Top sports statistican: Connors best in open era. Borg 2nd. Fed 3rd. Sampras 14th. - Page 2 - MensTennisForums.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #16 of 55 (permalink) Old 06-24-2013, 03:56 PM
Registered User
 
Dougie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,907
                     
Re: Top sports statistican: Connors best in open era. Borg 2nd. Fed 3rd. Sampras 14th

I´d like to see the actual model, because both the results and the verbal explanation seem quite ridicilous, really. Then again, who am I to say anything, I have absolutely no idea what the levels of guys like Bertolucci or Barazzutti were....
Dougie is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #17 of 55 (permalink) Old 06-24-2013, 04:11 PM
Registered User
 
pierricbross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 680
                     
Re: Top sports statistican: Connors best in open era. Borg 2nd. Fed 3rd. Sampras 14th

Quote:
Originally Posted by article
Connors performed in the years when he was playing against Ivan Lendl, who played against Becker, who played against Sampras who played against Agassi, who was still reaching Grand Slam finals when Federer

.........

pierricbross is offline  
post #18 of 55 (permalink) Old 06-24-2013, 04:22 PM
Registered User
 
Timot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Age: 30
Posts: 2,326
                     
Re: Top sports statistican: Connors best in open era. Borg 2nd. Fed 3rd. Sampras 14th

Quote:
Originally Posted by philosophicalarf View Post
Sampras won 8 of his 14 slams in the second half of the 90s, when it's fairly obvious the competition was not at its most formidable (Carlos Moya at world number one speaks for itself). 1990-92 was extremely strong, probably the best period of all time, and he only made two finals there.

On the other hand, imo his peak Wimbledon level was so high he'd likely have won most even against stronger opponents.
Sampras was 18-20 years-old and before his prime in 1990-1992. It's still great that he managed to win US Open, beating Lendl, McEnroe and Agassi on the way. Apart from that win and USO 1992 final (he beat world no.1 in semis), he also got to 2 QF and 1 semi in Slams at that period. So I wouldn't call it "only".

I agree with the second part of your post.
Timot is offline  
post #19 of 55 (permalink) Old 06-24-2013, 04:33 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,960
                     
Re: Top sports statistican: Connors best in open era. Borg 2nd. Fed 3rd. Sampras 14th

Lendl 10th



It`s a joke list
Julián Santiago is offline  
post #20 of 55 (permalink) Old 06-24-2013, 08:57 PM
Registered User
 
Net Cord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 355
                     
Re: Top sports statistican: Connors best in open era. Borg 2nd. Fed 3rd. Sampras 14th

Quote:
Originally Posted by philosophicalarf View Post
Sampras won 8 of his 14 slams in the second half of the 90s, when it's fairly obvious the competition was not at its most formidable (Carlos Moya at world number one speaks for itself). 1990-92 was extremely strong, probably the best period of all time, and he only made two finals there.

On the other hand, imo his peak Wimbledon level was so high he'd likely have won most even against stronger opponents.
Looking at Sampras' Majors from 1995-1999:

1995 Wimbledon: beat Ivanišević and Becker

1995 U.S. Open: beat (a young) Philippoussis, Todd Martin, Jim Courier, and Andre Agassi

1996 U.S. Open: beat Jiří Novák, Alexander Volkov, Philippoussis, Àlex Corretja, Ivanišević, and Michael Chang

1997 Australian Open: beat Albert Costa, Thomas Muster, and Carlos Moyà

1997 Wimbledon: beat Petr Korda, Boris Becker, and Cédric Pioline

1998 WImbledon: beat Thomas Enqvist, Philippoussis, Henman, and Ivanišević

1999 Wimbledon: beat Philippoussis (who retired in the 2nd set), Henman, and Agassi.

Besides the 1997 Australian Open, I don't see an easy Major win among Pete's second half of the '90s tally, and, even there, he had to beat 3 players who had or would win Majors (albeit all 3 at the French), 2 of whom were ranked #1. At Wimbledon '95, he beat 2 Wimbledon champions. At U.S. Open '95, he beat a U.S. Open champion and three finalists. At '96 U.S. Open, he beat 2 Major Champions and 2 Major finalists. At '97 WImbledon, he beat a 3 time Wimbledon champion. At '98 WImbledon, he beat a WImbledon champion and a Wimbledon finalist. And, at '99 Wimbledon, he beat a Wimbledon champion and a Wimbledon finalist (who got injured).
Net Cord is offline  
post #21 of 55 (permalink) Old 06-24-2013, 10:16 PM
Registered User
 
Uncle Latso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Age: 39
Posts: 12,609
                     
Re: Top sports statistican: Connors best in open era. Borg 2nd. Fed 3rd. Sampras 14th

I just used the model for the actual Wimby and it shows a new favorite for the tittle - Steve Darcis



Quote:
Originally Posted by Abel View Post
Dimitrov will never win anything above 250 level.
Rome R1 Zverev def. Dimitrov -
Quote:
Originally Posted by augus View Post
I never wrote this about active player after lost match but seriously - Dimitrov should retire from tennis.
Uncle Latso is offline  
post #22 of 55 (permalink) Old 06-24-2013, 10:23 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,004
                     
Re: Top sports statistican: Connors best in open era. Borg 2nd. Fed 3rd. Sampras 14th

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle_Johansen View Post
"Sampras’s 14 Grand Slams are still hugely impressive, but he achieved them when the depth of competition for titles had never been weaker."

This person seems to think opposite of what everyone else does.
BULLSHIT! The Federer era 03-08, was the weakest period in recent tennis.
thrust is offline  
post #23 of 55 (permalink) Old 06-24-2013, 10:23 PM
Registered User
 
LaFuria's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,999
                     
Re: Top sports statistican: Connors best in open era. Borg 2nd. Fed 3rd. Sampras 14th

The results alone pretty much kill whatever credibility that could have.

Quote:
Originally Posted by thrust View Post
BULLSHIT! The Federer era 03-08, was the weakest period in recent tennis.
The last 5 years say hi.
LaFuria is offline  
post #24 of 55 (permalink) Old 06-24-2013, 10:25 PM
Registered User
 
Kyle_Johansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Age: 24
Posts: 9,116
                     
Re: Top sports statistican: Connors best in open era. Borg 2nd. Fed 3rd. Sampras 14th

So you think an era in which your precious Nadal won 5 GS titles was weak.

Federer fan, writer, tennis player.
Top 10 all-time list (Open Era)
1) Federer 2) Sampras 3) Nadal 4) Laver 5) Borg
6) Rosewall 7) Agassi 8) Lendl 9) Connors 10) McEnroe
Top 10 favourite all-time list
1) Federer 2) Safin 3) Agassi 4) Sampras 5) Edberg
6) Lendl 7) Haas 8) Hewitt 9) Connors 10) Becker
Kyle_Johansen is offline  
post #25 of 55 (permalink) Old 06-24-2013, 11:52 PM
Registered User
 
Snowwy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: A place that's too cold.
Posts: 23,470
                     
Re: Top sports statistican: Connors best in open era. Borg 2nd. Fed 3rd. Sampras 14th

Oh no, a site doesn't agree with some people. It's author must be dumb, stupid and brainless....

Peter Polansky
Nestor - Chvojka - Pospisil - Raonic - Peliwo
Snowwy is offline  
post #26 of 55 (permalink) Old 06-24-2013, 11:59 PM
Registered User
 
Burrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,444
                     
Re: Top sports statistican: Connors best in open era. Borg 2nd. Fed 3rd. Sampras 14th

Quote:
Originally Posted by thrust View Post
BULLSHIT! The Federer era 03-08, was the weakest period in recent tennis.
This doesn't even make any sense.

2003 was a completely different era from 2006 even.
Burrow is offline  
post #27 of 55 (permalink) Old 06-25-2013, 12:06 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,004
                     
Re: Top sports statistican: Connors best in open era. Borg 2nd. Fed 3rd. Sampras 14th

Quote:
Originally Posted by jonas View Post
Okey. This seem a bit mathematical for my liking.
And you can definitely argue about its validness.
Interesting read however.

Ahead of the Wimbledon Championships, and after inputting the results of more than 20,000 Grand Slam matches involving over 1,000 players into his highly sophisticated computer model, one of the UK’s leading sports statisticians believes he has the answer: it’s Jimmy Connors.

https://theconversation.com/forget-f...greatest-15431
http://manchestergazette.co.uk/conno...-statistician/
I do think Connors is underrated, especially here, but the criteria used here borders on the absurd. The Connors-Lendl-Borg-McEnroe era was not tougher than the Sampras-Becker-Edberg-Wilander-Agassi era. A win is a win, no matter how difficult or easy. True, Sampras was weak on clay, but Connors or McEnroe weren't much better. I do think slams get too much credit when considering a players greatness, but Pete did win multiple slams on 3 different surfaces. Borg never won a hard court slam, and the fact that he didn't play much in Australia, means little as he had several chances at the USO and failed.
thrust is offline  
post #28 of 55 (permalink) Old 06-25-2013, 12:23 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,004
                     
Re: Top sports statistican: Connors best in open era. Borg 2nd. Fed 3rd. Sampras 14th

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaFuria View Post
The results alone pretty much kill whatever credibility that could have.



The last 5 years say hi.
How many slams has Federer won the past 5 years? His first 5 year slam main competition was against: Hewitt, mid thirties Agassi, Nalbandian, Roddick, Baghdadis, Safin and even lesser players. The came Nadal, who could not win a slam off clay till 09, then Novak who did not reach his peak till 2011. Pete had Agassi, Becker, Edberg, Wilander, Chang, and Courier among others to contend with. The Connors-Borg- Lendl McEnore era was also much tougher than Roger's 03-08 as well as the 09-13 period.
thrust is offline  
post #29 of 55 (permalink) Old 06-25-2013, 12:43 AM
Registered User
 
fast_clay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: ₫ṿﻁᶫỉᾔﺍᶏ
Posts: 15,727
                     
Re: Top sports statistican: Connors best in open era. Borg 2nd. Fed 3rd. Sampras 14th

http://www.yokozunatennis.blogspot.ie/

this is where you find true definition

Quote:
Originally Posted by SelvenluvJo View Post
why are you so seriously
fast_clay is offline  
post #30 of 55 (permalink) Old 06-25-2013, 12:43 AM
Registered User
 
Looner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 13,270
                     
Re: Top sports statistican: Connors best in open era. Borg 2nd. Fed 3rd. Sampras 14th

How about "No"?


The "Who plays tennis?" thread


Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocket Rod Laver
Roger is like a good red wine, he’s getting better with age.
Looner is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome