LOL, but all of Federer's wins against Djokovic when he was just a little boy still count, right?
I'm loving the double standard
Lol at this. He reached number 3 in 2007 and has been very much in his prime since then.
And being a young developing player is better than being an old dude. The reason being that a young player although inexperienced still has quick movement which is something you don't have as you get older. Federer's movement is slow these days and Novak is very good at exposing that. So Federer's wins over a young Djokovic are more impressive than Djokovic's wins over a 30+ Federer.