for the umpteenth time, talent does not equal consistency. A talented player can reach a very high level of play, but it says nothing about him/her being able to do this consistently. Anderson IS talented, and he has played very well before. Your reasoning suggests that anyone outside the top 10 isn't talented
he's talented at serving and ripping the ball apart, regardless of the landing position of the latter.
he's among the most talented serve bot bashers indeed, there are only 3-4 of them in the top 100, despite probably hundreds would like to make it as far as Anderson with nothing but a serve.
I personally prefer multyfaceted players, with more than Karlovic and Anderson.
I would watch Simon - Monfils compared to Anderson - Karlovic, to say how disgusting this kind of style is.
It's like comparing Shaq to Dwayne in terms of basketball talent. One is a giant who couldn't throw the ball in a pool from 5 meters and the other one is an actual basketball player.
Same goes for tennis and a comparison between Anderson and 97% of the top 100.