why not? muzza believes his best surface is clay and I dont think there is much between him and djoko on the surface, not compared to muzza's superiority on grass anyway. He has a chance and will certainly beat Ferru on his best surface.
Is he deranged or something?
Not sure if trolling or just stupid.
Actually, I'm sick of this shit. Murray is better than Djokovic on grass based on waht? He won the Olympics? Bcs he won 1 match 7-5 7-5? Bcs he beat Fed and Novak didn't? He lost 1st time he faced Fed on grass, so did Novak. Novak didn't get the 2dn chance.
Wimbledon champion>non-Wimbledon champion.
Really tired of everybody saying 'Wimbledon champ sucks on grass'.
Novak has results on clay to back up 'better than Murray on clay' talk. Where are those Murray's awesome results on grass?
I can understand people saying Murray is slightly better on grass, but saying 'he is soo superior to Novak on grass' is just stupid.