The stats prove otherwise...Lacko shows up a few times a year and the rest of his results are abysmal...Lacko could never play the match vs Ferrer at the USO that Tipsy did...Even his Hewitt match was oustanding tennis and fightback...Guess you are hating on Janko cause he trashed Hewitt in straights?
If Lacko was talented, he would get fit and work hard and use his "talent" like certain members of the Top 10
Mate, talent doesn't purely mean consistently attaining good results. Talent can also mean having a flashy game, but can't do nothing with it. Just look at Dimitrov or Gasquet. Great looking game, but they're trash when it comes to winning matches, particularly against top players. So I suppose I'll rephrase that then. What I mean't was that Lacko had a 'better looking game' than Tipsarevic - his offence is more enjoyable to watch than Tipsy's offense. Obviously Tipsarevic is by far a better player than Lacko, but talent wise, it's questionable.
And for the record, I like Tipsy and I despise Hewitt. And the fact that he creamed Spewitt, not to mention in straight sets even when that bogan had chances in the first two sets, made it even more enjoyable. In fact, that win solidifies why I like Tipsarevic.