Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious - Page 3 - MensTennisForums.com
View Poll Results: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event than for Roger?
Yes 15 22.06%
No 53 77.94%
Voters: 68. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #31 of 66 (permalink) Old 08-06-2012, 01:01 AM
Blown Out On the Trail
 
star's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 62,739
                     
Re: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious

Quote:
Originally Posted by PiggyGotRoasted View Post
Olympics is a glorified masters level event to me, its important in the fact a gold medal really matters to you and your country but in tennis its just not important in the grant scheme of things. I dont think it should be worth any atp ranking points either.
In the “grand scheme of things” nothing in tennis is important.
star is offline  
post #32 of 66 (permalink) Old 08-06-2012, 02:29 AM
Registered User
 
Matt01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 12,242
                     
Re: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious

Quote:
Originally Posted by MuzzahLovah View Post
Fed tards are so bitter they are a joke. Fed himself has said many times how important the Olympics are to him.

Please. He lost so he either must have been injured or didn't care.

Nadal - Dimitrov - Wawrinka - Del Potro - Carreno Busta - Chardy - Cuevas


Quote:
Originally Posted by nolevolent View Post
Everything i said is right. Can't argue against it since I'm right. Just deal with it.
Matt01 is offline  
post #33 of 66 (permalink) Old 08-06-2012, 02:37 AM
Banned!
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 10,825
                     
Re: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt01 View Post
Please. He lost so he either must have been injured or didn't care.
Hum...

Rafa was injured: go to excuse #1 for Rafatards

Nole did not really care: go to excuse #1 for Noletards to explain losses from the now deceased Nole 2.0.

How do you spell projection again?
BigJohn is offline  
post #34 of 66 (permalink) Old 08-06-2012, 02:41 AM
Registered User
 
LinkMage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Buenos Aires
Age: 30
Posts: 11,438
                     
Re: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious

The one who said he would trade Wimbledon for Olympic Gold

#18
LinkMage is offline  
post #35 of 66 (permalink) Old 08-06-2012, 02:48 AM
.
 
rocketassist's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 29,309
                     
Re: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mjau! View Post
Yes, Murray is an awful ambassador for the sport because he whines about out-of-competition drug testing and called Odesnik a 'snitch' for allegedly giving 'substantial assistance' to anti-doping authorities.

Bad manners too!
Odrugsnik is a fucking grass. Would you grass your mates up?

unbiased analyst extraordinaire
rocketassist is offline  
post #36 of 66 (permalink) Old 08-06-2012, 03:23 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 706
                     
Re: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt01 View Post
Please. He lost so he either must have been injured or didn't care.
What a troll you have become Matt .. still love you

That being said you should be more worried about Djokovic, 2011 Wimbledon Champion losing twice and getting no medals to Murray and Del Potro..


A service notice for Pete..

Little FEDERER, Roger (SUI) Versus Defending Wimbledon Champ Pete SAMPRAS (USA)
Year Tournament Round Surface Winner Score
2001 Wimbledon 16 Grass (O) R.FEDERER 7-6(7) 5-7 6-4 6-7(2) 7-5


Does he really believes this is the same Federer of then?
spencercarlos is offline  
post #37 of 66 (permalink) Old 08-06-2012, 03:29 AM
Registered User
 
The Prince's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 12,419
                     
Re: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious

Roger's loss is not the Olympic's loss.

The fact that Roger fought so hard to get to the final, and was very emotional about only getting silver, is the Olympic's gain.

EDIT: Just to clarify, the Olympic event gains from Roger and everyone else taking it seriously.
The Prince is offline  
post #38 of 66 (permalink) Old 08-06-2012, 03:33 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Age: 39
Posts: 117
                     
Re: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious

Olympics are great but the truth is there is nothing they can do to make it more important than it is now. It will never be as big of a deal as the majors.

Also I think in some ways Murray winning was better for tennis in general and the Olympics than Federer winning. Federer didn't really need the gold metal to prove anything, Murray did. He needed this to perhaps help him get over the hump at the majors and it was in London at Wimbledon. If he goes on to finally win Wimbledon in the next two years we will look back on this as a huge step toward that.
Cousin Oliver is offline  
post #39 of 66 (permalink) Old 08-06-2012, 08:41 AM
Registered User
 
ssj100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 662
                     
Re: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious

I think there are a couple of facts that make Olympic tennis a bit of a joke:
1. Federer has won Gold in the Doubles, but has never won a Doubles Grand Slam.
2. Murray (sure, he still can win a Grand Slam), and many other Olympic Singles Gold medallists has won Gold in the Singles, but has never won a Singles Grand Slam.

Surely that sums up the lack of prestige of Olympic tennis Gold in pure tennis terms? Perhaps in another 50-100 years, when there is more history created in tennis, the lack of the Gold medal in a tennis player's resume will be more significant. However, in most of our lifetimes', I don't see the Olympic tennis Gold medal as a significant title for a specific player, in pure tennis terms. Sure, it is a significant achievement for the player AND their country. But it doesn't make them a standout tennis player. Not right now anyway.

warm regards...

6-2, 6-3, 6-2 and 6-2, 6-2, 6-2 and 6-3, 6-0 (and not even finals).
ssj100 is offline  
post #40 of 66 (permalink) Old 08-06-2012, 08:48 AM
Registered User
 
DemiCrayanhan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 205
                     
Re: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious

peeps 8m americans watched serena win gold - i'm guessing andy trippled that number in GB...this is all good for our sport.

read/watch what fed says after his loss - you can tell he cares and is so proud with his silver. look at both delpo and fed after that semi. damn.

none of that changes the fact that olympics will never be the pinnacle of achievement for tennis players. grass was fun while it lasted. let's just move on to USO, shall we?

Roger Federer ~ Rafael Nadal

The Yin-Yang of Tennis

"Seemingly contrary forces which are not only interconnected and interdependent in the natural world, but only give rise to each other in turn."
DemiCrayanhan is offline  
post #41 of 66 (permalink) Old 08-06-2012, 08:49 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 4,593
                     
Re: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious

No.
paseo is offline  
post #42 of 66 (permalink) Old 08-06-2012, 08:51 AM
Registered User
 
ssj100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 662
                     
Re: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious

Add to that - I don't think Federer has even made the quarter-finals of a Doubles Grand Slam. In fact, when was the last time he actually played doubles in a Grand Slam or in a non-Davis cup tournament? He managed to win the doubles Gold (which some seem to think is at least nearly as important as a Grand Slam), and yet rarely plays doubles?

warm regards...

6-2, 6-3, 6-2 and 6-2, 6-2, 6-2 and 6-3, 6-0 (and not even finals).
ssj100 is offline  
post #43 of 66 (permalink) Old 08-06-2012, 09:08 AM
Registered User
 
TennisGrandSlam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hong Kong SAR, China
Age: 37
Posts: 1,665
                     
Re: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious

After Li Na had won Chinese first-ever Grand Slam Women's Singles title in French Open 2011, Li Yong Bo (Chinese badminton team head coach) said that French Open is JUST a ordinary tournament, it is NOT World Championship. Li Na MUST prove herself by winning Olympic Games.
TennisGrandSlam is offline  
post #44 of 66 (permalink) Old 08-06-2012, 09:10 AM
Registered User
 
TennisGrandSlam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hong Kong SAR, China
Age: 37
Posts: 1,665
                     
Re: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious

Quote:
Originally Posted by ssj100 View Post
I think there are a couple of facts that make Olympic tennis a bit of a joke:
1. Federer has won Gold in the Doubles, but has never won a Doubles Grand Slam.
2. Murray (sure, he still can win a Grand Slam), and many other Olympic Singles Gold medallists has won Gold in the Singles, but has never won a Singles Grand Slam.

Surely that sums up the lack of prestige of Olympic tennis Gold in pure tennis terms? Perhaps in another 50-100 years, when there is more history created in tennis, the lack of the Gold medal in a tennis player's resume will be more significant. However, in most of our lifetimes', I don't see the Olympic tennis Gold medal as a significant title for a specific player, in pure tennis terms. Sure, it is a significant achievement for the player AND their country. But it doesn't make them a standout tennis player. Not right now anyway.
Federer is a Silver Grand Slam (Singles) and Olympic Gold (Doubles) player
TennisGrandSlam is offline  
post #45 of 66 (permalink) Old 08-06-2012, 09:12 AM
Registered User
 
TennisGrandSlam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hong Kong SAR, China
Age: 37
Posts: 1,665
                     
Re: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious

Quote:
Originally Posted by LinkMage View Post
The one who said he would trade Wimbledon for Olympic Gold
Olympic Games happens once for four years.

Grand Slam happens four times for a year.

In some idoit fans claims, 1 Olympic Games = 16 Grand Slam
TennisGrandSlam is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome