With all his moon balling and great tactician tennis, wouldn't his game translate well on clay? I don't understand why his results aren't so good on clay. I know he was injuried last year and didn't have a chance to play during the clay court season, but still...
probably for the same reason blake and roddick are not all that efective on clay. their primary weapons are neutralized by dirt. look at what igor andreev did to roddick at roland garros last year. even chela took roddick apart in rome last year.
murray won better than 90% of the points on his first serve against Fedrer and that was the the difference in that match. murray relies heavily on his big serve. if it is working and he is on hard courts, he is likely causing all kinds of problems for his oppoenents. same with roddick. he is defenseless without his serve which is negated byt dirt.
blake is just a high risk player who cannot vary or adjust his game for different surfaces.