ESPN Coverage - MensTennisForums.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 27 (permalink) Old 01-21-2006, 02:55 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
WF4EVER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,159
                     
ESPN Coverage

I just came in here to express my utter disgust with ESPN.

When does this story ever change? Same shit different day.

I can't believe it. I saw Lleyton Hewitt's match four times between ESPN2 and ESPN deportes, now I'm seeing Martina Hingis for the third time. Do they ever intend to show Roger's matches at all, or will they only do that if they're absolutely forced to if he reaches the FInal? What the fuck is going on over there, man.

I am so tired of Hingis, it's not even funny. And she just started playing. Everything is Hingis, Hingis, Hingis, and she has yet to beat any opponent of quality to make me think she's worth watching three times in a row, playing the same fucking match!

I swear I have not seen one single match of Roger's in its entirety up to now and I expected that with their limited programming (and by that I mean limited to certain players and limited in airtime) that they would at least show a match they hadn't shown before.

I swear the only consolation in all this is to know that Roger already won his match. ESPN just continues to sicken me, year after year, Slam after Slam.

I want to see if when the 12:00 coverage starts on ESPN2 they'll show Martina again. The fucked up thing is there are many matches being played, many exciting matches that they have not bothered to show yet they are drilling the same matches into our heads nonstop.

Last edited by WF4EVER; 01-21-2006 at 02:58 PM.
WF4EVER is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 27 (permalink) Old 01-21-2006, 03:04 PM
Miss Thang
 
sigmagirl91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Big Blue Nation
Age: 45
Posts: 36,083
                     
Re: ESPN Coverage

This is nothing new. They've always shown whom they want to show, and that will never change.

Talk to the hand because the ears don't hear you.
sigmagirl91 is offline  
post #3 of 27 (permalink) Old 01-21-2006, 03:05 PM
Registered User
 
PaulieM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ithaca, NY
Age: 30
Posts: 10,023
                     
Re: ESPN Coverage

join the party

Goran Ivanisevic~ You Never Forget Your First (Tennis) Love!

ROGER FEDERER

GROSJEAN, HENMAN, MOYA, CORIA

ANCIC, BLAKE, LJUBICIC, CLEMENT, SANTORO, BAGHDATIS, MONFILS

F-LO, DENT, PHM, MULLER, STEPANEK, PHILIPPOUSSIS

Co-Founder and Proud Member of M.A.S.H.A


"If you even dream of beating me, you'd better wake up and apologize."-Muhammad Ali

My Blog!
PaulieM is offline  
post #4 of 27 (permalink) Old 01-21-2006, 03:08 PM
Registered User
 
partygirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hollywood, CA
Age: 34
Posts: 14,050
                     
Re: ESPN Coverage

DAMN RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

espn is the shit...and not in a good way.

they ought to be ashamed of their coverage...really if you cant do a decent job of bringing matches to people step aside and let somebody else try, fuck they piss me off- and its really the only place that i can see tennis- which really makes me sick...i wont even start on their commentators.

the thing is they have multiple channels they can spread their coverage through out, but do they no...its just horribble i think they had 4 hours of classic poker (what the fuck) on espn classic last night- i sat their thinking they could have used that time to show a couple of matches i mean these slams only happen for 8 weeks out of the year- and they are a "SPORTS" network right???? -poker is not a sport-

they have lost thier minds over there they are even forgetting about players who's matches they always cover (they are even forgetting to show the final scores of matches they dont intend to show) now its like they dont know what to do or what to show...

did they do any planning before hand, forethought is a great thing- especially when you need to get your act together....or just quit

"leader in sports" -my ass, espn gets the big F U
partygirl is offline  
post #5 of 27 (permalink) Old 01-21-2006, 03:14 PM
Vamos Mandy :)
 
Deboogle!.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Looking for Andy's forehand with Sarah and Re...
Posts: 85,829
                     
Re: ESPN Coverage

Quote:
Originally Posted by WF4EVER
The fucked up thing is there are many matches being played, many exciting matches that they have not bothered to show yet they are drilling the same matches into our heads nonstop.
Which do you want? To see Roger or to see exciting matches? Roger's matches haven't been exciting so far. They didn't even show Andy's beatdown from the other day. But they've picked up some crazy 5-setters late in the game, last night after Martina they showed Haas/Luczak and Kiefer/Ferrero - not huge tennis names in this country particularly, but pretty good tennis all-around. During their scheduled night live coverage they have surprisingly diverged from their original plans to show live tennis. So far during those windows they have shown one taped match when other good stuff was going on - that was Martina's last night. Otherwise, they've been willing to adjust to whatever the live tennis brings. Compared to 2 years ago or so, when if they said they were showing something live, if that match ended up finishing early, they'd just show it on tape - that's a huge leap forward, when they used to show everything on tape even during the "live" night coverage windows. There's no doubt that two years ago, for example, they would've shown Andy beat Benneteau on tape that night, instead of live tennis. This year they didn't show it and went for live tennis instead. Awesome!

Their coverage has improved a lot over the past couple years. It's obviously far from perfect but they're clearly learning from their mistakes and listening to complaints by adding all the 3:30am coverage for the first several days and by going late after their coverage is supposed to end most days.

Obviously it's still worth complaining to them about your individual gripes and concerns, but if you don't think they improved, we must not be watching the same thing. And the fact that they're committed to doing what they can in a culture where the sport is not all that popular, i'm not gonna bite the hand that feeds me my grand slam tennis

LA Pics & Reports ~ My New Blog: Adventures of a Picky Foodie! ~ My Travel Blog

to (in no particular order): BryOns | Mandy | MarTy | Isner | Dent | Querrey | Baghdatis | Delic | Oli | N&o | Gasquet | Ferrero | Levine | Malisse | LUX | Melzer | Moya | Nishikori | Haas | Grosjean | Ancic | Mathieu | Calleri | Bolelli | Sela | Blake | more...

Last edited by Deboogle!.; 01-21-2006 at 03:17 PM.
Deboogle!. is offline  
post #6 of 27 (permalink) Old 01-21-2006, 03:20 PM
Registered User
 
PaulieM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ithaca, NY
Age: 30
Posts: 10,023
                     
Re: ESPN Coverage

their coverage this year is far worse than last year. and as for them not showing roger because they don't want to show a blow out, fine with me but don't show live and taped coverage of andy and sharapova beatdowns either.(yes both their first and second round matches were shown live and again the next day, and almost in their entirety as well) i get that they want to show names that people know, but there has to be a middle ground somewhere, if you don't show others then people will never get to know other names, someone has to make the tough decision which will lead to improved coverage in the future. the thing that's bothered me the most is that almost all of their coverage has been women's tennis. i wish they'd just sell the rights to someone who will actually cover the sport well, but they won't as long as they can keep making money without having to do a good job because people can't go elsewhere. sorry but there has been nothing good about their coverage this year, in terms of not showing roger and otherwise.

Goran Ivanisevic~ You Never Forget Your First (Tennis) Love!

ROGER FEDERER

GROSJEAN, HENMAN, MOYA, CORIA

ANCIC, BLAKE, LJUBICIC, CLEMENT, SANTORO, BAGHDATIS, MONFILS

F-LO, DENT, PHM, MULLER, STEPANEK, PHILIPPOUSSIS

Co-Founder and Proud Member of M.A.S.H.A


"If you even dream of beating me, you'd better wake up and apologize."-Muhammad Ali

My Blog!
PaulieM is offline  
post #7 of 27 (permalink) Old 01-21-2006, 03:22 PM
Registered User
 
partygirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hollywood, CA
Age: 34
Posts: 14,050
                     
Re: ESPN Coverage

they are still rerunning a lot of matches...

really with such limited coverage...if you miss it then you miss it- move on
partygirl is offline  
post #8 of 27 (permalink) Old 01-21-2006, 03:25 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,396
                     
Re: ESPN Coverage

Quote:
Originally Posted by deb.
Which do you want? To see Roger or to see exciting matches? Roger's matches haven't been exciting so far. They didn't even show Andy's beatdown from the other day. But they've picked up some crazy 5-setters late in the game, last night after Martina they showed Haas/Luczak and Kiefer/Ferrero - not huge tennis names in this country particularly, but pretty good tennis all-around. During their scheduled night live coverage they have surprisingly diverged from their original plans to show live tennis. So far during those windows they have shown one taped match when other good stuff was going on - that was Martina's last night. Otherwise, they've been willing to adjust to whatever the live tennis brings. Compared to 2 years ago or so, when if they said they were showing something live, if that match ended up finishing early, they'd just show it on tape - that's a huge leap forward, when they used to show everything on tape even during the "live" night coverage windows. There's no doubt that two years ago, for example, they would've shown Andy beat Benneteau on tape that night, instead of live tennis. This year they didn't show it and went for live tennis instead. Awesome!

Their coverage has improved a lot over the past couple years. It's obviously far from perfect but they're clearly learning from their mistakes and listening to complaints by adding all the 3:30am coverage for the first several days and by going late after their coverage is supposed to end most days.

Obviously it's still worth complaining to them about your individual gripes and concerns, but if you don't think they improved, we must not be watching the same thing. And the fact that they're committed to doing what they can in a culture where the sport is not all that popular, i'm not gonna bite the hand that feeds me my grand slam tennis
stfu you women's tennis cronie!
uNIVERSE mAN is offline  
post #9 of 27 (permalink) Old 01-21-2006, 03:27 PM
Vamos Mandy :)
 
Deboogle!.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Looking for Andy's forehand with Sarah and Re...
Posts: 85,829
                     
Re: ESPN Coverage

But they've been focusing on Roger as one of their main covered players basically since he hit #1. I think it's an aberration that his first two matches weren't shown in entirety because of when his matches were scheduled and the way the draws worked out. i mean, lindsay is #1 in the world AND American and they don't always show her matches with prime coverage either. I think it was Roger's 2nd round match that ESPN had scheduled to show during their nighttime window but it ended early and so instead they showed live tennis and they showed what they could of Roger's match later on in the coverage. Sorry, but I'll take any live coverage over any taped coverage, even my faves, even #1s in the world. And the fact that they've only pre-empted live coverage once so far, is a huge improvement over previous years in my mind.

I agree it'd be nice to see a different match on tape the next day, if what they're scheduled to show is something that they aired live the night before. But ESPN is first and foremost a business. If their research shows more people watch the repeat of the American or the pretty girl or whatever, that's what they'll show. Any good businessman would do the same. It's the same bad cycle that we all discuss 2985209482094 times a year and it never changes

Universe Man, if you knew anything about me at all (which you clearly do not by your ignorant and rude statement), you'd know I'm not a WTA fan

LA Pics & Reports ~ My New Blog: Adventures of a Picky Foodie! ~ My Travel Blog

to (in no particular order): BryOns | Mandy | MarTy | Isner | Dent | Querrey | Baghdatis | Delic | Oli | N&o | Gasquet | Ferrero | Levine | Malisse | LUX | Melzer | Moya | Nishikori | Haas | Grosjean | Ancic | Mathieu | Calleri | Bolelli | Sela | Blake | more...

Last edited by Deboogle!.; 01-21-2006 at 03:29 PM.
Deboogle!. is offline  
post #10 of 27 (permalink) Old 01-21-2006, 03:30 PM
Registered User
 
partygirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hollywood, CA
Age: 34
Posts: 14,050
                     
Re: ESPN Coverage

Quote:
Originally Posted by deb.
Universe Man, if you knew anything about me at all (which you clearly do not by your ignorant and rude statement), you'd know I'm not a WTA fan
yeah!
that and im not about to argue with a lawyer (or just as good as)

i do however reserve the right to be very displeased.

question:
is it too much to ask that they use more than one of their channels for maximum coverage???
partygirl is offline  
post #11 of 27 (permalink) Old 01-21-2006, 03:31 PM
Registered User
 
PaulieM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ithaca, NY
Age: 30
Posts: 10,023
                     
Re: ESPN Coverage

Quote:
Originally Posted by deb.
But they've been focusing on Roger as one of their main covered players basically since he hit #1. I think it's an aberration that his first two matches weren't shown in entirety. i mean, lindsay is #1 in the world AND American and they don't always show her matches with prime coverage either. I think it was Roger's 2nd round match that ESPN had scheduled to show during their nighttime window but it ended early and so instead they showed live tennis and they showed what they could of Roger's match later on in the coverage. Sorry, but I'll take any live coverage over any taped coverage, even my faves, even #1s in the world. And the fact that they've only pre-empted live coverage once so far, is a huge improvement over previous years in my mind.
i don't care that they didn't show roger's matches,his first two have been snoozers(although if it's really about the snooze factor i can think of a lot of other matches they should have skipped the first time around and certainly shouldn't have replayed). but i do care that rather than showing matches they didn't get to cover the night before during their taped stuff the next day, they show the same match they showed at 7pm the night before. if it was something they showed at 2:30 am when most people weren't up, then they have more of a point, but that isn't usually what they've been doing. that imo is a stupid way to do coverage.

Goran Ivanisevic~ You Never Forget Your First (Tennis) Love!

ROGER FEDERER

GROSJEAN, HENMAN, MOYA, CORIA

ANCIC, BLAKE, LJUBICIC, CLEMENT, SANTORO, BAGHDATIS, MONFILS

F-LO, DENT, PHM, MULLER, STEPANEK, PHILIPPOUSSIS

Co-Founder and Proud Member of M.A.S.H.A


"If you even dream of beating me, you'd better wake up and apologize."-Muhammad Ali

My Blog!
PaulieM is offline  
post #12 of 27 (permalink) Old 01-21-2006, 03:33 PM
Registered User
 
PaulieM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ithaca, NY
Age: 30
Posts: 10,023
                     
Re: ESPN Coverage

Quote:
Originally Posted by deb.

I agree it'd be nice to see a different match on tape the next day, if what they're scheduled to show is something that they aired live the night before. But ESPN is first and foremost a business. If their research shows more people watch the repeat of the American or the pretty girl or whatever, that's what they'll show. Any good businessman would do the same. It's the same bad cycle that we all discuss 2985209482094 times a year and it never changes
of course from their perspective it makes sense to do that, but that doesn't make it any less annoying. and since this thread is about how annoying espn's coverage is, then i'd say i agree with the thread starter, it has sucked balls(tennis balls of course ).

Goran Ivanisevic~ You Never Forget Your First (Tennis) Love!

ROGER FEDERER

GROSJEAN, HENMAN, MOYA, CORIA

ANCIC, BLAKE, LJUBICIC, CLEMENT, SANTORO, BAGHDATIS, MONFILS

F-LO, DENT, PHM, MULLER, STEPANEK, PHILIPPOUSSIS

Co-Founder and Proud Member of M.A.S.H.A


"If you even dream of beating me, you'd better wake up and apologize."-Muhammad Ali

My Blog!
PaulieM is offline  
post #13 of 27 (permalink) Old 01-21-2006, 03:35 PM
Vamos Mandy :)
 
Deboogle!.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Looking for Andy's forehand with Sarah and Re...
Posts: 85,829
                     
Re: ESPN Coverage

Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulieM
that imo is a stupid way to do coverage.
Yes, from a tennis fan's perspective. I'm not saying I AGREE with it, but ESPN is a business and they know what will make them money. They are gonna show what's good for their business, not what's good for us hard-core tennis fans. It sucks but it's the reality, and until somehow the cycle breaks and the average ESPN viewer is more aware of the internatilonality of the sport and all the players, I don't see that really changing unfortunately.

But I see a lot of people complain many times a year, every year, about all the same issues. but no one ever really comes up with a feasible solution that ESPN would actually be able to adopt.

LA Pics & Reports ~ My New Blog: Adventures of a Picky Foodie! ~ My Travel Blog

to (in no particular order): BryOns | Mandy | MarTy | Isner | Dent | Querrey | Baghdatis | Delic | Oli | N&o | Gasquet | Ferrero | Levine | Malisse | LUX | Melzer | Moya | Nishikori | Haas | Grosjean | Ancic | Mathieu | Calleri | Bolelli | Sela | Blake | more...
Deboogle!. is offline  
post #14 of 27 (permalink) Old 01-21-2006, 03:41 PM
Registered User
 
PaulieM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ithaca, NY
Age: 30
Posts: 10,023
                     
Re: ESPN Coverage

Quote:
Originally Posted by deb.
Yes, from a tennis fan's perspective. I'm not saying I AGREE with it, but ESPN is a business and they know what will make them money. They are gonna show what's good for their business, not what's good for us hard-core tennis fans. It sucks but it's the reality, and until somehow the cycle breaks and the average ESPN viewer is more aware of the internatilonality of the sport and all the players, I don't see that really changing unfortunately.

But I see a lot of people complain many times a year, every year, about all the same issues. but no one ever really comes up with a feasible solution that ESPN would actually be able to adopt.
i agree with you, like i said in my first post, in terms of making money it makes perfect sense, in terms of making me and a lot of hardcore fans happy, it makes none, and clearly money wins(yeah i'm special but i think they like money better ) the solution, is to make the tough choice, show some so called unknowns because it's a higher quality more entertaining match, with the hope that you'll actually create fans of the sport and have people tune in to see quality matches not to see individual names, and increase the customer's lifetime value for the company. for espn that gamble simply isn't worth it ie. feasible. until they have someone who can reasonably compete with them, they insentive isn't there.

Goran Ivanisevic~ You Never Forget Your First (Tennis) Love!

ROGER FEDERER

GROSJEAN, HENMAN, MOYA, CORIA

ANCIC, BLAKE, LJUBICIC, CLEMENT, SANTORO, BAGHDATIS, MONFILS

F-LO, DENT, PHM, MULLER, STEPANEK, PHILIPPOUSSIS

Co-Founder and Proud Member of M.A.S.H.A


"If you even dream of beating me, you'd better wake up and apologize."-Muhammad Ali

My Blog!
PaulieM is offline  
post #15 of 27 (permalink) Old 01-21-2006, 03:56 PM
Vamos Mandy :)
 
Deboogle!.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Looking for Andy's forehand with Sarah and Re...
Posts: 85,829
                     
Re: ESPN Coverage

Where's the outrage that ESPN has dropped Davis and Fed Cups completely? To me this is far more egregious and disconcerting than imperfect slam coverage and really disappointing and shows a far worse problem in ESPN's commitment to showing tennis I think

LA Pics & Reports ~ My New Blog: Adventures of a Picky Foodie! ~ My Travel Blog

to (in no particular order): BryOns | Mandy | MarTy | Isner | Dent | Querrey | Baghdatis | Delic | Oli | N&o | Gasquet | Ferrero | Levine | Malisse | LUX | Melzer | Moya | Nishikori | Haas | Grosjean | Ancic | Mathieu | Calleri | Bolelli | Sela | Blake | more...
Deboogle!. is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome