Originally Posted by Rafa = Fed Killa
1 GS win & 1 GS runnerup > 1 GS win & 0 GS runnerup
Still no logic ... Come on Fedtards I believe in you
Blimey gov'nor...are we going through this again?!
Let's look at it one more time: If we are going to measure the qualitative judgment of who is "better" on the quantifiable, namely tournament records, which seems to be what you want to do, then we cannot just compare the three slam tournaments they have played in when deciding who is the best player between the two in 2012.
We have to consider all the other tournaments as well. Obviously the other tournaments are not as important as the slams, but they still count. If they didn't, the players wouldn't bother with them. And Federer has 2 Masters titles, 2 ATP 500 titles, one slam and two slam semis. Surely this is a better achievement than Djokovic's 1 Masters title, one slam, one slam final and one slam semi. Surely we can agree that 1 Masters title and 2 ATP 500 titles are worth more than the difference between a slam final and slam semi?
Is it over yet?