Roger's three losses in 2005 so far... - MensTennisForums.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 39 (permalink) Old 08-22-2005, 01:31 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
TheMightyFed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Somewhere in space
Posts: 2,490
                     
Roger's three losses in 2005 so far...

So at this stage of the season Roger lost ... three times only (since Cincinatti last year BTW).
-1st loss to Marat Safin, AO SF (hard): 7-5 4-6 7-5 6-7(6) 7-9
1 MP
Epic battle, very close throughout the match. Marat got a good coaching from Lundgren it seems, he overpowered and made run Federer a lot. Federer had a minor foot injury.

-2nd loss to Richard Gasquet, Monte-Carlo QF (clay): 7-6(1) 2-6 6-7(10)
1 MP
Begining of the clay season for Fed (not his favourite surface), right after Miami. Gasquet is in a momentum, lots of winners, shows mental strength at key moments (MP against him). Though not in a GS, this is the earliest loss of Fed this season.

-3rd loss to Rafael Nadal, Roland Garros SF (clay): 3-6 6-4 4-6 3-6
One of the much anticipated showdowns of the season, Fed is quite nervous and starts the match very badly contrary to his habits (many breaks). He's had a good draw and is full of energy but he doesn't handle the Rafa lefty topspin at the net and he's often overpowered on baseline.

IMO the most siginficant loss is Nadal's, as Roger didn't seem to be able to win, because he was doing too many mistakes (BH, FH and volleys). In addition, he didn't have "external factors" to explain the loss. He was unusually nervous. However, we can notice that Nadal's game is the most "1 dimensionnal" of the three, but he compensated with his mental strength and his science of clay.
In the other two matches it was the usual Federer, and he even showed a capacity to fight till the end and in adversity, that some questioned at the time (cf. Wertheim).
Not surprisingly 2 losses came on clay, where Fed is a bit less confident and less patient, though one of the best on the tour.
The Gasquet match is a bit special as Federer lost to a kind of "double" of himself, a talented all-courter without huge power. Gasquet, due to lack of stamina, certainly wouldn't have won in a 5-set match, but he seized his opporunities and took advantage of his relatively "unknown" game on the tour.
So to beat Fed in 2005 :
-Make him visit the court a lot
-Bombard him with maximum pace on both wings
-Play on clay
-Build confidence before with lots of wins in previous torunies
-Prepare for a tough and long journey
What do you think ?

"I asked a bloke in the front row if he liked the serve-and-volley stuff," said Rafter. "He said he did but asked if he was going to get to see any rallies. 'Not today, mate,' I told him."

Last edited by mdhubert; 08-22-2005 at 03:54 PM.
TheMightyFed is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 39 (permalink) Old 08-22-2005, 01:33 PM
Registered User
 
mitalidas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,048
                     
Re: The three losses of Roger in 2005 so far: analysis and comparison

he had matchpoints in two of these three. there is no question that the much better player won at the French.

At the other two, it ended in final set tiebreak and 9-7 in the fifth. Roger has won so many of those close matches (this year --against ljubicic, ferrero), but these two he lost. You could say the better person won, but frankly, on a final set tiebreak it is a lottery.
mitalidas is offline  
post #3 of 39 (permalink) Old 08-22-2005, 01:38 PM
Registered User
 
1sun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,783
                     
Re: The three losses of Roger in 2005 so far: analysis and comparison

should have beaten marat, that loss hurt him the most

131 and proud
1sun is offline  
post #4 of 39 (permalink) Old 08-22-2005, 01:39 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
TheMightyFed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Somewhere in space
Posts: 2,490
                     
Re: The three losses of Roger in 2005 so far: analysis and comparison

Quote:
Originally Posted by mitalidas
You could say the better person won, but frankly, on a final set tiebreak it is a lottery.
But still, when Fed has a MP against you, it takes good balls to stay alive...

"I asked a bloke in the front row if he liked the serve-and-volley stuff," said Rafter. "He said he did but asked if he was going to get to see any rallies. 'Not today, mate,' I told him."
TheMightyFed is offline  
post #5 of 39 (permalink) Old 08-22-2005, 01:40 PM
Registered User
 
PamV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,671
                     
Re: The three losses of Roger in 2005 so far: analysis and comparison

mdhubert:

Roger's loss to Nadal in the FO SF was NOT a shock. Nadal was the favorite on clay. Roger has never done that well on clay except for Hamburg....which is a different type of clay and a colder climate.

As for his loss to Gasquet, again that red clay is not his best surface but keep in mind that he had just won two prior MS tournaments back to back. Most of the top players were not even entered to play Monte Carlo. Later in the year Roger beat Gasquet in straight sets in the Hamburg final.

Of all the loses the AO loss has to be the most disappointing. It was so close and if he had won that he would have no doubt beaten Hewitt in the final.

Roger Forever !
PamV is offline  
post #6 of 39 (permalink) Old 08-22-2005, 01:44 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
TheMightyFed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Somewhere in space
Posts: 2,490
                     
Re: The three losses of Roger in 2005 so far: analysis and comparison

Quote:
Originally Posted by PamV
mdhubert:

Roger's loss to Nadal in the FO SF was NOT a shock. Nadal was the favorite on clay. Roger has never done that well on clay except for Hamburg....which is a different type of clay and a colder climate.

As for his loss to Gasquet, again that red clay is not his best surface but keep in mind that he had just won two prior MS tournaments back to back. Most of the top players were not even entered to play Monte Carlo. Later in the year Roger beat Gasquet in straight sets in the Hamburg final.

Of all the loses the AO loss has to be the most disappointing. It was so close and if he had won that he would have no doubt beaten Hewitt in the final.
Good remarks. Did I say that this SF loss was a shock ? The match, the encounter, was a shock, not the loss. As you say he still has to adapt to RG conditions and that explains a bit his nervousness. But he put a lot of balls in the net and was often out of position, which is not usual for him, even on clay.

"I asked a bloke in the front row if he liked the serve-and-volley stuff," said Rafter. "He said he did but asked if he was going to get to see any rallies. 'Not today, mate,' I told him."
TheMightyFed is offline  
post #7 of 39 (permalink) Old 08-22-2005, 01:49 PM
Registered User
 
Puschkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 15,912
                     
Re: The three losses of Roger in 2005 so far: analysis and comparison

Quote:
Originally Posted by mitalidas
At the other two, it ended in final set tiebreak and 9-7 in the fifth. Roger has won so many of those close matches (this year --against ljubicic, ferrero), but these two he lost. You could say the better person won, but frankly, on a final set tiebreak it is a lottery.
Yes and no, on overage the better players do win the lotteries more often . You heard me, Mr. Safin?
Puschkin is offline  
post #8 of 39 (permalink) Old 08-22-2005, 01:52 PM
Registered User
 
Cervantes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Age: 37
Posts: 3,080
                     
Re: The three losses of Roger in 2005 so far: analysis and comparison

I didn't see the match against Gasquet, but I believe the Nadal match was the one he could or should have won. I mean against Safin it was just an unbelievable match and Marat played very well. Against Nadal it was just plain bad tennis from Federer, but still halfway through the 3rd I felt Roger was getting on top and he could have won it.

ROGER FEDERER

Berdych, Blake, J. Johansson, Ljubicic, Nalbandian and Tursunov


2005 PAW Year-end ranking: 1
2006 PAW Year-end ranking: 1
2007 PAW Year-end ranking: 6

Career titles (7): 2004 – Toronto AMS; 2005 – Monte Carlo AMS, Roland Garros, Kitzbühel; 2006 – Doha, Beijing; 2007 - Kitzbühel.
Finalist (3): 2005 – Miami AMS, Barcelona; 2006 – Bastad.
Cervantes is offline  
post #9 of 39 (permalink) Old 08-22-2005, 01:56 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
TheMightyFed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Somewhere in space
Posts: 2,490
                     
Re: The three losses of Roger in 2005 so far: analysis and comparison

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cervantes
but still halfway through the 3rd I felt Roger was getting on top and he could have won it.
Too fragile and too short, from the first point we felt Rog was in danger this day, and he screwed up badly his advance in the third. It's strange what you say, because without this damn lob in the fourth he WAS beating Safin in AO ! Nowhere we saw Nadal fighting for his life in RG... alas

"I asked a bloke in the front row if he liked the serve-and-volley stuff," said Rafter. "He said he did but asked if he was going to get to see any rallies. 'Not today, mate,' I told him."
TheMightyFed is offline  
post #10 of 39 (permalink) Old 08-22-2005, 02:01 PM
Registered User
 
Jessie_Sophie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Age: 27
Posts: 23
                     
Re: Roger's three losses in 2005 so far...

LOL..just noticed..it was Nadal's birtday when he beat Federer, right?? And also Marat's!!! Hahah..so it should be your birtday to be able to beat Federer!!
Ah big WHOOOOOO for the birtday boys!!

Lots of love,
Jessie_Sophie is offline  
post #11 of 39 (permalink) Old 08-22-2005, 02:02 PM
Registered User
 
Cervantes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Age: 37
Posts: 3,080
                     
Re: The three losses of Roger in 2005 so far: analysis and comparison

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdhubert
Too fragile and too short, from the first point we felt Rog was in danger this day, and he screwed up badly his advance in the third. It's strange what you say, because without this damn lob in the fourth he WAS beating Safin in AO ! Nowhere we saw Nadal fighting for his life in RG... alas
I'm not saying he didn't have a chance to beat either Gasquet or Safin, but at least he played up to his potential against Safin. Against Nadal I feel he could have done better and that's why I regard this loss the worst.

ROGER FEDERER

Berdych, Blake, J. Johansson, Ljubicic, Nalbandian and Tursunov


2005 PAW Year-end ranking: 1
2006 PAW Year-end ranking: 1
2007 PAW Year-end ranking: 6

Career titles (7): 2004 – Toronto AMS; 2005 – Monte Carlo AMS, Roland Garros, Kitzbühel; 2006 – Doha, Beijing; 2007 - Kitzbühel.
Finalist (3): 2005 – Miami AMS, Barcelona; 2006 – Bastad.
Cervantes is offline  
post #12 of 39 (permalink) Old 08-22-2005, 02:03 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
TheMightyFed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Somewhere in space
Posts: 2,490
                     
Re: Roger's three losses in 2005 so far...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jessie_Sophie
LOL..just noticed..it was Nadal's birtday when he beat Federer, right?? And also Marat's!!! Hahah..so it should be your birtday to be able to beat Federer!!
Ah big WHOOOOOO for the birtday boys!!
Yep, very true ! but it has to be a GS SF to work, otherwise... maybe it's extra motivation: I'm getting old (esp. Nadal), I have to move my ass...

"I asked a bloke in the front row if he liked the serve-and-volley stuff," said Rafter. "He said he did but asked if he was going to get to see any rallies. 'Not today, mate,' I told him."
TheMightyFed is offline  
post #13 of 39 (permalink) Old 08-22-2005, 02:04 PM
Registered User
 
Experimentee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,274
                     
Re: Roger's three losses in 2005 so far...

I only saw two of those. At the AO I dont think he was hindered much by any injury, Safin was just awesome and outplayed and overpowered him. It was still close, but that was because Roger played very well too.

At RG Nadal was a lot better and Federer didnt play his best, but he had no chance. The answer to beating Fed is to just stay solid, keep your level up throughout the match, and overpower him with your best shot(s). Not very easy to do.
Experimentee is offline  
post #14 of 39 (permalink) Old 08-22-2005, 02:07 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
TheMightyFed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Somewhere in space
Posts: 2,490
                     
Re: Roger's three losses in 2005 so far...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Experimentee
The answer to beating Fed is to just stay solid, keep your level up throughout the match, and overpower him with your best shot(s). Not very easy to do.
I fax the recipe to Ducky and C'moon guy straight away... I would add that you can forget the powerful serve but instead look for placement to build the next "killer" shot

"I asked a bloke in the front row if he liked the serve-and-volley stuff," said Rafter. "He said he did but asked if he was going to get to see any rallies. 'Not today, mate,' I told him."
TheMightyFed is offline  
post #15 of 39 (permalink) Old 08-22-2005, 02:10 PM
Registered User
 
1sun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,783
                     
Re: Roger's three losses in 2005 so far...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Experimentee
I only saw two of those. At the AO I dont think he was hindered much by any injury, Safin was just awesome and outplayed and overpowered him. It was still close, but that was because Roger played very well too.

At RG Nadal was a lot better and Federer didnt play his best, but he had no chance. The answer to beating Fed is to just stay solid, keep your level up throughout the match, and overpower him with your best shot(s). Not very easy to do.
if safin outplayed roger then it would have been a straight sets beat down
roger had cahnces mate against rafa. it was alot closer than people seem to think it was

131 and proud
1sun is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome