This. If anything he has proved it was not a fluke.
Honestly how anyone can call Murray a one slam wonder or a fluke, assuming they are being serious and not trolling, after he has played ONE slam since he one his first is beyond me. Do they not realise that a man has NEVER won the very next slam after the won their first in the open era? It just does not happen, so for Andy to get as close as he did is very impressive and if anything suggests that there is more to come, not that it was an anomaly.
What he said.
This forum is loaded with extremely stupid people. Every time Murray loses a match someone posts some shit about his grand slam being a fluke. Hate to break it to them, but it's done - he won it and defeated a truly great player in the final in doing so (not many people defeat someone of Novak's quality in winning their first). And he's been in SIX finals now ffs.... 'fluke'..
No such thing anyway, no, not even Del Potro's... he won it, he was the last man standing, end of story.