At least it's better than Fedal which is an overrated rivalry thanks to the media.
I mean it's just a bad match-up for Fed. I don't see what is so great about their rivalry to be honest. True that they had some great matches but still the H2H looks way one-sided. I don't consider that a great rivalry.
At least Djokovic and Nadal can beat each other on any surface and that's what makes their rivalry exiciting to watch imo. Also they are at the same age and that's an important point to mention.
The great rivalries at the moment imo are:
federer and nadal can beat each other too , federer was capable to defeated nadal in clay and in many times he forced nadal to the limits like in rome 2006 and more other matches , nadal was capable too to defeated federer in other courts.
both the age was an important factor too and nadal`s style of game in the perfect weapon against federer`s tennis too.
this rivalry was one-sided because the many matches over clay , if the matches would be in more different courts ( the harcourts of that period were more fasters not this very slow harcourts , more matches in grass ,indoor , etc...) maybe the things would be differents , but the many victorys of nadal in clay over fed gifted nadal all the confidence