I say one of them, but not both nor neither. I'm leaning towards Monte Carlo, he's come very close there and while he did come close at Rome too, that was in 2006, and I think 2015 was his last great chance there.
Therefore handing the victory to Federer by default, no?He will come up against Nick at Monte Carlo who will say *do you ever bang your wife* and he will walk out!
I'm looking forward to see how Backhanderer fares on clay, but I kinda lean towards your opinion.It's not impossible, but I doubt it. Federer isn't really that impressive on clay anymore at this point in his career.
Actually it doesn't seem to be necessarily true. I think with players getting older losing speed, Clay seem to help them with it and especially the knees with the high bounce. Many older players still prefer Clay than Hard Courts I think. They just need to construct points better there.No. He's 36 years old grandpa now. Clay is for the young and stronk.