Using Stats to Try and Take Roger's Measure -
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 2 (permalink) Old 09-16-2005, 02:36 AM Thread Starter
1,000 Baby!
nobama's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jony Ive's design cave
Posts: 19,909
Using Stats to Try and Take Roger's Measure

Using Stats to Try and Take
Roger Federer's Measure

September 12, 2005 5:54 p.m.

Roger Federer isn't yet the best-ever men's tennis player -- he has to win eight more Grand Slam tournaments just to match Pete Sampras's record 14. But he already holds a more-remarkable record: He's won 23 straight tournament-final matches, last losing to Jiri Novak in July 2003.

That's far more impressive than his current winning streak of 24 matches and his hard-court streak of 35, because in finals, Mr. Federer often plays the world's best players. During his streak, he's beaten Andy Roddick five times, Lleyton Hewitt three times, Marat Safin twice and Andre Agassi twice -- including at the U.S. Open on Sunday. Bjorn Borg and John McEnroe shared the previous Open-era record for wins in finals, with a mere 12. (The record on the women's side is 25, by Margaret Court in 1972-1974, when competitive balance wasn't what it is today.)

How improbable is this feat? To get an idea, I checked in with Stephen Clarke, a professor at Australia's Swinburne University of Technology who has studied tennis statistics, and who ran some numbers of its own.

The roughest guess is that Mr. Federer had a 50% chance of winning each final, since presumably the players who advance to the finals are close in ability. Multiply 50% 23 times, and you get one in 8.4 million. That's like flipping a coin 23 times and landing heads each time.

But, of course, that's overstating the case, because Mr. Federer is a better than one in two shot against anyone in the world. He's gone 71-3 this year and 158-12 during his streak, winning 92.94% of his matches. Multiply 92.94% 23 times, and you get just one in five -- not that impressive a feat.

But this is vastly understating the magnitude of his achievement, because, again, his odds of winning finals should be lower than in earlier rounds. So here's a rough effort to compute his odds: We compiled the winning percentages in finals of four of his closest competitors during the streak -- Messrs. Roddick, Hewitt, Agassi and Safin, and Rafael Nadal -- omitting all those losses they racked up to Mr. Federer. Their combined record in finals not featuring Mr. Federer was 29-8, or 78.4%. Multiply that by itself 23 times, and you get one in 270. That's a rough measure of how unlikely it would be for any of the top players other than Mr. Federer to win 23 finals in a row -- even if their wildest dreams had been answered and Mr. Federer hadn't been playing the last two years.

nobama is offline  
post #2 of 2 (permalink) Old 09-16-2005, 03:26 AM
Last dance, Andy
tangerine_dream's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New York New Englander
Posts: 25,456
Re: Using Stats to Try and Take Roger's Measure

Is the Federer forum closed?

Congrats to Andy Roddick, 2017 Hall of Fame!

"I beat him the last time. He's lucky I retired." — Andy Roddick on RF

Mugs Tennis Forums
tangerine_dream is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome