US OPEN should pay more than $32,000 to first round losers. - MensTennisForums.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 46 (permalink) Old 08-20-2013, 03:15 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,195
                     
US OPEN should pay more than $32,000 to first round losers.

Wimbledon paid $35,000 to the first round losers but I am surprised the US OPEN is only paying $32,000 to the first round losers.

I do like that the prize money reaches $53,000 for the second round then $93,000 for the third round. However, I think the first round loser prize money is still too low they deserve more money.

The US OPEN should be paying $40,000 dollars to the first round losers. Tennis is extremely expensive, to pay for flights around the world, coaching, training. I know the grand slams provide players with food. Does anyone know if the ATP Tour helps players out to pay for a hotel room during a grand slam?
polarisgalaxy is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 46 (permalink) Old 08-20-2013, 07:55 AM
Registered User
 
August's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Age: 25
Posts: 5,468
                     
Re: US OPEN should pay more than $32,000 to first round losers.

R1 prize money must not be too high, otherwise injured players with a direct MD entry will come to tank for $$$.

Stan Wawrinka
2014 Australian Open Champion | 2014 Monte Carlo Masters Champion | 2015 French Open Champion

Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
2008 Paris Masters Champion | 2014 Toronto Masters Champion

My Twitter
August is offline  
post #3 of 46 (permalink) Old 08-20-2013, 08:38 AM
Registered User
 
ossie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Age: 30
Posts: 6,424
                     
Re: US OPEN should pay more than $32,000 to first round losers.

If anything it should be less, preferrably way less. Players should be incentivised to win not to come collect their welfare check.
ossie is offline  
post #4 of 46 (permalink) Old 08-20-2013, 08:43 AM
Registered User
 
Sombrerero loco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Age: 27
Posts: 61,541
                     
Re: US OPEN should pay more than $32,000 to first round losers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ossie View Post
If anything it should be less, preferrably way less. Players should be incentivised to win not to come collect their welfare check.
this. they should better increase money for qualifiers rather than for first round losers, imo

32000 dollars is way too much

Henri KONTINEN

Jaume Pla Malfeito/Bernard the aTomic /Thanasi Kokkinakis/Tomas Pusic Whitmore

John Millman /Marcus Willis/Taro Daniel-Alex de Miρaur-Josh Milton


Henkka Kontinen
-Nick Kyrgios-Pierre Hugues Herbert-Alex Bolt-Javier Martν-Evan Hoyt-Brydan Klein-Chris Rungkat-Andres Artuρedo-Hugo Nys-Pol Toledo
www.tennisalternative.com
Sombrerero loco is offline  
post #5 of 46 (permalink) Old 08-20-2013, 09:01 AM
country flag T.C
Registered User
 
T.C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,068
                     
Re: US OPEN should pay more than $32,000 to first round losers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by polarisgalaxy View Post
...Does anyone know if the ATP Tour helps players out to pay for a hotel room during a grand slam?
The US Open pays Main Draw players $230 per diem as long as they are in the main draw + 3 days. Rate, using the ATP discount, is $225/night at the official ATP hotel; this is a significant discount to the rack rate of $500-600+/night. The players stay in a very nice hotel.

Qualifying players receive a significantly less generous package: $115 per diem + 2 days.
T.C is offline  
post #6 of 46 (permalink) Old 08-20-2013, 09:15 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,795
                     
Re: US OPEN should pay more than $32,000 to first round losers.

What I would do:
-Increase the R1 prize money for qualifiers.
-Pay direct entries the difference IF they reach R2.
-Make the real significant raises for R3 and R4.

I.e. if a qualifier and direct entry both lose in R1, the qualifier gets more money. If they both advance to R2, they get the same.

This gives qualifiers who are at the lower parts of the rankings a further boost to their usually strained economy, well deserved after winning three matches.

And it says to direct entries, if you wanna earn more money, show up and win a match. It's not like $32K just to show up isn't significant, after flights etc. they still have roughly $30k left..
Jomp1 is offline  
post #7 of 46 (permalink) Old 08-20-2013, 09:24 AM
Registered User
 
sheva07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,775
                     
Re: US OPEN should pay more than $32,000 to first round losers.

$32k is still ridiculous IMO. Look at the prize money in Challengers and Futures for example. They are way too low.

Berdych - Tsonga - Wawrinka - Del Potro - Gasquet - F.Lopez - Monfils - Haas - Janowicz - Youzhny - Tomic - Llodra - Hewitt - Gulbis - Mahut - Haase - Schoorel - Sijsling - Huta Galung - De Bakker - Van der Duim - Westerhof - Middelkoop - Koolhof - Lootsma - Meuffels - Sels - Van Rijthoven

All time: Safin - Schalken - Krajicek - Sluiter - Verkerk - Henman - Ivanisevic - Nalbandian - Ferrero - Philippoussis - Sampras - Siemerink - Blake - F.Gonzalez - Ancic - Haarhuis/Eltingh

Still supporting all the Dutchies despite their great choking skills
sheva07 is offline  
post #8 of 46 (permalink) Old 08-20-2013, 11:09 AM
Registered User
 
August's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Age: 25
Posts: 5,468
                     
Re: US OPEN should pay more than $32,000 to first round losers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jomp1 View Post
What I would do:
-Increase the R1 prize money for qualifiers.
-Pay direct entries the difference IF they reach R2.
-Make the real significant raises for R3 and R4.

I.e. if a qualifier and direct entry both lose in R1, the qualifier gets more money. If they both advance to R2, they get the same.

This gives qualifiers who are at the lower parts of the rankings a further boost to their usually strained economy, well deserved after winning three matches.

And it says to direct entries, if you wanna earn more money, show up and win a match. It's not like $32K just to show up isn't significant, after flights etc. they still have roughly $30k left..
It really sucks that you get the same money if you lost on R1 after qualies or if you get a direct entry.

Stan Wawrinka
2014 Australian Open Champion | 2014 Monte Carlo Masters Champion | 2015 French Open Champion

Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
2008 Paris Masters Champion | 2014 Toronto Masters Champion

My Twitter
August is offline  
post #9 of 46 (permalink) Old 08-20-2013, 11:12 AM
Registered User
 
RIboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,533
                     
Re: US OPEN should pay more than $32,000 to first round losers.

i seriously need to ask for a WC next year
RIboy is offline  
post #10 of 46 (permalink) Old 08-20-2013, 11:22 AM
Federer Fan & Dull Hater
 
duarte_a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 11,068
                     
Re: US OPEN should pay more than $32,000 to first round losers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by polarisgalaxy View Post
Wimbledon paid $35,000 to the first round losers but I am surprised the US OPEN is only paying $32,000 to the first round losers.

I do like that the prize money reaches $53,000 for the second round then $93,000 for the third round. However, I think the first round loser prize money is still too low they deserve more money.

The US OPEN should be paying $40,000 dollars to the first round losers. Tennis is extremely expensive, to pay for flights around the world, coaching, training. I know the grand slams provide players with food. Does anyone know if the ATP Tour helps players out to pay for a hotel room during a grand slam?
Imo we have to look at %s and not absolute numbers. How much do the 32.000$ represent out of the entire prize money?

duarte_a is offline  
post #11 of 46 (permalink) Old 08-20-2013, 12:53 PM
Registered User
 
randomtennisfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 5,835
                     
Re: US OPEN should pay more than $32,000 to first round losers.

The winner gets 2.6 million dollars, how unnecessary is that?

First round and qualies are the ones who likely need the money the most so they should get as much as possible

Tsonga & Murray fan


Hope for good things from Pablo Carreno-Busta
randomtennisfan is offline  
post #12 of 46 (permalink) Old 08-20-2013, 12:57 PM
Registered User
 
Dmitry Verdasco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,098
                     
Re: US OPEN should pay more than $32,000 to first round losers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ossie View Post
If anything it should be less, preferrably way less. Players should be incentivised to win not to come collect their welfare check.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sombrerero loco View Post
this. they should better increase money for qualifiers rather than for first round losers, imo

32000 dollars is way too much
I agree.

It should be enough to cover the expenses of you and your team, and a little bit extra. $32000? People who lose R1 at every slam and do nothing else are already on $120K a year! Ridic.

Not to say it should go to the winners. Everyone is getting well and truly enough, and it should be invested back into the sport at grass roots level.

MARTiNA HiNGiS
| 10 x Australian Open Champion | 2 x Roland Garros Champion |
| 5 x Wimbledon Champion | 4 x US Open Champion | 5 x YEC Champion |





• Nadal • Philippoussis • Gasquet • Tursunov • Nalbandian • Safin • Bolelli • Tomic • Borg •
• Kournikova • Dokic • Golovin • Dementieva • Myskina • Mirza • Pliskova • Gavrilova • Rubin • Pierce •
Dmitry Verdasco is offline  
post #13 of 46 (permalink) Old 08-20-2013, 01:19 PM
Banned!
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 4,120
                     
Re: US OPEN should pay more than $32,000 to first round losers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by polarisgalaxy View Post
Does anyone know if the ATP Tour helps players out to pay for a hotel room during a grand slam?
I'm pretty sure the ATP allows players to claim expenses, or at least it used to.
underspin is offline  
post #14 of 46 (permalink) Old 08-20-2013, 01:46 PM
Registered User
 
Dmitry Verdasco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,098
                     
Re: US OPEN should pay more than $32,000 to first round losers.

Most motels will put up the TOP 20 for nothing, just to spruik about them staying there.

I stayed at Crown during AO last year and Flavia Pennetta was in the room next to us, Troicki and Dolgopolov were on the same floor. Flavia said she got to stay there for free so I'm assuming the TOP 20 atleast gets that at slams.....

MARTiNA HiNGiS
| 10 x Australian Open Champion | 2 x Roland Garros Champion |
| 5 x Wimbledon Champion | 4 x US Open Champion | 5 x YEC Champion |





• Nadal • Philippoussis • Gasquet • Tursunov • Nalbandian • Safin • Bolelli • Tomic • Borg •
• Kournikova • Dokic • Golovin • Dementieva • Myskina • Mirza • Pliskova • Gavrilova • Rubin • Pierce •
Dmitry Verdasco is offline  
post #15 of 46 (permalink) Old 08-20-2013, 01:55 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,879
                     
Re: US OPEN should pay more than $32,000 to first round losers.

The players receive far too little of the money earned by tournaments as a percentage of the gross, regardless of what some posters think here of "welfare."

Without the players there would be no tour and hardly just "anyone" makes it into a slam.
tribalfusion is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome