I was never an advocate for the whole ''weak era'' theory although I have elaborated before that there is a player of Djokovic caliber missing in Federer's generation but how freaking hilarious it is seeing Fedtards using the very excuse (clay field) they completely dismiss in different circumstances (overall field).
Do you people make sense to yourselves?
that's because the fedtars are so butthurt and humiliated by certain h2hs: 23-10 lifetime, 5-0
at roland garros and and 13-2
on clay, that their bitterness forces them to rationalize their beloved roger's fiasco of a rivalry against rafa as a case of rafa having merely gotten 'lucky' against a weak field of crap players..
of course, what the fedtards are too stupid too grasp is that, by virtue of saying that rafa's competition is weak as crap, they're automatically also reducing their beloved roger to the category of utter crap..
although, rafa does lead roger and the djoker collectively by a 10-0
margin at roland garros.. so maybe the fedtards have a point after all..