Why Are All The Flukes At The AO? - Page 3 - MensTennisForums.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #31 of 63 (permalink) Old 11-15-2012, 02:45 AM
Registered User
 
james82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Age: 34
Posts: 1,025
                     
Re: Why Are All The Flukes At The AO?

lol @ people blaming a one month offseason on players not doing so good at the aus open
though the heat a different story :P it can get hot in melbourne in january and most of the players dont come here early enough to get used to the conditions

faves-Ito,Paire,Kei,Bedene,Jung,A.Gonzalez,Fabbiano,Uchi yama,Sock,Cecchinato,Basilashvili,Kranjinovic,Dzum hur,Kudla,Schwartzman,Duckworth,Harrison,Fucsovics ,Marti,Mitchell,Laaksonen,Degreef,Krawietz,Arguell o,Olivo,Clezar,Pella,Bagnis,Copil,Goffin,Delbonis, Pospsil,Janowicz,Berankis,Lajovic,Donskoy,Struff,R ola,Langer,Zhang,Moriya,Eysseric,Nguyen,Evans,Gian nessi,Wu,Belotti,Trav,yang,busta,kuznetsov,Herbert ,ehara,sekiguchi,Andreozzi,Pouille,Coppejans,Pavla sek,Djere,Kristin,Chung,Garin,Ymer,Donaldson,Jarry ,Donati,Edmund,Kyrgios,Nishioka,Taro,Lama,Novak,Bo ltz,Lee,Paul,Zverev,Rublev,Safiullin,Santillan

others:Ruffin,Stebe,Jeong

my youtube https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWy...crHBo8TLJLJa2w
james82 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #32 of 63 (permalink) Old 11-15-2012, 02:46 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Freak3yman84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 12,445
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by GOATsol View Post
No I wasn't.
Yes you was maan.

Oh Sheesh Y'all, 'Twas A Dream

Number of Times I've Cried Over Sucking at FITD: All but seven

W Houston and Samarkand Singles W Charlottesville W Lermontov W ATP Bastad W Bol Fut W Orleans (w/MathMul) W Cordenons (w/dinkulpus) Tashkent S&D (w/ Mr Brightside)

Quote:
Originally Posted by @Sweet Cleopatra View Post
I like how you make me appreciate my life by comparing it to yours then I take a deep breath and say: Thank God..
Freak3yman84 is offline  
post #33 of 63 (permalink) Old 11-15-2012, 02:55 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Age: 34
Posts: 1,511
                     
Re: Why Are All The Flukes At The AO?

Don't forget Mugdasco, almost finalist in 2009.

RG had a lot of flukes when its surface was slow clay and there were underdogs such as Costa,Verkerk,Galo Blanco,Meligeni... who were capable of demolishing top ten players
spanish_army is offline  
post #34 of 63 (permalink) Old 11-15-2012, 03:07 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,955
                     
Re: Why Are All The Flukes At The AO?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freak3yman84 View Post
Because you hate me maan.
She is a woman already
Julián Santiago is offline  
post #35 of 63 (permalink) Old 11-15-2012, 03:09 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Freak3yman84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 12,445
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julián Santiago View Post
She is a woman already
Maan that's e revelant!

Oh Sheesh Y'all, 'Twas A Dream

Number of Times I've Cried Over Sucking at FITD: All but seven

W Houston and Samarkand Singles W Charlottesville W Lermontov W ATP Bastad W Bol Fut W Orleans (w/MathMul) W Cordenons (w/dinkulpus) Tashkent S&D (w/ Mr Brightside)

Quote:
Originally Posted by @Sweet Cleopatra View Post
I like how you make me appreciate my life by comparing it to yours then I take a deep breath and say: Thank God..
Freak3yman84 is offline  
post #36 of 63 (permalink) Old 11-15-2012, 04:45 AM
country flag Kip
Registered User
 
Kip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,585
                     
Re: Why Are All The Flukes At The AO?

First, let me say how I despise the use of "mug" on MTF! So many faceless no names daring to criticize others doing things they could not even attempt in their dreams.

As to the question, I simply believe these men have an inspired two weeks, rise in recognition, and then falter under the new found weight of expectation. It's more mental than anything else.
Kip is offline  
post #37 of 63 (permalink) Old 11-15-2012, 05:12 AM
Moderator
 
Pratik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 18,029
                     
Re: Why Are All The Flukes At The AO?

All flukes at AO?
you forget your countryman MaliVai
Pratik is offline  
post #38 of 63 (permalink) Old 11-15-2012, 08:05 AM
ALT-0
 
Litotes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Norway
Age: 43
Posts: 56,884
                     
Re: Why Are All The Flukes At The AO?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freak3yman84 View Post
Schuetmug, Mugzalez, Clemug, Tsongmug, Mugdull, Mugdhatis, etc.

I'm starting to think it's fixed. Discuss.
You do realize "Mug" stands for "Mentally Unchallenged Giant"? I agree these players deserve praise, but this it a little over the top.
Litotes is offline  
post #39 of 63 (permalink) Old 11-15-2012, 08:16 AM
Registered User
 
Chris Kuerten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Age: 26
Posts: 18,049
                     
Re: Why Are All The Flukes At The AO?

Great thread.

I suggest to lock it and ban the OP.

I am the Nelson Mandela of MTF

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shinoj View Post
Santaro was a better version of Ferrer
Quote:
At the end of Federer's first round match at the Australian Open a fawning interviewer asked about his kids and if he had bought coach Stefan Edberg a birthday present - no, by the way, the privilege of knocking up with 'King Roger' was enough of a present apparently.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post...nnis/65231157/

Sombrerero loco exposed

(Again)
Chris Kuerten is offline  
post #40 of 63 (permalink) Old 11-15-2012, 08:31 AM
Slacker
 
Time Violation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mount Sharp
Age: 37
Posts: 15,519
                     
Re: Why Are All The Flukes At The AO?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gustavo Kuerten View Post
Great thread.

I suggest to lock it and ban the OP.
Spot on

“There’s so many athletes, tennis players around the world,” he continued, trying to put his life into some kind of perspective, “they want to be the best in what they do. They want to succeed. Many of them, they don’t succeed in the end. I’m fortunate to have this opportunity and succeed.”
Time Violation is offline  
post #41 of 63 (permalink) Old 11-15-2012, 08:48 AM
Registered User
 
Burrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,299
                     
Re: Why Are All The Flukes At The AO?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chase Visa View Post
It was at the start of the season where several players aren't match-fit yet and before Novak/Muzza were that good and when Rafa was still inconsistent off clay.
Or these players were simply playing excellent tennis in their own right.

These runs by unexpected players are amongst my fonder memories in the sport. They acquired something which today's underdogs could only dream of. Balls, obviously.

People have bitter memories of Clement reaching the final, because seemingly almost everyone wanted and expected Grosjean to do so, but it doesn't take away from the fact that he strolled past a young Federer, beat former champion Kafelnikov and edged out Grosjean himself in an extremely close match, playing creative tennis and daring to approach the net, especially for a smaller man.

Schuettler was a rock, if not fortunate of the withdrawal of Safin and the fact Roddick was playing at 75% due to his marathon against El Aynaoui. He played fearless tennis up until the final where the wheels fell off.

Baghdatis played magical tennis. There was just a sense of inevitability that he would reach the final and if it weren't for his legs, I think Federer would have had to have played one of the most clutch matches of his career to win.

Gonzalez and Tsonga hit the form of their careers. Both served well and dominated from the baseline, with Tsonga's drop volley's never better.

People can say that it was because Nadal, Djokovic and Murray hadn't yet reached their prime, without judging the performances on their own merit, because either they can't remember them nor care to see them but every one of these players played a level of tennis worthy of a grand slam finalist.

The answer to your question is that nobody exactly knows why, each of these men probably have different reasons. What they all have in common is that they were physically and mentally prepared. Without the grind and troubles of the tour, I'd imagine that these players physical and mental bruises would have healed and that they come back onto the tour feeling refreshed and looking forward to the first big one of the year. There's no doubt that these players proved mentally stronger during that fortnight than any in their career so I'd be more inclined to go with the inkling that their mentally approach had been resynthesized.
Burrow is offline  
post #42 of 63 (permalink) Old 11-15-2012, 08:57 AM
Registered User
 
Han Solo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Age: 39
Posts: 2,346
                     
Re: Why Are All The Flukes At The AO?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Burrow View Post
Or these players were simply playing excellent tennis in their own right.

These runs by unexpected players are amongst my fonder memories in the sport. They acquired something which today's underdogs could only dream of. Balls, obviously.

People have bitter memories of Clement reaching the final, because seemingly almost everyone wanted and expected Grosjean to do so, but it doesn't take away from the fact that he strolled past a young Federer, beat former champion Kafelnikov and edged out Grosjean himself in an extremely close match, playing creative tennis and daring to approach the net, especially for a smaller man.

Schuettler was a rock, if not fortunate of the withdrawal of Safin and the fact Roddick was playing at 75% due to his marathon against El Aynaoui. He played fearless tennis up until the final where the wheels fell off.

Baghdatis played magical tennis. There was just a sense of inevitability that he would reach the final and if it weren't for his legs, I think Federer would have had to have played one of the most clutch matches of his career to win.

Gonzalez and Tsonga hit the form of their careers. Both served well and dominated from the baseline, with Tsonga's drop volley's never better.

People can say that it was because Nadal, Djokovic and Murray hadn't yet reached their prime, without judging the performances on their own merit, because either they can't remember them nor care to see them but every one of these players played a level of tennis worthy of a grand slam finalist.

The answer to your question is that nobody exactly knows why, each of these men probably have different reasons. What they all have in common is that they were physically and mentally prepared. Without the grind and troubles of the tour, I'd imagine that these players physical and mental bruises would have healed and that they come back onto the tour feeling refreshed and looking forward to the first big one of the year. There's no doubt that these players proved mentally stronger during that fortnight than any in their career so I'd be more inclined to go with the inkling that their mentally approach had been resynthesized.
Agreed. Of course Nadal, Djokovic, and Murray are excellent players, but the fact other players made major finals before these guys hit their peak does not detract from those performances.

I particularly enjoyed Baghdatis's surprise run at AO. And he played amazing tennis that fortnight. He was rather unfortunate to meet Federer - who was pretty much unbeatable that year off clay...
Han Solo is offline  
post #43 of 63 (permalink) Old 11-15-2012, 09:47 AM
Registered User
 
Burrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,299
                     
Re: Why Are All The Flukes At The AO?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Han Solo View Post
Agreed. Of course Nadal, Djokovic, and Murray are excellent players, but the fact other players made major finals before these guys hit their peak does not detract from those performances.

I particularly enjoyed Baghdatis's surprise run at AO. And he played amazing tennis that fortnight. He was rather unfortunate to meet Federer - who was pretty much unbeatable that year off clay...
Baghdatis had an enormous chance against Federer. A set, 2-0 and a break point for a double break. Federer wasn't as convincing with his performances in Australia as he was in 2004, 2005 (Yes, he lost to Safin in the SF, but the 2005 AO version of Federer trumps the 2006 version) and 2007. He was pushed to the limits by Davydenko and Haas and looked to be more of the same from Kiefer and Baghdatis but both didn't have enough left in the tank. Big opportunities missed by all of these men.
Burrow is offline  
post #44 of 63 (permalink) Old 11-15-2012, 10:57 AM
Registered User
 
August's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Age: 26
Posts: 5,471
                     
Re: Why Are All The Flukes At The AO?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lestat View Post
Indeed, Gonzalez beind runner up in a GS is a real disgrace for tennis
Yep, Gonzo shoulda been a GS champ.

Stan Wawrinka
2014 Australian Open Champion | 2014 Monte Carlo Masters Champion | 2015 French Open Champion

Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
2008 Paris Masters Champion | 2014 Toronto Masters Champion

My Twitter
August is offline  
post #45 of 63 (permalink) Old 11-15-2012, 11:57 PM
.
 
rocketassist's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 29,027
                     
Re: Why Are All The Flukes At The AO?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Burrow View Post
Or these players were simply playing excellent tennis in their own right.

These runs by unexpected players are amongst my fonder memories in the sport. They acquired something which today's underdogs could only dream of. Balls, obviously.

People have bitter memories of Clement reaching the final, because seemingly almost everyone wanted and expected Grosjean to do so, but it doesn't take away from the fact that he strolled past a young Federer, beat former champion Kafelnikov and edged out Grosjean himself in an extremely close match, playing creative tennis and daring to approach the net, especially for a smaller man.

Schuettler was a rock, if not fortunate of the withdrawal of Safin and the fact Roddick was playing at 75% due to his marathon against El Aynaoui. He played fearless tennis up until the final where the wheels fell off.

Baghdatis played magical tennis. There was just a sense of inevitability that he would reach the final and if it weren't for his legs, I think Federer would have had to have played one of the most clutch matches of his career to win.

Gonzalez and Tsonga hit the form of their careers. Both served well and dominated from the baseline, with Tsonga's drop volley's never better.

People can say that it was because Nadal, Djokovic and Murray hadn't yet reached their prime, without judging the performances on their own merit, because either they can't remember them nor care to see them but every one of these players played a level of tennis worthy of a grand slam finalist.

The answer to your question is that nobody exactly knows why, each of these men probably have different reasons. What they all have in common is that they were physically and mentally prepared. Without the grind and troubles of the tour, I'd imagine that these players physical and mental bruises would have healed and that they come back onto the tour feeling refreshed and looking forward to the first big one of the year. There's no doubt that these players proved mentally stronger during that fortnight than any in their career so I'd be more inclined to go with the inkling that their mentally approach had been resynthesized.
One of the best posts I've seen on this forum in donkey's. Well said

unbiased analyst extraordinaire
rocketassist is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome