Originally Posted by fluffyyelloballz
Roger may be a better player in the overall history of the sport stats-wise, may have the 'better' game stylistically with his all-court game, may even be the GOAT but head to head versus Nadal, Nadal is better.
On the day, when these two have played in Major tournaments, eight times Nadal has won the last point. Eight times, eighty percent of the time on the game's biggest stages, Rafael nadal beats Roger Federer and so that makes Nadal the better player of the two.
That computes to me no problem.
Except that just about more than half of those 8 times, they played on clay?