Originally Posted by DDrago2
You realy have problems with logic, do you?
Actually, logic is my specialty.
Frankly, based on the following:
Everyone improves, but no one can become something else than what he is. Nadal can't become another player - he is more or less what he is, we see his game, he is never going to be something else. He will improve, yes, everyone is improving, but he will never be a force on the grass. Federer ousted an in-form Sampras on grass when he was 18, remember? Hewitt and Nalbandian were also a force on Wimbledon very young etc. Yes, Nadal is a clay-corter, and line my words: he will never be even as good as Agassi was on Wimbledon.
Me thinks that you have some comprehension issues, because I never said anything that would have elicited this ridiculous response. If not comprehension issues, you just like quoting people and posting things that are irrelevant to their points.
Just to help you out, I've bolded the only part of this paragraph that had anything to do with what I was saying
And I am not speaking about Borg, but about Nadal.
That's nice. I wasn't speaking about Borg either, my King of logic.
Next time you want to condescend me, try responding to the things that I actually said, and not going on a ridiculous tangent as if you've refuted something that I said :retard: