I'm talking about Del Potro. Nalbandian's game is actually good, even if Nalbandian himself is a complete failure, a clown, a headcase and overrated.
ah but what are we talking about here? About what style is more highly regarded, not whether some player is a a headcase. Stay in topic.
Nalbandian, who doesn't have a mayor weapon except his solid BH and tactical gameplay is more highly regarded than simple ballbashing, that's for sure. We can agree there.
But don't put Murray in the same bag. His style is not that of a tactician, if anything he's a defensive pusher, and rarely a defensive counterpuncher.
Anyway, you don't listen, so why do you make a thread asking a question, you get the answer and you refuse to listen and take it in.
Like a child.