How would Nadal fare... - MensTennisForums.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 19 (permalink) Old 06-04-2005, 02:38 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
AnnabelLee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Age: 27
Posts: 252
                     
How would Nadal fare...

against the top claycourters in their primes. Only considering the claycourters of the 90s and 00s because its easier to compare.

So how would Nadal fare against the Bruguera of 93-94, the Muster of 95, Costa in the mid of the 90s, Guga in 00-01, Courier in the early 90s, Ferrero in 02-03 or Coria of 04. or against Gaudio at his best.

Whats your opinion on that. im quite interested. please post

Black List 2005:

Calleri, Berdych, Mayer
AnnabelLee is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 19 (permalink) Old 06-04-2005, 02:41 PM
Forum Umpire:
Gaston Gaudio
 
Action Jackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 124,503
                     
Re: How would Nadal fare...

What's Gaudio doing in that list? Rios and Corretja should be included in that list if you are going to include Coria.

On Nadal bumping him on the changeover, Rosol said: "It's ok, he wanted to take my concentration; I knew he would try something".


Wilander on Dimitrov - "He has mind set on imitating Federer and yes it looks good. But he has no idea what to do on the court".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Filo V. View Post
I definitely would have preferred Gaba winning as he needs the points much more, but Jan would have beaten him anyway. I expect Hajek to destroy Machado, like 6-1 6-2.
Machado wins 6-2 6-1
Action Jackson is offline  
post #3 of 19 (permalink) Old 06-04-2005, 02:44 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
AnnabelLee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Age: 27
Posts: 252
                     
Re: How would Nadal fare...

Quote:
Originally Posted by GeorgeWHitler
What's Gaudio doing in that list? Rios and Corretja should be included in that list if you are going to include Coria.
just took those guys as examples mate

Black List 2005:

Calleri, Berdych, Mayer
AnnabelLee is offline  
post #4 of 19 (permalink) Old 06-04-2005, 02:47 PM
Forum Umpire:
Gaston Gaudio
 
Action Jackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 124,503
                     
Re: How would Nadal fare...

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnnabelLee
just took those guys as examples mate
Nadal isn't in his prime yet, so it's hard to judge.

On Nadal bumping him on the changeover, Rosol said: "It's ok, he wanted to take my concentration; I knew he would try something".


Wilander on Dimitrov - "He has mind set on imitating Federer and yes it looks good. But he has no idea what to do on the court".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Filo V. View Post
I definitely would have preferred Gaba winning as he needs the points much more, but Jan would have beaten him anyway. I expect Hajek to destroy Machado, like 6-1 6-2.
Machado wins 6-2 6-1
Action Jackson is offline  
post #5 of 19 (permalink) Old 06-04-2005, 02:48 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
AnnabelLee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Age: 27
Posts: 252
                     
Re: How would Nadal fare...

yep i know, thought about taking nadal in the form he is in now and the other champs in their primes

Black List 2005:

Calleri, Berdych, Mayer
AnnabelLee is offline  
post #6 of 19 (permalink) Old 06-04-2005, 02:53 PM
Forum Umpire:
Gaston Gaudio
 
Action Jackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 124,503
                     
Re: How would Nadal fare...

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnnabelLee
yep i know, thought about taking nadal in the form he is in now and the other champs in their primes
It's too hard to say just after 1 good year. I don't think he'd beat Muster as they play a similar game, the one difference is that Muster had a better backhand and serve, but Nadal has superior passing shots and can flatten the shots better, but Muster later in his career was much better on hardcourts.

For every one point, another counterpoint could be easily made.

On Nadal bumping him on the changeover, Rosol said: "It's ok, he wanted to take my concentration; I knew he would try something".


Wilander on Dimitrov - "He has mind set on imitating Federer and yes it looks good. But he has no idea what to do on the court".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Filo V. View Post
I definitely would have preferred Gaba winning as he needs the points much more, but Jan would have beaten him anyway. I expect Hajek to destroy Machado, like 6-1 6-2.
Machado wins 6-2 6-1
Action Jackson is offline  
post #7 of 19 (permalink) Old 06-04-2005, 02:59 PM
Registered User
 
Nastase's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 183
                     
Re: How would Nadal fare...

Courier? Coria? What are those two doing here, Courier dominated the french open because in those years the tournament was empty of class claycourt players, he played like a robot and I must add that his tennis was awful. Coria didn't win and for me is a great player but out of determination and bravery in the important moments. If I have to choose one of the players you mentioned to see a duel against Nadal I'll take Muster, the year he won was impossible to beat him even for Nadal although there's no way to prove it. The real Guga would be a great opponent for Rafa too. If you go back even more in the past you will find better players like Borj, McEnroe, Santana, etc... The swedish was just nearly invencible on clay.

"Elengance in an attitude"

Last edited by Nastase; 06-04-2005 at 03:02 PM.
Nastase is offline  
post #8 of 19 (permalink) Old 06-04-2005, 03:02 PM
Forum Umpire:
Gaston Gaudio
 
Action Jackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 124,503
                     
Re: How would Nadal fare...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nastase
Courier? Coria? What are those two doing here, Courier dominated the french open because in those years the tournament was empty of class claycourt players, he played like a robot and Y must add that his tennis was awful.
So true about Courier, and it took Sergi to put that prick in his place.

I mean Lendl and Wilander were much better on clay than McEnroe ever was.

If Nadal wins on Sunday he equals something Muster and Wilander did.

On Nadal bumping him on the changeover, Rosol said: "It's ok, he wanted to take my concentration; I knew he would try something".


Wilander on Dimitrov - "He has mind set on imitating Federer and yes it looks good. But he has no idea what to do on the court".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Filo V. View Post
I definitely would have preferred Gaba winning as he needs the points much more, but Jan would have beaten him anyway. I expect Hajek to destroy Machado, like 6-1 6-2.
Machado wins 6-2 6-1
Action Jackson is offline  
post #9 of 19 (permalink) Old 06-04-2005, 03:08 PM
Registered User
 
Nastase's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 183
                     
Re: How would Nadal fare...

Lendl took advantage of the last years of McEnroe and other great players too, althought John never won RG it's better for me in that surface, he was a genius. Ivan is a better version of Alex Correjta with even better physical qualities but he didn't have the class of John. Wilander was also an amazing claycourt player.

"Elengance in an attitude"
Nastase is offline  
post #10 of 19 (permalink) Old 06-04-2005, 03:09 PM
Registered User
 
Nastase's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 183
                     
Re: How would Nadal fare...

Don't forget about Vilas.

"Elengance in an attitude"
Nastase is offline  
post #11 of 19 (permalink) Old 06-04-2005, 03:13 PM
Forum Umpire:
Gaston Gaudio
 
Action Jackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 124,503
                     
Re: How would Nadal fare...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nastase
Lendl took advantage of the last years of McEnroe and other great players too, althought John never won RG it's better for me in that surface, he was a genius. Ivan is a better version of Alex Correjta with even better physical qualities but he didn't have the class of John. Wilander was also an amazing claycourt player.
Lendl won all of the big events at least once and there is no way I could consider him weaker than McEnroe on this surface on grass for sure or maybe hardcourts, but definitely not on clay.

He didn't have that much talent then again neither did Wilander for that matter, but Lendl for about 7 years was very good on clay and Vilas well one of the best.

On Nadal bumping him on the changeover, Rosol said: "It's ok, he wanted to take my concentration; I knew he would try something".


Wilander on Dimitrov - "He has mind set on imitating Federer and yes it looks good. But he has no idea what to do on the court".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Filo V. View Post
I definitely would have preferred Gaba winning as he needs the points much more, but Jan would have beaten him anyway. I expect Hajek to destroy Machado, like 6-1 6-2.
Machado wins 6-2 6-1
Action Jackson is offline  
post #12 of 19 (permalink) Old 06-04-2005, 07:59 PM
Registered User
 
Nastase's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 183
                     
Re: How would Nadal fare...

That's your opinion, for me Lendl has always been overstimated, he was a tough player but his tennis was extremely boring and out of resources. As I told you Corretja reminds me of him a lot.

"Elengance in an attitude"
Nastase is offline  
post #13 of 19 (permalink) Old 06-04-2005, 08:37 PM
Fed Fo Mod
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On vacation...
Age: 45
Posts: 11,233
                     
Re: How would Nadal fare...

Yep, Courier was only good on clay because nobody was around that was a good claycourter. Would it hurt to give the guy some credit? I know his tennis was uninspired but he had a great run on clay beating the likes of Sergi, Costa, Muster, Agassi, Mancini, and others. He retrieved the ball really well, and was incredibly consistent from both wings. He harldy gave away a point.

Lendl was a great on clay and I don't see how anyone can argue with that. McEnroe never cared about playing on clay. In his greatest year, 1984, he only played at Forrest Hills and the World Team Cup before RG. He owned everyone on clay at those events through pure prodigious talents and let the 84 final get away. In the years '80-'83, he would only play RG and maybe one other tournament on clay and do fairly well. He wasn't by any means a great claycourter, just a great player who could win anywhere due to his prodigious talents. He never even tried to get better on clay.
NYCtennisfan is offline  
post #14 of 19 (permalink) Old 06-05-2005, 12:04 PM
Forum Umpire:
Gaston Gaudio
 
Action Jackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 124,503
                     
Re: How would Nadal fare...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nastase
That's your opinion, for me Lendl has always been overstimated, he was a tough player but his tennis was extremely boring and out of resources. As I told you Corretja reminds me of him a lot.
I never said Lendl played beautiful tennis or was gifted, he made the most of what he had and was very good on clay during that period I said earlier I mean he is not a patch on Borg, but who is.

On Nadal bumping him on the changeover, Rosol said: "It's ok, he wanted to take my concentration; I knew he would try something".


Wilander on Dimitrov - "He has mind set on imitating Federer and yes it looks good. But he has no idea what to do on the court".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Filo V. View Post
I definitely would have preferred Gaba winning as he needs the points much more, but Jan would have beaten him anyway. I expect Hajek to destroy Machado, like 6-1 6-2.
Machado wins 6-2 6-1
Action Jackson is offline  
post #15 of 19 (permalink) Old 06-05-2005, 12:07 PM
Forum Umpire:
Gaston Gaudio
 
Action Jackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 124,503
                     
Re: How would Nadal fare...

Quote:
Originally Posted by NYCtennisfan
Yep, Courier was only good on clay because nobody was around that was a good claycourter. Would it hurt to give the guy some credit? I know his tennis was uninspired but he had a great run on clay beating the likes of Sergi, Costa, Muster, Agassi, Mancini, and others. He retrieved the ball really well, and was incredibly consistent from both wings. He harldy gave away a point.
Courier got fortunate that Wilander and Lendl were not forces and that's the same for Agassi as well, you mentioned Mancini he had one good year in 89 as for Muster he wasn't at his best till later. I mean once Rosset showed up Courier on clay, then Bruguera finished the job and he wasn't the same afterwards, and he was interim before the good claycourters really came through.

On Nadal bumping him on the changeover, Rosol said: "It's ok, he wanted to take my concentration; I knew he would try something".


Wilander on Dimitrov - "He has mind set on imitating Federer and yes it looks good. But he has no idea what to do on the court".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Filo V. View Post
I definitely would have preferred Gaba winning as he needs the points much more, but Jan would have beaten him anyway. I expect Hajek to destroy Machado, like 6-1 6-2.
Machado wins 6-2 6-1
Action Jackson is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome