Mens Tennis Forums banner
Status
Not open for further replies.

Why is Djokovic always screwed up by unfair scheduling and umpiring on slams?

13K views 208 replies 81 participants last post by  InfoKenway 
#1 · (Edited)
This is getting ridiculous. I can understand one or two slams, or occasional bad luck, but this has been going on for years. Let's ignore all old well known rigged draws (SF draws whileNo1e was #3), or slams that were taken from him - for example AO 2009, USO 2010, RG 2011, RG 2012, USO 2012, RG 2013, USO 2013, ..., at the moment, and focus on these last two. It is way too much by itself.

First on RG, biased French organizers rigged the draw to ridiculous levels forcing Djokovic to play Nadal in the QF and Murray in SF, while Federer and the French players get silly cakewalk draw. Than on top of that the SFs were intentionally scheduled to start late (3pm) with of course Tsonga - Wawrinka being scheduled first and Murray - Djokovic last with very good chance not to finish on time. As a result Wawrinka was shown watching the SF on Saturday laughing, since he knew he will face exhausted demoralized Djokovic in the final.

Than now on Wimbledon, corrupted AELTC full of blind Murraytards, gave Djokovic the most ridiculous difficult draw in the first 4 rounds (Kohlschreiber, Hewitt, Tomic, Anderson) and than again clearly intentionally schedule Djokovic's 4th round match the very last, and not on CC where #1 seed should be, but on unlit faster C1 court, while again favored Murray and Federer gets easy nice CC scheduling. This Novak's match had no real chance of finishing on time and clearly this was not an accident. To confirm that, organizers flatly and baltantly refused to move the match to the CC to be finished tonight, something that they did just two days ago for Simon-Monfils match. :mad: How is that fair and makes any sense.

Clearly there is a big setup to make winning slams as difficult as possible for Djokovic, while making it as easy as possible for his main rivals (Nadal in previous years, Federer, Murray, ...)

Enough is enough. We want fair slams and justice. The best player and #1 seed needs to finally get the respect, fair draws and proper scheduling he deserves. This ridiculous practice has to stop, or tennis as a sport will lose all integrity.

It is quite clear that Djokovic with fair and even scheduling and draws, would have at least 12-14 slams by now and would be a really serious GOAT contender.

:mad: :mad: :mad:
 
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: leng jai and cveks
#2 ·
I appreciate your insight Srđan.
 
#43 ·
:lol:

seriously, how about rafa in 2007 Wimby? Only one match with Solderling lasted 3 days........
 
#7 ·
I'm stoked chico is not coming up with any excuse for Wimbledon 2009.
 
#11 ·
Wimbledon 2009 was lost fair and square to inspired Haas. Just like RG 2009 to Kohli. Nole was in the slump in 2009 after the AO. A racquet change, secret agent Martin sent to screw up his serve, ...

However, all listed in the OP are clear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: leng jai
#14 ·
Unfair scheduling and rigged draw for Nadal. Do you remember Nadal's draw in USO 2010. :haha: Do you remember who he faced in the SF (Youzhny :haha:) and who Djokovic had to play in the SF (epic 5 setter vs Federer)?

Djokovic was clearly exhausted and unable to play the proper final.
 
  • Like
Reactions: leng jai
#12 ·
Just way too good from ch1co. Who can stop this ACC dynasty-in-waiting :eek:?
 
#13 ·
Djoker draw rally players in the first rounds and the last rounds are all big hitters.

Fed & Murray draw big hitters first and final rounds are rally.

Assume if Djoker makes the final will be unprepared in rallies again.

But no complains..grand slam champion must adapt all court tennis.

Fed last year was screwed by no rallies to final.
 
#17 · (Edited)
After chico's unbiased analysis of Djokovic's career circumstances, does he now come into the GOAT calculations? After reading the OP it's truly remarkable Djokovic has even managed 8 slams. Conservatively speaking you can probably add another 8 to his resume had he been treated fairly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cveks
#21 · (Edited)
After chico's unbiased analysis of Djokovic's career circumstances, does he now come into the GOAT calculations? After reading the OP it's truly remarkable Djokovic has even managed to 8 slams. Conservatively speaking you can probably add another 8 to his resume had he been treated fairly.
That is a fair assumption, but I think another 8 is too much. 4-6 by now, seems like a more realistic number.

So it is quite fair to estimate that Djokovic was robbed and screwed up by about 4-6 slams due to unfair draws, scheduling, umpiring and other biased outside factors.

And that is not including this current Wimbledon, since he might still manage to win it due to his sheer dominance and superior skills, but AELTC has made it really difficult for him indeed. :mad:
 
  • Like
Reactions: leng jai
#20 · (Edited)
I dont know why people bring baby Djokovic into discussion. The point is that prime Djokovic has been robbed of numberous slams and has many years ahead of him. I fear external factors will only add up.

Federer has played plenty of 5 setters in his career, but has never been forced to come back and play the very next day, always well rested easy opponents.

Wake up people.

Look at the draw of the last 2 slams he lost.
FO

QF: Nadal Multi grandslam winner
SF: Murray multi grandslam winner
F: Wawrinka multi grandslam winner

Wimbledon:

QF: Cilic grandslam winner
SF: Wawrinka Multi grandslam winner
F: Federer or Murray Multi grandslam winners

Enough is enough!!!
 
#24 ·
I dont know why people bring baby Djokovic into discussion. The point is that prime Djokovic has been robbed of numberous slams and has many years ahead of him. I fear external factors will only add up.

Federer has played plenty of 5 setters in his career, but has never been forced to come back and play the very next day, always well rested easy opponents.

Wake up people.

Look at the draw of the last 2 slams he lost.
FO

QF: Nadal Multi grandslam winner
SF: Murray multi grandslam winner
F: Wawrinka multi grandslam winner

Wimbledon:

QF: Cilic grandslam winner
SF: Wawrinka grandslam winner
F: Federer or Murray Multi grandslam winners

Enough is enough!!!
Wawrinka wasn't a multi grandslam winner :confused::confused::confused:
 
#27 ·
Indeed. It is off topic trolling and has nothing to do with the thread.
 
#31 · (Edited)
Chico hoped RBA would tire out federer in 5 sets yesterday instead djokovic's choking master opponent drags him to a 5th set :superlol:
So funny :haha:

Federer's head to head against djokovic's opponents

Kohli 9-0
Jarkko 15-0
Tomug 4-0
Kanderson 3-0

total 32-0
Djokovic's fault for choking the tiebreak to Mr "Clutchderson"

Don't complain about djokovic's draw..djokovic lost to querrey of all people on indoor hard court in 2012 remember ?
 
#33 ·
Should of just blitzed anderson like roger did with agut. They both went on court at the same time
 
#35 ·
Any perceived misfortune on Djokovic's part this tournament is well and truly trumped by him drawing Grasswrinka in his half instead of Murray, the second favorite for the title. Having to play Murray in the SF followed by Fed in the final would have been 100x worse than all the minor BS his fans are complaining about. But he luckily dodged that proposition, and now the 2nd/3rd favs for the title have to duke it out in the other half of the draw.
 
#44 ·
Do you want some cheese with that whine, chico?

That being said, I didn't really understand why they scheduled Djokovic at Court 1 yesterday. Federer was playing at the same time at Center Court. Now, I know Federer is a seven-times Wimbledon champion, GOAT, etc., and I'm happy he played at CC, but hey, Djokovic is the current #1, and also the #1 seed. Surely he deserves more "recognition".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
Top