Attack>defence in terms of entertainment factor and marketability as well as crowd support. Therefore, ball bashers>mug pushers.
Entertainment? There is nothing entertaining about watching a player try and hit the ball as hard as possibly over and over again, unless you get some sort of enjoyment out of watching balls getting bashed of course.
Mandy tactician?LOL......worst pusher in top 50......disgusting player
I have a more relevant question: if the OP really believes in what he is writing here about smart tennis being entertaining, why does he hate Simon and call him a pusher when he has a game similar to Murray's?
Simug's tennis is not the same as Andy's. It's inferior. Andy uses tactics to work his opponents around. He uses power, defense, volleys, slice, different shots and good tactical tennis. Simug is the epitome of a pusher. Andy is not.
ball bashers are the backbone of tennis
No, they are not.
Because he is disgusting pushing ugly looking swearing brat.
As opposed to a certain faking, cheating classless Serbian/Spaniard, right?
Andy isn't a pusher.
His looks don't have anything to do with his tennis.
Get a clue.
The better question is why are mindless pushers being branded as 'tacticians' these days
Andy isn't a mindless pusher and neither is Ferrer. Get that into your head.
There's hardly anything tactical about a gameplan based on retrieving as many balls as possible especially in this slow court era.
Andy is all tactics. Of course he does sometimes just wait for errors but more often than not, he uses tactics, slice, different shots and smart tennis.
Ballbashers are more interesting to watch.
They really aren't. The only "ballbasher" that's interesting to watch is Soderling and that's because he can actually do other things apart from hit the ball hard.
because murray waits for the UE's... happy?
and i still cant believe murray's luck this summer. murray uso champ? LOL
You must be bitter than Andy is now officially better than Del Potro.
And they are boring to watch.
As opposed to players who hit the ball the same way over and over again as hard as possible?
Mandy a tactician
more like a weaponless pushing clown.
Wrong, as usual.
Not even Murray himself believes he won a slam, judging by how he acted in Tokyo.
Remember when Djokovic lost to Kevin Anderson shortly after winning the Australian Open?
Crapeod starting a thread
No one. I just found it hilarious, and I felt that my opinion would be valued among real tennis fans. Problem?
Sapeod isn't even a tennis fan
just a clueless fangirl whose career goal is to be Mandy's personal maid.
Yet again, wrong. I am 100% a tennis fan. I know what's best for tennis and what's bad for it.
You know damn well why this is Sapeod, so don't play naive. Murray's game style is so boring sometimes that I find my self looking in the crowd for someone picking his nose just to justify watching the game (it's worse with Nadal BTW).
Incorrect. Andy's tennis is 100 times better than Nadal/Djokovic's. Along with superior talent, he can just do far more than they can and it shows. His variety shits on theirs.
Delpo's matches in comparison are a party to the eyes.
Pretty? I've heard a lot of words that descrive his tennis and that's probably the most idiotic. Pretty? There is nothing pretty about a 6'6" clown who can't move on the court bashing the ball the same way every single point.
People like watching Delpo much more and people tend to go with what they like.
Their problem then if they prefer that sort of tennis.
"Nadal the greatest forehand in tennis"
It's a complete joke that people are still saying that. Utter nonsense.