Almost every world famous althete is raising millions for cancer/starving kids/poor families/other diseases etc. That doesn't make it any less fantastic, but it doesn't excuse Lance Armstrong from criticism either (even if he was the only one), neither does 'oh everyone else doped!!!'.
Yes it does.
If we all get a +2, then it's not an advantage anymore.
Lol, if anyone is pompous that would be you, can't even grasp simple facts
As for the charity:
I keep giving simple facts and I keep hearing Lance is evil because he doped and Novak is right. C'mon seriously, grow up.
I can see clearly that you only want to see what you see.
I only want to see what I see? Everyone has their own perspective on things, it's an opinion.
I also think red is the best color in the world. Just sayin'
this post is wrong on so many levels
Oh and...you need help.Seriously.
Cool, I also can type nonsense and insults. bla bla bla.
Then you know precious little about cycling. Merckx won eleven Grand Tours - eleven is better than seven, in much the same way seven Wimbledons by a tennis player with nothing to back them up wouldn't beat Borg's eleven. Plus, Merckx has 22 wins in the biggest one-day races, the monuments (19) plus the world championships (3), compared to Armstrong's one - the WC 1993. Merckx is so much better it is no surprise there were room for several others in between, such as Coppi, Hinault, Anquetil, Bartali, Gilmondi, Kelly....
Originally Posted by LleytonMonfils
To be fair hardly if any of the $ raised went to cancer research
And a hero doesn't ruins people's lives and collect millions of dollars constantly trying to cover up a lie. Lance is no hero.
WTF!? Yes it went to his pocket and he bought conflict diamonds with the money. Good call. I'm I the only sane person in this whole damn forum?
This Fumus guy is really a lost cause
Aww...Mr.Looner. I suggest you brush up on your tennis knowledge and type less nonsense.