it's because Murry your lucky one slam wonder (who should gratefully thank to Nole for donating that slam btw) will never be as good or popular as Djokovic, so you'll keep crying and boring us to death with your silly posts and silly threads, lol. oops, did I just say this? so proud of myself.
Wow someone is really bitter. It is pretty funny, I'm not really a huge fan of Murray, but the amount of stupidity and lack of regard on this forum is insane sometimes. Seriously, all those that said Murray wouldn't pick up a slam, have made so many asinine excuses and now they are on the "Murray will be a one-slam wonder" train. What is next after that? Murray will only be a two-slam wonder? I mean it is only fucking logical a player like him who has consistently been knocking on the door, regardless of how "bad" of a player he may be in comparison
to Federer, Nadal and Djokovic, should most likely pick up more titles. I mean it isn't like people are waiting for someone like Ferrer to pick up a GS, this guy Murray makes consistent slam SFs and finals..
Regardless, variety is always good to have on a tour. We need the ballbashers, the counter-punchers, the defensive baseliners, the all-round players, the big servers, etc. You may dislike them, but fact is you need all those types just like any sport needs the variety of personalities on tour as well. It adds extra drama and excitement. Murray's style can be frustrating to watch, as he is certainly capable of playing good offensive tennis, especially by coming to the net, however, again, his tactics clearly work for him, boring or not.