Coria's suspension for doping (some clarifications) - MensTennisForums.com
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 11 (permalink) Old 08-08-2005, 11:44 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,601
                     
Coria's suspension for doping (some clarifications)

Since we are all reading again those posts about "only argentine players are dopers", I found it necesarry to explain why Coria was suspended. The best source is the ATP itself. You'll find a news release from the ATP explaining those reasons at http://www.atptennis.com/en/media/reports/01_coria.pdf

As you can see, the ATP itself conceded that: (i) the source of Nandrolone was a comercially available nutritional supplement contaminated at the point of manufacture, one not labeled to contain a banned substance among its ingredients nor marketed as such, (i) Coria was completele unaware that the supplement was contaminated with a banned substance; (iii) he acted reasonably to fully abide by the Tennis Anti Doping Program rules.

Of course, Rusesdky was not suspended for taking the same substance...

Nalbandian - JMDP - Djokovic - Nadal - Mathieu - Verdasco - Coria - Tipsarevic - Nieminen - Calleri
Julio1974 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 11 (permalink) Old 08-08-2005, 11:57 PM
Registered User
 
roisin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Age: 28
Posts: 6,369
                     
Re: Coria's suspension for doping (some clarifications)

Ok, maybe I'm ignorant in all this but why was Coria banned and Rusedski wasn't...?

How many times must we of shot nerves witness the undoubted pain & suffering of muppets everywhere before we stand up against the cavemen??

One muppet, who wishes to remain anonymous, has this to say: "You know, I uhhhh cannot stay all the time at the you know, base of the line. Too much uhhhh pression."

It is your turn to help - The "Save A Muppet Foundation" needs you!
roisin is offline  
post #3 of 11 (permalink) Old 08-09-2005, 12:02 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,601
                     
Re: Coria's suspension for doping (some clarifications)

Quote:
Originally Posted by roisin
Ok, maybe I'm ignorant in all this but why was Coria banned and Rusedski wasn't...?
I'm ignorant too but I'd love to know. Here you have an article about Rusedski.

Rusedski Cleared of Doping Offence
10 Mar 2004

Following a positive test for nandrolone, Greg Rosedski (British - Canadian tennis player) has been cleared of a doping offence.

Nandrolone is a steroid. Rusedski failed a drugs test last year in the summer. He has been vehemently protesting his innocence to the ATP (Association of Tennis Professionals).

Rusedski said the verdict was clear and unequivocal. He said he will hold a news conference on Tuesday. 'It's an enormous relief for me and my family and I look forward to resuming my career,' he said.

According to the Tribunal there was no evidence of supporting such a finding – that he had committed a doping offence. The Tribunal said he had been cleared of doping.

Bohdn Ulihrach, a Czech player, was cleared of doping last year under similar circumstances. This is what Rusedski’s defence revolved around.

In Ulihrach’s case, the Tribunal decided that the trainers may have been responsible for giving the contaminated supplements. Six other unnamed players were also cleared in that case.

The Association of Tennis Professionals said that they had told players not to take supplements two months before Rusedski had his test. They told players in May of last year.

Rusedski and his lawyers said that Rusedski’s case was identical to the other seven players who were cleared. The Tribunal agreed and cleared him.

A spokesman for the Tribunal said 'The ATP argued unsuccessfully that Mr Rusedski could be held to be positive as he must be taken to have known that he should not take substances given to him by the ATP. The ATP could have - and should have - taken steps to notify its players in a 'meaningful' and 'direct' way of the reasons for its decision to cease distributing the electrolyte tablets.'

The Association of Tennis Professionals can appeal if they want, they will have to do so through the Court of Arbitration for Sports. They have 21 days to appeal.

WHAT IS NANDROLONE?

Nandrolone is an anabolic steroid commercially known as Deca-Durabolin. It was popular with sprinters and throwers in track and field in the 1970s. The powerful testosterone derivative is taken by injection.

Athletes often used nandrolone with oral steroids and amino acids, a combination they suggested showed great gains of muscle. When drug testing became more sophisticated in the 1980s, athletes quit using nandrolone because it was easily detectable.

The drug stays in the system so long, athletes who use it are likely to be caught by a test.

Nandrolone is used to treat anemia from renal failure and for HIV patients to stimulate weight gain. But it became controversial in the world of sports because scores of athletes tested positive for it in the past five years.

Some of the high-profile cases involved Petr Korda, who tested positive at the 1998 Wimbledon championships, and Olympic sprinters Linford Christie of England and Merlene Ottey of Jamaica.

All claimed their innocence, suggesting the drug was the result of a contaminated supplement.

Nalbandian - JMDP - Djokovic - Nadal - Mathieu - Verdasco - Coria - Tipsarevic - Nieminen - Calleri
Julio1974 is offline  
post #4 of 11 (permalink) Old 08-09-2005, 12:10 AM
Registered User
 
mitalidas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,048
                     
Re: Coria's suspension for doping (some clarifications)

As hard as they tried to wriggle out of this mess, the ATP tried to say that EVEN If they gave the supplements they are not culpable. Which of course is crap. Ultimately, THAT is what got rusedski freed -- that the supplements were proven to come from the ATP themselves. this is not the case in almost any other tennis player's doping case
mitalidas is offline  
post #5 of 11 (permalink) Old 08-09-2005, 12:19 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,601
                     
Re: Coria's suspension for doping (some clarifications)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mitalidas
As hard as they tried to wriggle out of this mess, the ATP tried to say that EVEN If they gave the supplements they are not culpable. Which of course is crap. Ultimately, THAT is what got rusedski freed -- that the supplements were proven to come from the ATP themselves. this is not the case in almost any other tennis player's doping case
I understand the theoric difference but I don't find it relevant. Both players took contaminated supplements. Neither of them should have been suspended.

Nalbandian - JMDP - Djokovic - Nadal - Mathieu - Verdasco - Coria - Tipsarevic - Nieminen - Calleri
Julio1974 is offline  
post #6 of 11 (permalink) Old 08-09-2005, 12:21 AM
Registered User
 
Avatar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Age: 36
Posts: 300
                     
Re: Coria's suspension for doping (some clarifications)

I'd like to believe the law is the same for all the players, but the ATP didn't judge Coria and Rusedski cases in the same way. This talks bad from ATP.

- Avatar -
Avatar is offline  
post #7 of 11 (permalink) Old 08-09-2005, 09:36 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Age: 40
Posts: 286
                     
Re: Coria's suspension for doping (some clarifications)

First of all, Coria's case was in 2001 and Rusedski's in 2004.

In 2001, nobody knew about the contaminated supplements provided by the ATP. And in Coria's case, there is no mention that his contaminated supplements were from the ATP or his own personal supply.

Rusedski's case was different, in the light of the evidence from the situation of Ulihrach and the 7 others.

In any case, the doping tribunal is an independent body and not controlled by the ATP, WTA or ITF.
crouching is offline  
post #8 of 11 (permalink) Old 08-09-2005, 02:56 PM
Registered User
 
joyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 911
                     
Re: Coria's suspension for doping (some clarifications)

So they were both innocent,but Coria was unlucky.
joyk is offline  
post #9 of 11 (permalink) Old 08-09-2005, 04:02 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,601
                     
Re: Coria's suspension for doping (some clarifications)

Quote:
Originally Posted by joyk
So they were both innocent,but Coria was unlucky.
Exactly.

Nalbandian - JMDP - Djokovic - Nadal - Mathieu - Verdasco - Coria - Tipsarevic - Nieminen - Calleri
Julio1974 is offline  
post #10 of 11 (permalink) Old 08-09-2005, 04:16 PM
Forum Umpire:
Gaston Gaudio
 
Action Jackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 124,507
                     
Re: Coria's suspension for doping (some clarifications)

Quote:
Originally Posted by joyk
So they were both innocent,but Coria was unlucky.
You would be right in that assessment.

On Nadal bumping him on the changeover, Rosol said: "It's ok, he wanted to take my concentration; I knew he would try something".


Wilander on Dimitrov - "He has mind set on imitating Federer and yes it looks good. But he has no idea what to do on the court".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Filo V. View Post
I definitely would have preferred Gaba winning as he needs the points much more, but Jan would have beaten him anyway. I expect Hajek to destroy Machado, like 6-1 6-2.
Machado wins 6-2 6-1
Action Jackson is offline  
post #11 of 11 (permalink) Old 08-09-2005, 05:40 PM
Registered User
 
ugotlobbed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,606
                     
Re: Coria's suspension for doping (some clarifications)

is coria suspended for davis cup only or is there other occasions?

i love mango juice
ugotlobbed is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome