Randomized Seeding in Tennis - MensTennisForums.com

View Poll Results: Do you like the way seeding works in tennis?
Seeding should remain the same. 16 72.73%
Seed 1 should always play 4, Seed 2 should always play 3 and so on. 6 27.27%
This poll has already been made asshole. 0 0%
Voters: 22. You may not vote on this poll

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 14 (permalink) Old 12-09-2012, 04:01 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
BedsheetRubber92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 75
                     
Randomized Seeding in Tennis

I hear people complaining all the time about how seeding in tennis works. Most of all it was during the US open when Murray ended up in Federer's semi rather than Ferrer. I like how the seeding works because otherwise we would have seen one million Federer-Murray Nadal-Djokovic Murray-Ferrer matches due to the stagnation of the rakings over the past 4 years.
BedsheetRubber92 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 14 (permalink) Old 12-09-2012, 04:04 AM
Registered User
 
GOATsol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Age: 21
Posts: 2,893
                     
Re: Randomized Seeding in Tennis

i don't understand

GOATsol is offline  
post #3 of 14 (permalink) Old 12-09-2012, 04:11 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
BedsheetRubber92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 75
                     
Re: Randomized Seeding in Tennis

Quote:
Originally Posted by GOATsol View Post
i don't understand
You know how in most sports the team with the best record always plays the team with the worst record in the playoffs? In tennis they spread out the best players, but they treat players 1-2, 3-4, 5-8, and 9-16 as the same within their group.
BedsheetRubber92 is offline  
post #4 of 14 (permalink) Old 12-09-2012, 04:20 AM
Registered User
 
GOATsol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Age: 21
Posts: 2,893
                     
Re: Randomized Seeding in Tennis

Oh I understand now. Thank you.

That is very true, and I agree with your point.

GOATsol is offline  
post #5 of 14 (permalink) Old 12-09-2012, 04:21 AM
country flag n8
 
n8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Canberra, Australia
Age: 31
Posts: 7,390
                     
Re: Randomized Seeding in Tennis

Randomisation is definitely better. Otherwise you may have players altering their results to achieve their preferred draws for Grand Slams. For example, Federer not wanting to become number one (at present), so he can avoid Rafa until the final.

lllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Quote:
Originally Posted by n8 View Post
I think Kokkinakis will be the most successful player born in the 90s.
n8 is offline  
post #6 of 14 (permalink) Old 12-09-2012, 04:31 AM
Banned!
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 218
                     
Re: Randomized Seeding in Tennis

No change. It's all good now
RafaelNadalisGod is offline  
post #7 of 14 (permalink) Old 12-09-2012, 10:09 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,090
                     
Re: Randomized Seeding in Tennis

Randomized is fine.
Soliloque is offline  
post #8 of 14 (permalink) Old 12-10-2012, 12:26 AM
Banned!
 
heya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,580
                     
Re: Randomized Seeding in Tennis

The survival of the best athletes will finally be possible with randomized seeding.
Back in 2006, the bad athletes & one dimensional servers were ranked 2-6 (Roddick, Blake, Ljubicic, Robredo).

The last 4 years, it became so much better with improved athletic players in the top 10 and most of them care about playing on clay & grass. 7 years ago,
the brats on tour scheduled mostly hardcourt events and their seeds were high because hardly anyone else was winning in grass events.
heya is offline  
post #9 of 14 (permalink) Old 12-10-2012, 12:27 AM
Registered User
 
Certinfy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,876
                     
Re: Randomized Seeding in Tennis

Just change it to 16 seeds in Grand Slams. That's good enough for me, will make the first 3 rounds A LOT more interesting!
Certinfy is offline  
post #10 of 14 (permalink) Old 12-10-2012, 12:51 AM
Registered User
 
BauerAlmeida's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Argentina
Age: 24
Posts: 5,545
                     
Re: Randomized Seeding in Tennis

I'd rather have 1vs4 and 3vs2. It's fine random for QF, R16, etc. But SF should be like that IMO. And no, it wouldn't always be the same because rankings change.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Groove View Post
Fuck you. This ain't no God damn hobby, motherfucker.
BauerAlmeida is offline  
post #11 of 14 (permalink) Old 12-10-2012, 01:27 AM
Registered User
 
emotion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Virginia
Age: 21
Posts: 50,294
                     
Re: Randomized Seeding in Tennis

I'm okay with either, though I think I'd prefer unrandomized seeding.

I totally agree with 16 seeds

Racquet smash enthusiast
emotion is offline  
post #12 of 14 (permalink) Old 12-10-2012, 04:28 AM
Registered User
 
MaxPower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Age: 32
Posts: 7,805
                     
Re: Randomized Seeding in Tennis

Yes randomization is very important and seeding even in slams should be limited to 16, not 32. That makes early rounds more interesting. Problem with 32 seeding (even more so if it was fixed) is that it also provides ranking protection. The top guys gets easiest possible route. Is that good? NO because it becomes almost impossible to overtake them in the rankings.

Some say the top4 is the only thing that hasnt changed. But how much did the top8 change the past 3 years or so? Ferrer isn't going anywhere and hasn't in a long time. Soderling was ahead of Ferrer and just as locked into his top position before he went down to mono. Berdych has been in the top8 for what? 3 years in a row now? Del Potro would just like Soderling definitely been locked into top8 if he hadn't gotten an injury.

top8 has been almost as safe as top4. It's not a coincidence that 9-10 has seen more changes. Mostly because of how the seeding system works where actually entire top8 gets bye in R1 in many tournaments and cakewalk until QF in most slams. Only way to ever displace someone in top8 would be to do one of those magical runs like for example Soderling achieved in RG 2009 where he had to beat a nr1 in R3 but also backed it up and somehow made final as a 20is seed.

It's VERY HARD to fight your way into top8 due to the seeding advantage they hold in all the M1000 and slams and reaching QF in most of them (like for example Berdych) if enough to keep everyone else behind unless they do magical runs and gain big paydays like winning a M1000 or reaching a slam final.
MaxPower is offline  
post #13 of 14 (permalink) Old 12-10-2012, 06:16 AM
country flag HKz
Hakeem
 
HKz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mesa
Posts: 5,234
                     
Re: Randomized Seeding in Tennis

Quote:
Originally Posted by heya View Post
The survival of the best athletes will finally be possible with randomized seeding.
Back in 2006, the bad athletes & one dimensional servers were ranked 2-6 (Roddick, Blake, Ljubicic, Robredo).

The last 4 years, it became so much better with improved athletic players in the top 10 and most of them care about playing on clay & grass. 7 years ago,
the brats on tour scheduled mostly hardcourt events and their seeds were high because hardly anyone else was winning in grass events.
Wat

Federer / Haas / Safin / Gaudio / Kuerten / Youzhny / Nadal / Gonzalez / Ljubicic / Hewitt / Soderling / Wawrinka / Coria / Nalbandian / Kohlschreiber
HKz is offline  
post #14 of 14 (permalink) Old 12-10-2012, 01:47 PM
Registered User
 
Trollicki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,616
                     
Re: Randomized Seeding in Tennis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Certinfy View Post
Just change it to 16 seeds in Grand Slams. That's good enough for me, will make the first 3 rounds A LOT more interesting!
I pretty much agree, this would probably go a long way in making the Slams more suspenseful.
Trollicki is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome