yesterday`s nigth I was talking with a friendo who is tennis`s professor , talking about federer and his match against murray.
he saids to me that federer not works good in his training , that federer doesn`t like training , and he belives that if federer would training hard like players like ferrer , nadal or djokovic , he would be capable to still dominating them , and I remember moya saying that roger`s training sessions were and are more shorts that others players.
because that , my friend said that he is not see credits to his losts against nole and murray , because he belives that if federer really training hard , he can dominate them.
the guy is tennis professor , and said that always roger doesn`t like the training and sacrifice , and that it`s one of the pricipals reasons for lost against guys like nadal , murray or nole even pushers like simon too.
that this players demands more sacrifice and federer doesn`t like that.
anyway I don`t agree , roger maybe can training hard , but he will never has the same atlethic condition than nole and nadal , or even murray.
yeah because Federer hired Annacone and has his own personal training team just BECAUSE he doesn't train very much, right? sorry no. the reality is he's 31, he can't physically last long necessarily than his younger opponents, and as far as improvement, the reality is he's hit the point where there's not much left. I'm sure he trains a lot but it's more to keep his machinery working and up to date than like it would be for a younger player. a 20 year old guy on tour needs to train insanely, not someone like Federer who's already got all the tools just needs to stay active and in shape. if anything it would be a mistake for Roger to train TOO much, as he is older and can't handle being insanely active. too many miles on him. he does a good job of hiding the fact that his physical prowess has been decreasing, but matches like the 5 set with Murray sort of expose this