More important for one's GOAT resume: Slams or Time Spent at #1? - Page 3 - MensTennisForums.com
View Poll Results: More important?
Slams 44 88.00%
Weeks at #1 6 12.00%
Voters: 50. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #31 of 69 (permalink) Old 10-06-2012, 07:59 AM
Registered User
 
Transcender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 14,547
                     
Re: More important for one's GOAT resume: Slams or Time Spent at #1?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Lenders View Post
Slams.

Rankings are mostly a joke.
More like that comment is mostly a joke.

TT stats site: tt-statistics.info
Transcender is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #32 of 69 (permalink) Old 10-06-2012, 09:03 AM
Registered User
 
Andi-M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sheffield
Age: 29
Posts: 5,998
                     
Re: More important for one's GOAT resume: Slams or Time Spent at #1?

At this moment in time its the no1 ranking that is harder to obtain. Delpo won a slam he's no where near no 1 and guys like Berdych, Tsonga, Soderling have been far closer to winning a slam than getting anywhere near no1.

Go Andy!

So very very proud to be a fan of Mr Andy Murray Wimbledon Champion 2013

Double Grand slam champion. Olympic Gold Medalist. Holder of 9 Masters 1000 events # legend
Andi-M is offline  
post #33 of 69 (permalink) Old 10-06-2012, 02:29 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,339
                     
Re: More important for one's GOAT resume: Slams or Time Spent at #1?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Lenders View Post
In order to win a Slam, you have to win seven best of five matches against the best players in the world, you can't BS your way.
You confused slams with WTF/TMC.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Lenders View Post
Actually it's far easier to fluke a #1 ranking than a Slam.
Who were fluke #1 in the open era?
atennisfan is offline  
post #34 of 69 (permalink) Old 10-06-2012, 03:31 PM
ALT-0
 
Litotes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Norway
Age: 43
Posts: 51,792
                     
Re: More important for one's GOAT resume: Slams or Time Spent at #1?

Quote:
Originally Posted by atennisfan View Post
Who were fluke #1 in the open era?
I'd like to know that too. I see no flukes on the list of #1s that Slasher conveniently displays in his sig.
Litotes is offline  
post #35 of 69 (permalink) Old 10-06-2012, 03:32 PM
Registered User
 
Freak3yman84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 12,417
                     
Re: More important for one's GOAT resume: Slams or Time Spent at #1?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Litotes View Post
I'd like to know that too. I see no flukes on the list of #1s that Slasher conveniently displays in his sig.
And it was said that you cannot fluke slams

Oh Sheesh Y'all, 'Twas A Dream

Number of Times I've Cried Over Sucking at FITD: All but seven

W Houston and Samarkand Singles W Charlottesville W Lermontov W ATP Bastad W Bol Fut W Orleans (w/MathMul) W Cordenons (w/dinkulpus) Tashkent S&D (w/ Mr Brightside)

Quote:
Originally Posted by @Sweet Cleopatra View Post
I like how you make me appreciate my life by comparing it to yours then I take a deep breath and say: Thank God..
Freak3yman84 is offline  
post #36 of 69 (permalink) Old 10-06-2012, 03:44 PM
Registered User
 
Looner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 13,127
                     
Re: More important for one's GOAT resume: Slams or Time Spent at #1?

Slams.


The "Who plays tennis?" thread


Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocket Rod Laver
Roger is like a good red wine, he’s getting better with age.
Looner is offline  
post #37 of 69 (permalink) Old 10-06-2012, 03:48 PM
Registered User
 
GSMnadal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Netherlands
Age: 23
Posts: 16,533
                     
Re: More important for one's GOAT resume: Slams or Time Spent at #1?

Slams and level of the competition

RAFAEL NADAL

'Rafael Nadal is the best ever' - John McEnroe

1 AO - 9 RG - 2 W - 2 USO
GSMnadal is offline  
post #38 of 69 (permalink) Old 10-06-2012, 03:54 PM
Registered User
 
BroTree123's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 17,731
                     
Re: More important for one's GOAT resume: Slams or Time Spent at #1?

Slams and a surname that contains the letters, N, A, D, A and L.

Quote:
Hian about himself
Quote:
No words can describe me.
Without me, it would be just aweso.
No shit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTwEeZi View Post
Never held a racquet in my life.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTwEeZi View Post
I've played the game for close to 10 years. This should come as no surprise to many.

Banned Users
BroTree123 is offline  
post #39 of 69 (permalink) Old 10-06-2012, 03:56 PM
Registered User
 
Matt01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,763
                     
Re: More important for one's GOAT resume: Slams or Time Spent at #1?

Slams > weeks as #1.

When equal number of Slam wins -> weeks as #1 is a tiebreaker.

Monaco - Del Potro - Nadal - Wawrinka - Robredo - Simon - Berdych - Djokovic - Chardy


Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Kuerten View Post
Djokovic is the people's champion, Federer and Nadal are greedy thugs.
Matt01 is online now  
post #40 of 69 (permalink) Old 10-06-2012, 05:09 PM
Registered User
 
saviopr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 270
                     
Re: More important for one's GOAT resume: Slams or Time Spent at #1?

Slams. Ask for any player and he will answer this.
saviopr is offline  
post #41 of 69 (permalink) Old 10-06-2012, 07:00 PM
Registered User
 
manadrainer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Age: 32
Posts: 2,212
                     
Re: More important for one's GOAT resume: Slams or Time Spent at #1?

I think it's harder to get the #1 ranking. You can't fluke the #1 ranking, unless you ask a Nadal/Djoko tard about Fed reclaiming it at 31 y.o.

There are many players who have won slams without being #1, while the reverse I think it's true only for Rios.

8th day of July 2012: 7-time Wimbledon champion!

Once upon a time there was a myth about strong and weak eras. On this glorious day the clownery was eventually unmasked: 30 y.o. past-prime daddy Fed became #1 once again in the supposed strong "Spartan" era with his rivals at their peak.
And they all lived happily ever after.
Long live King Federer!


17 Grand Slam titles
7 Wimbledon titles
302 weeks at #1
Legend
manadrainer is offline  
post #42 of 69 (permalink) Old 10-06-2012, 07:58 PM
Registered User
 
Alex999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kanata
Posts: 11,454
                     
Re: More important for one's GOAT resume: Slams or Time Spent at #1?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Litotes View Post
I'd like to know that too. I see no flukes on the list of #1s that Slasher conveniently displays in his sig.
Rios was #1 without winning a major. So, he was a fluke in my opinion. Rios managed to reach one GS final (AO) and a few QF. very poor performance at majors.
Alex999 is offline  
post #43 of 69 (permalink) Old 10-06-2012, 08:04 PM
Registered User
 
Freak3yman84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 12,417
                     
Re: More important for one's GOAT resume: Slams or Time Spent at #1?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex999 View Post
Rios was #1 without winning a major. So, he was a fluke in my opinion. Rios managed to reach one GS final (AO) and a few QF. very poor performance at majors.
So 1... There are a bunch of fluke slam winners

Oh Sheesh Y'all, 'Twas A Dream

Number of Times I've Cried Over Sucking at FITD: All but seven

W Houston and Samarkand Singles W Charlottesville W Lermontov W ATP Bastad W Bol Fut W Orleans (w/MathMul) W Cordenons (w/dinkulpus) Tashkent S&D (w/ Mr Brightside)

Quote:
Originally Posted by @Sweet Cleopatra View Post
I like how you make me appreciate my life by comparing it to yours then I take a deep breath and say: Thank God..
Freak3yman84 is offline  
post #44 of 69 (permalink) Old 10-06-2012, 08:09 PM
Registered User
 
Alex999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kanata
Posts: 11,454
                     
Re: More important for one's GOAT resume: Slams or Time Spent at #1?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freak3yman84 View Post
So 1... There are a bunch of fluke slam winners
well you can look at it that way, if you wish. Rios is just an anomaly when it comes to #1 w/o slams plus he has an extremely poor performance at majors. just my 5 cents.
Alex999 is offline  
post #45 of 69 (permalink) Old 10-06-2012, 08:13 PM
Rankings Master
 
Slasher1985's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Age: 30
Posts: 11,338
                     
Re: More important for one's GOAT resume: Slams or Time Spent at #1?

Rios stayed into the rankings 5 weeks longer than Rafter without winning any major.

IMO there is no such thing as a fluke. Rios had a very consistent 1998, during a Sampras Era. No majors won indeed, but there are 3 Masters and the Grand Slam Cup. He was number 1 twice during that year. There are many factors to why this could have happened. Points balance, adversaries and especially game consistency are amongst them.

Regarding the OQ, I say that both are the dream of every tennis player out there. When Rios became number 1, nobody in Chile cared about any GS and took to the streets. When Na Li won the French Open, all China partied. When Murray won the US Open this whole forum was talking about it. One without the other seems to be incomplete, as people here mention Rios as a fluke. Chang never got to number 1 despite winning a Grand Slam and not so many people care about him anymore.

Who would you say was better: Chang with 1 Slam or Rafter with 1 week as No.1 ? Answer this question and the OQ is also answered.

EDIT: Also to add, cause I forgot.
Winning one Grand Slam = Top form for a shorter time period.
Getting to number 1 = Consistent form for a longer time period.
Slasher1985 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome