Because defending isn't tennis according to MTF. Ridiculous thought, mostly said by Fedtards/Nadal haters obviously.
Pushing like Murray though...
Nadal's tennis is awful, don't even compare it to ballbashers. At least they're actually somewhat entertaining to watch.
Murray isn't a pusher, how many times do I have to say that?
it's because Murry your lucky one slam wonder (who should gratefully thank to Nole for donating that slam btw) will never be as good or popular as Djokovic, so you'll keep crying and boring us to death with your silly posts and silly threads, lol. oops, did I just say this? so proud of myself.
Are you actually going to answer the question properly? I guess not, never mind.
I couldn't care less if Djokovic is more popular. Andy's more talented and is better to watch, that's enough for me. Also, he's beaten Djokovic the last two times they've played
Proud of what exactly? Telling me something that I've heard countless times on here? Bravo
You mean why are ballbashers regarded more highly than pushers? Not saying Murray is a pusher or anything but he does do an awful amount of retrieving. Personally I prefer the all rounder like the GOAT who can do both offense and defense equally well. Nadull is the worst breed. Just full on defensive pushing. Murray is much less of a pusher than Nadull anyway.
Nadal isn't a pusher. He's a spinblitzer/moonballer. It's far worse than being a pusher.
Andy isn't a pusher. He's a tactical all rounder, so to say. He has tactics, uses power, uses defense, uses slice, has a great first serve, thinks on court and can adapt to certain players rather well after working them around the court. He's the most talented player behind Roger. That is far better than mindlessly hitting the ball as hard as possible.
Of course Roger's tennis tops all.