Originally Posted by Rogiman
Look at Becker, at 23 he was already the winner of 5 Slams, and ended up winning only one more Slam, in the twilight of his career.
8 would be pretty darn good for Federer.
For every example, there is an equal and opposite counter example, ever heard of Newton? But seriously, agassi plays a very physical game and won most of his slams later in his career. No need to be so pessimistic.
I have a lot of respect for boris, but to compare boris and federer as players of the same caliber is a bit :retard:
i saw an interview of where boris was asked why he never won any more slams, the reason he said "he lost motivation". If federer had a problem with motivation after last year, we would have seen it.
The fact that federer is so versatile means that he can cater his style to his physical condition very well( as he gets older he can venture into the net a lot more just like sampras when he was losing his legs).