Originally Posted by Serve&Volley01
Federer / Sampras the more naturally talented, offensive, and accomplished player but not very emotional and quiet to the media. Rarely shows emotion. He is boring
Djokovic/Agassi - much more lively and has a personality than Sampras. Probably a harder worker. Djokovic does his signature roar and double fist pump (like he is doing a sexual position) after a big win. Displays much more emotion on court than Murray or Federer.
Federer v. Djokovic: 17 vs 6
Sampras v. Agassi: 14 v. 8
Agassi was miles more popular than Sampras, at least to the younger tard crowd, but Federer today still seems to completely own Djokovic in popularity across the board in all age groups.
What do you think?
not a good comparison at all and FYI Djokovic has 5 slams. 17 VS 5 is much more dramatic than 14 VS 8
also Djokovic's not at as personable as Agassi. Federer and Sampras are not that similar really, Federer is a player with tons of variety, Sampras was a one-two punch kind of guy with big serve, big forehand/volleys
I see what you're getting at, as far as contrasting styles but Agassi/Sampras were the same generations and truly opposites. Djokovic is not really Federer's opposite nor is he the same generation
as far as comparing the players Fed/Samp Djok/Agassi there just aren't really that many similarities besides the first set had great serves/good on grass and the second set were good returners
the comparison doesn't work. also Federer is not boring like Sampras was
I don't think this comparison has any grounds to be honest