WG QF: Rosol def. Golubev 4-6 6-4 6-2 7-6 (6) (CZE 2-0 KAZ) - MensTennisForums.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 29 (permalink) Old 04-05-2013, 11:06 AM Thread Starter
Forum Umpire:
Gaston Gaudio
 
Action Jackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 124,507
                     
WG QF: Rosol def. Golubev 4-6 6-4 6-2 7-6 (6) (CZE 2-0 KAZ)

Of course this was a fine battle of tactics. Golubev served for the 4th set at *5-4, but couldn't get it done.

Rosol was the steadier and delivered Golubev's first defeat at home in a DC tie. Not bad from the reserves to be leading 2-0

On Nadal bumping him on the changeover, Rosol said: "It's ok, he wanted to take my concentration; I knew he would try something".


Wilander on Dimitrov - "He has mind set on imitating Federer and yes it looks good. But he has no idea what to do on the court".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Filo V. View Post
I definitely would have preferred Gaba winning as he needs the points much more, but Jan would have beaten him anyway. I expect Hajek to destroy Machado, like 6-1 6-2.
Machado wins 6-2 6-1
Action Jackson is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 29 (permalink) Old 04-05-2013, 11:15 AM
Banned!
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 12,122
                     
Re: WG QF: Rosol def. Golubev 4-6 6-4 6-2 7-6 (6) (CZE 2-0 KAZ)

expected.
motorhead is offline  
post #3 of 29 (permalink) Old 04-05-2013, 11:17 AM
Registered User
 
Puschkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 15,915
                     
Re: WG QF: Rosol def. Golubev 4-6 6-4 6-2 7-6 (6) (CZE 2-0 KAZ)

Quote:
Originally Posted by motorhead View Post
expected.
I got this one totally wrong.

______________________________

~♠ Gasquetaires ♠~

un pour tous, tous pour un
‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
Puschkin is offline  
post #4 of 29 (permalink) Old 04-05-2013, 11:21 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,722
                     
Re: WG QF: Rosol def. Golubev 4-6 6-4 6-2 7-6 (6) (CZE 2-0 KAZ)

Lukas...Almost Top 50 now with this win
JamieMU30 is offline  
post #5 of 29 (permalink) Old 04-05-2013, 11:27 AM
Banned!
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sen'jin Village
Age: 32
Posts: 18,509
                     
Re: WG QF: Rosol def. Golubev 4-6 6-4 6-2 7-6 (6) (CZE 2-0 KAZ)

Not such a difficult task to defeat a choking mug like Craplubev
Topspindoctor is offline  
post #6 of 29 (permalink) Old 04-05-2013, 11:35 AM
Registered User
 
Sombrerero loco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Age: 27
Posts: 61,615
                     
Re: WG QF: Rosol def. Golubev 4-6 6-4 6-2 7-6 (6) (CZE 2-0 KAZ)

noooo

Henri KONTINEN

Jaume Pla Malfeito/Bernard the aTomic /Thanasi Kokkinakis/Tomas Pusic Whitmore

John Millman /Marcus Willis/Taro Daniel-Alex de Miñaur-Josh Milton


Henkka Kontinen
-Nick Kyrgios-Pierre Hugues Herbert-Alex Bolt-Javier Martí-Evan Hoyt-Brydan Klein-Chris Rungkat-Andres Artuñedo-Hugo Nys-Pol Toledo
www.tennisalternative.com
Sombrerero loco is offline  
post #7 of 29 (permalink) Old 04-05-2013, 11:37 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,722
                     
Re: WG QF: Rosol def. Golubev 4-6 6-4 6-2 7-6 (6) (CZE 2-0 KAZ)

Quote:
Originally Posted by duong View Post
Rosol made surprisingly few winners and unforced errors in this match, Golubev the opposite.

In the tie-break, Golubev led 5-4 with the serve but lost 2 points, Rosol served for it but lost the match point 6-6, then led 7-6, Golubev serving, who lost that point : 8-6 for Rosol.

From my calculation, Rosol will reach his carreer-high ranking at 54 or better.

(I assumed that one can't cumulate the 65 points from a win in Davis cup quarterfinal with the 10 points from playing a live rubber iwthout winning in the first round, which I think I checked in previous years but I've not documented it well then I'm not 100% sure : if anybody gave me an example, I would be reassured )
I think that is wrong...Calculations show he should be around 51 with this win
JamieMU30 is offline  
post #8 of 29 (permalink) Old 04-05-2013, 11:43 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,722
                     
Re: WG QF: Rosol def. Golubev 4-6 6-4 6-2 7-6 (6) (CZE 2-0 KAZ)

Quote:
Originally Posted by duong View Post
the difference between both is cumulating the 65 points with the 10 points from first round as I mentioned between blankets.

If you have any evidence that they can be cumulated, I would be glad
I think you are right but I have him with 810 points, sitting at #52 in the rankings, tied with Ramos at #51
JamieMU30 is offline  
post #9 of 29 (permalink) Old 04-05-2013, 11:47 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,722
                     
Re: WG QF: Rosol def. Golubev 4-6 6-4 6-2 7-6 (6) (CZE 2-0 KAZ)

Quote:
Originally Posted by duong View Post
he would have 810 points if he had 75 points from Davis cup, that is 65+10, not if he can't cumulate, that is if he got 65 points only
I think for this win he only got 57 points...753+57=810

If he had 75 points from Davis Cup he would be at 753+65=818

There is a 2 point discrepancy somewhere...Who knows from where

He should be at 51 or 52 I think! Ready to crack the Top 50
JamieMU30 is offline  
post #10 of 29 (permalink) Old 04-05-2013, 11:50 AM
-LIFETIME SCIENTIST-
 
redshift36188's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Age: 30
Posts: 7,576
                     
Re: WG QF: Rosol def. Golubev 4-6 6-4 6-2 7-6 (6) (CZE 2-0 KAZ)

Quote:
Originally Posted by duong View Post
the difference between both is cumulating the 65 points with the 10 points from first round as I mentioned between blankets.

If you have any evidence that they can be cumulated, I would be glad

but even if I have not documented it, I think I checked that it's not possible (it's possible to cumulate with the points from play-offs but that's something else)
The rules don't mention anything about the 10 points from R1 loss being a special case but I guess we'll find out next Monday.

redshift36188 is offline  
post #11 of 29 (permalink) Old 04-05-2013, 11:55 AM
Rankings Master
 
Slasher1985's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Age: 30
Posts: 12,880
                     
Re: WG QF: Rosol def. Golubev 4-6 6-4 6-2 7-6 (6) (CZE 2-0 KAZ)

Rosol is going to have 810 points with this win.
Slasher1985 is online now  
post #12 of 29 (permalink) Old 04-05-2013, 11:57 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,722
                     
Re: WG QF: Rosol def. Golubev 4-6 6-4 6-2 7-6 (6) (CZE 2-0 KAZ)

[QUOTE=duong;14485354]the Davis cup result has to replace the worst optional result before, which was 18 points[/

Are you sure the worst optional result is 10 and not 18? All I know is that I have him at 51 or 52 and I am sticking with that story Guess the rankings on Monday will show
JamieMU30 is offline  
post #13 of 29 (permalink) Old 04-05-2013, 11:57 AM
Rankings Master
 
Slasher1985's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Age: 30
Posts: 12,880
                     
Re: WG QF: Rosol def. Golubev 4-6 6-4 6-2 7-6 (6) (CZE 2-0 KAZ)

The exact explanation is this one:

Rosol has 10 DC points, which are out of his countables.

With this win he gets to 75 DC points, 10 for R1, 65 from QF.

This 75 replaces his worst result of 18 points, thus he gains 57 effective points.
Slasher1985 is online now  
post #14 of 29 (permalink) Old 04-05-2013, 11:59 AM
Registered User
 
GSMnadal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Netherlands
Age: 24
Posts: 16,533
                     
Re: WG QF: Rosol def. Golubev 4-6 6-4 6-2 7-6 (6) (CZE 2-0 KAZ)

MTF's dream match this. No pushing, tactics, topspin, rallies or brain use whatsoever in this one.

RAFAEL NADAL

'Rafael Nadal is the best ever' - John McEnroe

1 AO - 9 RG - 2 W - 2 USO
GSMnadal is offline  
post #15 of 29 (permalink) Old 04-05-2013, 12:01 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,722
                     
Re: WG QF: Rosol def. Golubev 4-6 6-4 6-2 7-6 (6) (CZE 2-0 KAZ)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slasher1985 View Post
The exact explanation is this one:

Rosol has 10 DC points, which are out of his countables.

With this win he gets to 75 DC points, 10 for R1, 65 from QF.

This 75 replaces his worst result of 18 points, thus he gains 57 effective points.
Thanks, that makes sense!! I knew I had 810 as being right...So will he be at 51 or 52? If you are tied with someone, doesn't the player playing that week or reaching those points come first in the rankings?
JamieMU30 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome