Originally Posted by Wing Man Frank
Worth nothing that those who have won Slams have achieved significantly more than Raonic by the age of 22.
Worth noting again that I have only included them reaching the quarters as minimum. In some cases the players had gone onto the semis, finals, or even to win the event (Nadal for example).
The fact that you're even comparing him to five slam winners (including three of the greatest of all time) and consistent top 10 guys like Tsonga and Berdych suggests once again that you actually think Raonic is quite good and that his future could be a very successful one. Otherwise, I see no reason for you to do this. I don't even do such a thing myself.
And yes, it's true that Milos is a late developer compared to most elite players. His first year on tour was as a 20 year old. Why this means he hasn't improved significantly over the last two years, I'm not sure. Although it seems that maybe you've given up that particular trolling tangent like the others and are now pathetically going on about how far he's behind all-time greats like Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal. Hilarious stuff.