He's more aggressive than Murray, and he can certainly be more aggressive than some versions of Nadal. Since his fitness became elite he's become more reliant on grinding, but he has the big game from the baseline to play aggressive when he's allowed to step up.
You mean he's been called a pusher less times than Murray has in his career, so you're following the crowd and saying he's more aggressive than Murray.
This is rubbish!
Grinder, counterpuncher, defender, attacker... he has evertyhing but skills at the net.... simple...
Murray is the most complete player on tour.... grinder, counterpuncher, defender, attacker, finesser (if there's even a word lol), ability at the net etc.
There was a discussion saying that Murray would be top 5 in doubles if he focused on doubles and I agree. Watch his lob against young yesterday, the little flick.
Murray and Djokovic are complete player's. Federer and Nadal may have a bigger weapon, in their forehands but they are not as complete as these two.