Originally Posted by Mountaindewslave
you're a clown trying to start a Nadal hate thread, but nonetheless:
Nadal would still dominate clay for obvious reasons, there were hardly any adept clay court players in the 90s (Courier and Muster were just not that good) up until the late 90s with Guga in particular.
Nadal would have many slams based on clay and many titles in general based on that
he might be able to squeeze in a hard court slam here or there given his work ethic (there are players with poorer hard court games than his, regardless of the court speed, who managed to win a random hard court grand slam in the 90s).
Wimbledon probably he would have no chance
a bunch of Roland Garros's, maybe a hard court slam, probably still very successful considering no matter what era (except maybe playing with Borg) Nadal would be essentially unstoppable on clay
Nadal may have snatched an AO. Other than that FO only. So he'd be on 8 slams by now at best.