Endless Era Debates - Page 3 - MensTennisForums.com
View Poll Results: This is a:
Subpar era 32 18.39%
Par era 32 18.39%
Strong era 110 63.22%
Voters: 174. You may not vote on this poll

 387Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #31 of 3984 (permalink) Old 08-26-2012, 02:27 AM
Registered User
 
ssj100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 662
                     
Re: Do you think this era will be remembered as a subpar era?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smoke944 View Post
Nadal won slams off of clay, so yes, very subpar era.
True. Also, Murray is the no. 3 seed and he's never won a slam. Ferrer the no. 4 seed, and he's never won a slam. 31 year old as the no. 1 seed. Isner as no. 10 seed? Joker as no. 2 seed, and he's never won the French. Weak era indeed. Man, why don't we just say they all suck actually. Hang on...

warm regards...

6-2, 6-3, 6-2 and 6-2, 6-2, 6-2 and 6-3, 6-0 (and not even finals).
ssj100 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #32 of 3984 (permalink) Old 08-26-2012, 02:28 AM
Registered User
 
Mark Lenders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 17,675
                     
Re: Do you think this era will be remembered as a subpar era?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ssj100 View Post
True. Also, Murray is the no. 3 seed and he's never won a slam. Ferrer the no. 4 seed, and he's never won a slam. 31 year old as the no. 1 seed. Man, why don't we just say they all suck.
Using this logic, it's a very strong era where even unseeded players like Hewitt have 2 Slams and 80 weeks as world #1, not to mention Roddick too.
Mark Lenders is offline  
post #33 of 3984 (permalink) Old 08-26-2012, 02:30 AM
Registered User
 
ssj100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 662
                     
Re: Do you think this era will be remembered as a subpar era?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Lenders View Post
Using this logic, it's a very strong era where even unseeded players like Hewitt have 2 Slams and 80 weeks as world #1, not to mention Roddick too.
Just trying to make the point that there is no such thing as a "weak" era. If anything is true, it's that the skill and fitness of tennis players are getting stronger on average with each year. This means eras are actually getting "stronger" and "stronger".

warm regards...

6-2, 6-3, 6-2 and 6-2, 6-2, 6-2 and 6-3, 6-0 (and not even finals).
ssj100 is offline  
 
post #34 of 3984 (permalink) Old 08-26-2012, 02:32 AM
Banned!
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sen'jin Village
Age: 33
Posts: 18,509
                     
Re: Do you think this era will be remembered as a subpar era?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Lenders View Post
Krajicek and Ivanisevic are far more talented player than Ferrer. Their serves alone are worth more than Ferrer's entire 'game'. They won Slams because they had the weapons to beat the best players of their era in the super fast grass of Wimbledon, it's far from an atrocity.
You are allowing your bias get better of you, as usual. By no means does a serve bot deserve a slam. I have watched plenty of Ivanisievic matches. His ground game made my eyes bleed, he was basically a worse version of Isner of that era. Serving on a fast surface and doing not much else and capturing the biggest title in the sport is somehow fine. While a guy who worked hard all his life, has solid consistency, decent ground game - but never made a slam final or won masters because he admittedly lacks weapons is now an atrocity?

Just because you can serve players off court does not make you good, skilled or deserving. Players like Goran and Krajicek would never approach a title beyond 250 today.
Topspindoctor is offline  
post #35 of 3984 (permalink) Old 08-26-2012, 02:33 AM
Registered User
 
Mark Lenders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 17,675
                     
Re: Do you think this era will be remembered as a subpar era?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ssj100 View Post
Just trying to make the point that there is no such thing as a "weak" era. If anything is true, it's that the skill and fitness of tennis players are getting stronger on average with each year. This means eras are actually getting "stronger" and "stronger".
The new era seems to be weak though. Only two players under 25 years old have even made a Slam semifinal: Del Potro and Cilic. No other U-25 has been even particularly close to reach a semifinal so far.

This does not speak volumes of the strength of the new generation of players.
Mark Lenders is offline  
post #36 of 3984 (permalink) Old 08-26-2012, 02:34 AM
The Fearless Leadah
 
redshift36188's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Age: 31
Posts: 10,091
                     
Re: Do you think this era will be remembered as a subpar era?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Lenders View Post
But everyone knows that's not the case, he's not even among the 10 best players. His seed is a result of abusing the flawed ranking system to no end, like Boredo once did to get his high seedings. There are bound to be mugs getting top 5 seeds in any era, strong or weak, as long as the current ranking system isn't changed to prevent this kind of abuse, it says nothing about the strength of the era.
The system is not flawed. No one breaks the 5000 points barrier without being good. Ferrer is without a doubt among the 10 best players in the world.
redshift36188 is offline  
post #37 of 3984 (permalink) Old 08-26-2012, 02:38 AM
Registered User
 
Mark Lenders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 17,675
                     
Re: Do you think this era will be remembered as a subpar era?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Topspindoctor View Post
You are allowing your bias get better of you, as usual. By no means does a serve bot deserve a slam. I have watched plenty of Ivanisievic matches. His ground game made my eyes bleed, he was basically a worse version of Isner of that era. Serving on a fast surface and doing not much else and capturing the biggest title in the sport is somehow fine. While a guy who worked hard all his life, has solid consistency, decent ground game - but never made a slam final or won masters because he admittedly lacks weapons is now an atrocity?

Just because you can serve players off court does not make you good, skilled or deserving. Players like Goran and Krajicek would never approach a title beyond 250 today.
They'd definitely have a good shot to win a Slam if there was a surface like the lightning fast grass of the 90s. Given the surface where they won those titles, it is far from an atrocity.

The current slow surfaces benefit Ferrer's game just as much as that grass benefitted Goran and Krajicek, yet Ferrer hasn't even come close to sniffing a Slam title because he's simply not good enough no matter what kind of surface he's playing on.

There was a kind of conditions where players like Ivanisevic and Krajicek were as good as anyone else and could beat anyone, that kind of conditions simply doesn't exist for Ferrer. That's why those two deserve a Slam and Ferrer does not.
Mark Lenders is offline  
post #38 of 3984 (permalink) Old 08-26-2012, 02:42 AM
Registered User
 
BroTree123's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 19,164
                     
Re: Do you think this era will be remembered as a subpar era?

There is no era. It's a fiction.

It's just a way of making it easier to hate those who are dominating and those who fluke GS's

Quote:
Hian about himself
Quote:
No words can describe me.
Without me, it would be just aweso.
No shit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTwEeZi View Post
Never held a racquet in my life.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTwEeZi View Post
I've played the game for close to 10 years. This should come as no surprise to many.

Banned Users
BroTree123 is offline  
post #39 of 3984 (permalink) Old 08-26-2012, 02:43 AM
Registered User
 
ssj100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 662
                     
Re: Do you think this era will be remembered as a subpar era?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Lenders View Post
The new era seems to be weak though. Only two players under 25 years old have even made a Slam semifinal: Del Potro and Cilic. No other U-25 has been even particularly close to reach a semifinal so far.

This does not speak volumes of the strength of the new generation of players.
You could look at it in so many ways. You could easily say that not many U-25 players have made it to semi-finals in Grand Slams because the top 4 guys are too strong. Perhaps these U-25 players are just as good as Sampras/Agassi/Borg/McEnroe, but they are being over-shadowed by the top 4 guys and the depth of the competition has increased (hence explaining earlier round losses?). So again, you could argue that the "new" era is in fact stronger than ever.

It's difficult to know without transporting peak Sampras/Agassi/Borg/McEnroe into this current era - how can one scientifically prove that they will do well or not? Perhaps they may "just" be top 20 players and rarely make it into the semis of Grand Slams? Who really knows?

warm regards...

6-2, 6-3, 6-2 and 6-2, 6-2, 6-2 and 6-3, 6-0 (and not even finals).
ssj100 is offline  
post #40 of 3984 (permalink) Old 08-26-2012, 02:50 AM
Registered User
 
swisht4u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,532
                     
Re: Do you think this era will be remembered as a subpar era?

How do you determine a subpar ERA?

One way is how hard it is to win a slam, is it easier to win a slam now than in the past?

Just take players from the past and put them in today's field, how would they do?

On clay we have Nadal, Fed and Djokovic as stoppers.

On hards we have various players that can be dangerous besides Fed, Djokovic and Murray.

On grass we have Nadal, Fed and Djokovic guarding that one.

Players from the past would also have to upgrade their endurance without a doubt so that's one area they come up short in.


XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXÈ


Federer

Del Potro

Gulbis

Janowicz
swisht4u is offline  
post #41 of 3984 (permalink) Old 08-26-2012, 02:51 AM
Registered User
 
Mark Lenders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 17,675
                     
Re: Do you think this era will be remembered as a subpar era?

Quote:
Originally Posted by redshift36188 View Post
The system is not flawed. No one breaks the 5000 points barrier without being good. Ferrer is without a doubt among the 10 best players in the world.
It is clearly flawed. It allows players to get to the top by vulturing weak optional tournaments and then stay up there by enjoying the ridiculously high protection that the seeding system offers - really I struggle to think of a sport that protects its top players more than tennis.

For instance, Berdych has been crap ever since the clay season, yet he's under no threat to go below the top 8. The ranking and especially the seeding system in tennis lead to a hierarchy that's very hard to break.
Mark Lenders is offline  
post #42 of 3984 (permalink) Old 08-26-2012, 03:50 AM
Registered User
 
Matt01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 12,532
                     
Re: Do you think this era will be remembered as a subpar era?

Quote:
Originally Posted by abraxas21 View Post
With a 31 year old very-past-his-prime Federer dominating

Stopped reading at this point.


Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ Soup View Post
shit thread so far, I've lost the plot

Same here.

Nadal - Dimitrov - Wawrinka - Del Potro - Carreno Busta - Chardy - Cuevas


Quote:
Originally Posted by nolevolent View Post
Everything i said is right. Can't argue against it since I'm right. Just deal with it.
Matt01 is offline  
post #43 of 3984 (permalink) Old 08-26-2012, 04:08 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 580
                     
Re: Do you think this era will be remembered as a subpar era?

No era is as subpar one where a 31+ year old wins all four slams and numerous other titles in the same year (while beating younger players).
Benny_Maths is offline  
post #44 of 3984 (permalink) Old 08-26-2012, 04:25 AM
Registered User
 
ssj100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 662
                     
Re: Do you think this era will be remembered as a subpar era?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benny_Maths View Post
No era is as subpar one where a 31+ year old wins all four slams and numerous other titles in the same year (while beating younger players).
Except that the 31 year old is the GOAT? How about when 31 year old Agassi (or was he 32?) was world no. 1? Does that mean that era was even worse then?

warm regards...

6-2, 6-3, 6-2 and 6-2, 6-2, 6-2 and 6-3, 6-0 (and not even finals).
ssj100 is offline  
post #45 of 3984 (permalink) Old 08-26-2012, 04:55 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 580
                     
Re: Do you think this era will be remembered as a subpar era?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ssj100 View Post
Except that the 31 year old is the GOAT?
Except that's subjective? Except that in making that comment in this thread you've made many implicit assumptions? (Such as assuming the skill differential between that supposed GOAT and the players he beat is not greater than the skill differential between the top player of this era and the players he is superior to).

Quote:
How about when 31 year old Agassi (or was he 32?) was world no. 1? Does that mean that era was even worse then?
Irrelevant. There's no point in me engaging in this particular debate because I know exactly how it's going to go. I give whatever my opinion is and then we'll go in circles due to people not stating what their assumptions are. It boils down to people's own opinions and you can't 'prove' that someone else's opinion is 'wrong'.
Benny_Maths is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome