You mean the Davydenko that has a positive H2H vs Nadal and who in 09 won the WTF beating the players that currently make up the ATP top? Btw, Roddick also did pretty well against Nadal. Yet they are Fed's turkeys and therefore you disrespect them. But be my guest, go ahead and further diminish Fed's competition, like Gonzo in AO07 who destroyed Nadal but couldn't overcome Federer. There are countless examples like that.
H2H is really the Nadaltards' one and only argument (as if the point of tennis was beating 1 player
). They're not even realizing that the asspicker only leads that H2H because of a very lucky matchup situation and so many matches with clay as the surface.
Hey! It's my favourite poster, how you doing?
Yeah, the Davydenko that never reached a slam final and only was able to beat Rafa in meaningless warm up events, that Davy
I like Roddick very much, but having him as your main rival is not great competition. The accounts that Nadal was destroyed by these players, was when he was 20-21 and still finding his game outside of clay and these guys were in their peak, that doesn't make it any less of a weak era in which 'Jesus'Fed flourished.
H2H, well, the difference with the H2H of Davy is is that Nadal thouroghly dominated Roger on the big stage. Federer only beat him twice seven and six years ago. The 'lucky match up' reason is just an excuse to why you're not good enough to beat a player. So many more matches on clay, yeah a staggering 3 more than they've had hardcourt encounters.