The same can be said for multiple Wimbledon titles Roger won. Especially that 5 setter against Roddick, one of the luckiest slam final wins ever. Roger could very well have 2-3 less Grass slams. It's true he won 7 of them but his luck has to end sometime.
See what I did there?
If Roger had 3 slams less he would have 14. Still the most in the open era.
Roger never won a slam having to save MPs along the way.
My post was in response to the idea that Djokovic can/has dominatd the HC slams.
My point was that while he won the last 3 AOs and won the 2011 USO he could very well have not won 3 of those and as such his domination is not so clear as the #s may make you think.