Are All Potential Fed Supporters Converted?

There are two ways for Roger to beat Rafa's current game, even on clay, maybe. He has to play great for 5 sets. He has to play the way he played during 2004. Great serving and far fewer errors. He also needs to use the net whenever he can. His movement has improved again, post injuries, but still not 100 percent. He needs that, too. Rafa is in his head, but not entirely in a bad way. He's a puzzle for him. Roger is very smart and may figure him out. The second wy to beat Nadal is for Nadal to play not his best. That has to happen sometime, no? But losing to Nadal doesn't take anything away from Roger for me. I love hs game, his smile, everything. I'm not a Nadal detractor, either. I enjoy his game for what it is, and on clay, I find it fiery and exciting to watch. But cmon Roger beat him up in Rome or Paris, or both As far as the pres goes, I am hoping for an article by Bud Collins!!!!
avocadoe is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome