What a bunch of a great arguments we have here. It's really rewarding discuss tennis with such privileged minds.
yes , but you can`t refuse the arguments.
for you , it`s better ferrer or 35 years old haas than old agassi?????
agassi was a legend of the game , ferrer with less archivements that "weak era players" like nalby or davydenko , or coria it`s nº3......
and they were nº3 with proper ages , not with near 31 years old and one only masters1000 ( the less important of all , many elite players skip paris)
for you agassi in final of us open 2005 is weak era , for me it`s weak era ferrer in nº3 and old haas with many injurys near the top-10 and beating djoko in one of his favourite surfaces...........
and talking of wimbly , it`s true than in 2001 the organizers changes the grass , before 2001 was 75% a kind of grass but after 2000 was 100& .
but the grass is not the problem , the problem is the heavy balls than use many years after and the cut of the grass too , more larger provoques a more slow bounce.
wimbly was not the same after 2006.....much more slower.