Roger's dominance partially due to his disposition? - MensTennisForums.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 22 (permalink) Old 08-24-2005, 07:29 PM Thread Starter
1,000 Baby!
 
nobama's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jony Ive's design cave
Posts: 19,909
                     
Roger's dominance partially due to his disposition?

From Wertheim's most recent column:
Quote:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...pen.bag/1.html

Any chance that Roddick and other players will engage in locker-room strategy sessions to compare notes on how to beat Federer? Or have such strategy sessions already occurred?
-- Ed Lilly, Lawrenceville, N.J.

Interesting point. Remember the Survivor-style pact Martina Hingis and Lindsay Davenport once made against the Williams sisters? Maybe it's time the men did likewise with Federer.

I've written this before but I think a component -- a small component, but a component nonetheless -- of Federer's dominance is his disposition. He's such a nice guy that it's really hard for anyone to muster hatred for him on the court. I don't think he's being disingenuous. I don't think it's a tactic. But it's really effective. You wonder why boxers, for instance, don't take a page out of Federer's book. Instead of antagonizing and talking trash, you act congenially and, thus, don't inflame the passion of the opposition as much.
I've often thought the same thing. Reading press conferences with Andy after he's lost to Roger and he just goes on and on about how great Roger is, what a great guy he is off court, ect. James Blake did the same thing last week after his R1 loss in Cincy. I mean I think Andy has an easier time getting fired up when playing Lletyon than when playing Roger. I agree with Jon, I think Roger is sincerely a nice guy (has any player ever said anything negative about him?), but it does make it tough for guys to get fired up and really want to beat him.

nobama is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 22 (permalink) Old 08-24-2005, 07:31 PM
Registered User
 
Nimomunz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 1,332
                     
Re: Roger's dominance partially due to his disposition?

i still think they are fired up and really want to beat him!!

Jolie is a man eating wench and i love her!!!
Nimomunz is offline  
post #3 of 22 (permalink) Old 08-24-2005, 07:36 PM
Comparisons are Odious
 
mangoes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Catching the vigorous horse of my mind......
Posts: 10,541
                     
Re: Roger's dominance partially due to his disposition?

I disagree. They are fired up to beat Roger.



Live Life to the Fullest , Be Happy , Find Peace within Yourself ..................
Tennis Helps!!
mangoes is offline  
post #4 of 22 (permalink) Old 08-24-2005, 07:39 PM
Registered User
 
PaulieM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ithaca, NY
Age: 30
Posts: 10,023
                     
Re: Roger's dominance partially due to his disposition?

i guess i could be a small factor, but i doubt it. i think that no matter how nice someone is, the fact that they keep kicking your ass is enough of a reason for you to be very fired up to beat them.

Goran Ivanisevic~ You Never Forget Your First (Tennis) Love!

ROGER FEDERER

GROSJEAN, HENMAN, MOYA, CORIA

ANCIC, BLAKE, LJUBICIC, CLEMENT, SANTORO, BAGHDATIS, MONFILS

F-LO, DENT, PHM, MULLER, STEPANEK, PHILIPPOUSSIS

Co-Founder and Proud Member of M.A.S.H.A


"If you even dream of beating me, you'd better wake up and apologize."-Muhammad Ali

My Blog!
PaulieM is offline  
post #5 of 22 (permalink) Old 08-24-2005, 07:52 PM
Registered User
 
irma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 297
                     
Re: Roger's dominance partially due to his disposition?

He is not nice on the tenniscourt (in sense that he is beating them all constantly) so that can't be the reason. It more seems that players like Andy R are too much in awe with this game and don't really believe they can beat him, but that has nothing to do with his personality!
irma is offline  
post #6 of 22 (permalink) Old 08-24-2005, 08:43 PM
Fed Fo Mod
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On vacation...
Age: 45
Posts: 11,233
                     
Re: Roger's dominance partially due to his disposition?

INteresting....
NYCtennisfan is offline  
post #7 of 22 (permalink) Old 08-24-2005, 08:52 PM
Registered User
 
Geniey2g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: London
Posts: 1,011
                     
Re: Roger's dominance partially due to his disposition?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mirkaland
From Wertheim's most recent column:

I've often thought the same thing. Reading press conferences with Andy after he's lost to Roger and he just goes on and on about how great Roger is, what a great guy he is off court, ect. James Blake did the same thing last week after his R1 loss in Cincy. I mean I think Andy has an easier time getting fired up when playing Lletyon than when playing Roger. I agree with Jon, I think Roger is sincerely a nice guy (has any player ever said anything negative about him?), but it does make it tough for guys to get fired up and really want to beat him.
Do you only make threads about Roger?

Geniey2g is offline  
post #8 of 22 (permalink) Old 08-24-2005, 08:53 PM
Registered User
 
Nimomunz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 1,332
                     
Re: Roger's dominance partially due to his disposition?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geniey2g
Do you only make threads about Roger?
yes

Jolie is a man eating wench and i love her!!!
Nimomunz is offline  
post #9 of 22 (permalink) Old 08-24-2005, 09:02 PM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Mechlan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,153
                     
Re: Roger's dominance partially due to his disposition?

I think it goes both ways. Sometimes being the nice guy might make your opponents take it easier (though I don't think that's the case for Roger). But in other sports, you want to antagonize the opposition. You want to talk shit, to scream at them, to rile them up, because anger can then get in the way and cloud their judgement and cause them to perform worse than usual.
Mechlan is offline  
post #10 of 22 (permalink) Old 08-24-2005, 09:21 PM
Last dance, Andy
 
tangerine_dream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New York New Englander
Posts: 25,446
                     
Re: Roger's dominance partially due to his disposition?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geniey2g
Do you only make threads about Roger?
Well, it's a welcome change from some of the Federer fans only making condescending threads about Roddick.

Anyhoo, I think the disposition thing is an interesting idea but honestly, if anybody really needed to get fired up and pissed off at Roger to beat him they could find a way. Roger is a nice guy but he's also said some things that could be interpreted as arrogant if one really wanted to (ie, twist the words around a bit). Roger plays with a lot of controlled aggression and he's learned to use his anger to his advantage whereas other players use their anger to vent at the chair ump and then they wonder why they lose.

Also, Jimmy Connors was the King of Assholes but hating him still didn't help his opponents learn to beat him.

"What kind of shape am I in now? Well round is a shape." said Roddick with a laugh. "I had a very detailed retirement plan, and I feel like I've met every aspect of it: a lot of golf, a lot of carbs, a lot of fried food, and some booze, occasionally — I've been completely committed ... The results have shown."


Mugs Tennis Forums
tangerine_dream is offline  
post #11 of 22 (permalink) Old 08-24-2005, 09:34 PM
Registered User
 
Whistleway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,239
                     
Re: Roger's dominance partially due to his disposition?

Roddick would love to beat Roger and would give anything for it. It just shows Weirthem never played the game at any level.. But, at sometime, I would love for Andy to beat Roger. He's too nice just to not win anything.
Whistleway is offline  
post #12 of 22 (permalink) Old 08-24-2005, 09:37 PM
Registered User
 
mitalidas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,048
                     
Re: Roger's dominance partially due to his disposition?

Everyone would like to be the person That Broke Roger's Streak. His niceness never prevented henman and berdych and hrbaty and others from beating him, did it?

Roger had this motto long before he became Roger Federer, which to me sums it all up --"It's nice to be important but it's more important to be nice". At first I thought EGAD, where is the killer instinct in that?? But turns out, this guy has a killer instinct on court and is just Joe Nice offocourt
mitalidas is offline  
post #13 of 22 (permalink) Old 08-24-2005, 09:41 PM
F***ing have it
 
alfonsojose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Barranquilla (COL)
Age: 41
Posts: 16,976
                     
Re: Roger's dominance partially due to his disposition?

disposition to ..

"Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another" .. Madonna

Drooling after Schuettler, Bolelli, Volandri, Starace (short haired version), ToJo, Tursunov, Alves, Petzschner, Simon, Qureshi, Steve Johnson
alfonsojose is offline  
post #14 of 22 (permalink) Old 08-24-2005, 09:42 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,648
                     
Re: Roger's dominance partially due to his disposition?

I guess Wertheim has never played any sport himself. Anyone wants a piece of NO1, no matter if he's a nice person, or a complete jerk. Also, there are a lot of money and points involved.

Last edited by ExpectedWinner; 08-24-2005 at 09:46 PM.
ExpectedWinner is offline  
post #15 of 22 (permalink) Old 08-24-2005, 09:43 PM
Registered User
 
YoursTruly's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 35
Posts: 2,473
                     
Re: Roger's dominance partially due to his disposition?

Roger is known to be such a nice guy and figure for tennis, but even if this does play a role in why the others don't have a chance against him, it's probably a really small percentage. Of course they'd all aim to beat Roger, but Roger's game is just too much to handle. Naturally as well.

"i'm not here to do a cinema" - jhh talking to the press about her match
against kournikova (which she won easily), us open 2000
YoursTruly is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome