Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious - Page 2 - MensTennisForums.com
View Poll Results: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event than for Roger?
Yes 15 22.06%
No 53 77.94%
Voters: 68. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #16 of 66 (permalink) Old 08-05-2012, 05:09 PM
Registered User
 
Aloevera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: In the state of euphoria
Posts: 455
                     
Re: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious

Quote:
Originally Posted by tennis_analyst View Post
I personally rank Olympics very highly, right after the four slams. That is, if you have none of these titles (as Murray didn't), you would rather win a slam, then the Olympics, then everythig else.

But for Federer, this was one significant title missing for his collection. I would trade his Wimbledon for this one, so I am so disappointed with his loss today.

I hope Rio 2016 is on hardcourts and Federer can prepare specifically for that event and not play too much before the Olympics.
No way. If I were him, I would never think about that. Not sure if I would even imagine to swap my gold medal in doubles for singles gold here.

Olympics is indeed special in its own way even without ranking points. There, any medal in any category counts just the same, because you're playing for national pride also. Federer is not known to be doubles specialist, but he took that gold medal in Beijing 2008 against Bryan Bros and Paes/Bhupathi, it's a great achievement and I would definitely treasure it.

I'm disappointed after such a big loss today, but it's crazy to swap a grand slam with Olympic Gold Medal. A very bad deal.

About Rio, I feel it's more possible to happen that he might reach Hingis again to consider playing mixed doubles there. But I'm not sure if this is realistic... I would like to see them playing together He might even skip singles to play mens doubles also.

Remember, any category counts and is equally important.
Aloevera is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #17 of 66 (permalink) Old 08-05-2012, 09:06 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 578
                     
Re: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious

Quote:
Originally Posted by tennis_analyst View Post
I personally rank Olympics very highly, right after the four slams. That is, if you have none of these titles (as Murray didn't), you would rather win a slam, then the Olympics, then everythig else.

But for Federer, this was one significant title missing for his collection. I would trade his Wimbledon for this one, so I am so disappointed with his loss today.

I hope Rio 2016 is on hardcourts and Federer can prepare specifically for that event and not play too much before the Olympics.
Not at all, imagine the inverse scenario. Federer would be standing at 16 slams still, not getting the number one ranking, still trailing Sampras in the # of Titles at Wimbledon trading Wimbledon with the Olimpics results.

Federer would be still slamless this year no less, sure the Olimpic gold is great, and they were great in 2008 doubles when he won, but it was winning an important event like the Usopen that really showed he was still there, the OG will never be up to the par to the Slams, and not even to the Masters Cup.

Federer got his medal in singles (already gold in doubles), but said that he was already exhausted mentally after the Del Potro match, it was just simply enough for him. I am sure he is pleased with the outcome.

A service notice for Pete..

Little FEDERER, Roger (SUI) Versus Defending Wimbledon Champ Pete SAMPRAS (USA)
Year Tournament Round Surface Winner Score
2001 Wimbledon 16 Grass (O) R.FEDERER 7-6(7) 5-7 6-4 6-7(2) 7-5


Does he really believes this is the same Federer of then?
spencercarlos is offline  
post #18 of 66 (permalink) Old 08-05-2012, 09:17 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,772
                     
Re: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious

Quote:
Originally Posted by tennis_analyst View Post
I personally rank Olympics very highly, right after the four slams. That is, if you have none of these titles (as Murray didn't), you would rather win a slam, then the Olympics, then everythig else.

But for Federer, this was one significant title missing for his collection. I would trade his Wimbledon for this one, so I am so disappointed with his loss today.

I hope Rio 2016 is on hardcourts and Federer can prepare specifically for that event and not play too much before the Olympics.
Trading his Wimbledon (hence the no.1 record), are you fucking crazy?
Lleyton_ is offline  
post #19 of 66 (permalink) Old 08-05-2012, 09:18 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 24,266
                     
Re: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious

Olympics is shit! It is a masters event that no one cares about. These people have to pretend they care about it. They cry here or there because let's face it, if you don't support your country, you become a villain.

SheepleBuster: Nikola Tesla of MTF ...Jesus of America - the Capitalist Crusader.. the Morning Star ... the Bringer of Light.

My Black List: InfiDULL, Gutless Federer

Suarez & Nadal : True Trailblazers in Sports
*Proud hater of the neo-L.Ron Hubbard of Espana, the fake Pharaoh without clothes ... cult leader extraordinaire and ...

Fact: George Washington did not lose to Nole in Wimbledon final
SheepleBuster is offline  
post #20 of 66 (permalink) Old 08-05-2012, 09:39 PM
Registered User
 
PiggyGotRoasted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 2,682
                     
Re: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious

Olympics is a glorified masters level event to me, its important in the fact a gold medal really matters to you and your country but in tennis its just not important in the grant scheme of things. I dont think it should be worth any atp ranking points either.
PiggyGotRoasted is offline  
post #21 of 66 (permalink) Old 08-05-2012, 09:47 PM
Registered User
 
swisht4u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,474
                     
Re: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious

This olympics was much more dramatic than any before IMO.

I'm sure Fed wanted this one badly, but he's been playing so much and going deep for about a year.
It was just too much physically and mentally, the whole house came crashing down on him today.
There was just nothing left, and Murray played a very motivated match.


XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXÈ


Federer

Del Potro

Gulbis

Janowicz
swisht4u is offline  
post #22 of 66 (permalink) Old 08-05-2012, 10:28 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,524
                     
Re: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious

Yes, Murray is an awful ambassador for the sport because he whines about out-of-competition drug testing and called Odesnik a 'snitch' for allegedly giving 'substantial assistance' to anti-doping authorities.

Bad manners too!
Mjau! is offline  
post #23 of 66 (permalink) Old 08-05-2012, 10:30 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 24,266
                     
Re: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mjau! View Post
Yes, Murray is an awful ambassador for the sport because he whines about out-of-competition drug testing and called Odesnik a 'snitch' for allegedly giving 'substantial assistance' to anti-doping authorities.

Bad manners too!
Don't worry. Olympics means nothing. Murray won the only thing he could possibly win. He is not going to win anything but masters. That's what he is. A masters specialist. If this event was 3 out of 5 from the get go, Murray would not win it.

SheepleBuster: Nikola Tesla of MTF ...Jesus of America - the Capitalist Crusader.. the Morning Star ... the Bringer of Light.

My Black List: InfiDULL, Gutless Federer

Suarez & Nadal : True Trailblazers in Sports
*Proud hater of the neo-L.Ron Hubbard of Espana, the fake Pharaoh without clothes ... cult leader extraordinaire and ...

Fact: George Washington did not lose to Nole in Wimbledon final
SheepleBuster is offline  
post #24 of 66 (permalink) Old 08-05-2012, 11:26 PM
Registered User
 
xargon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 870
                     
Re: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious

Quote:
Originally Posted by SheepleBuster View Post
Don't worry. Olympics means nothing. Murray won the only thing he could possibly win. He is not going to win anything but masters. That's what he is. A masters specialist. If this event was 3 out of 5 from the get go, Murray would not win it.
Yes, my thoughts exactly. This was bo3 and Murray has shown he can win those against Fed but as we all saw at WIM, bo5 is a different animal, hence, Murray's 0-4.

It's a nice ornament to keep in your trophy case and to celebrate but just having that and no GS is a no-brainer for tennis players.
Mecir, Dementieva, Rosset, Massu all have that one OG.

I consider Olympics to be like Davis Cup, just nice to have.
YEC is much more important IMHO.
xargon is offline  
post #25 of 66 (permalink) Old 08-05-2012, 11:31 PM
Registered User
 
xargon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 870
                     
Re: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mjau! View Post
Yes, Murray is an awful ambassador for the sport because he whines about out-of-competition drug testing and called Odesnik a 'snitch' for allegedly giving 'substantial assistance' to anti-doping authorities.

Bad manners too!
Here is the exact quote by Murray on PED's snitchers:
"You want to make sure that people who are fined and suspended aren't let off because they are telling on other players," the Times quoted Andy Murray, the No. 1-ranked player from Great Britain as saying. "That is snitching."
xargon is offline  
post #26 of 66 (permalink) Old 08-05-2012, 11:42 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,041
                     
Re: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious

Quote:
Originally Posted by tennis_analyst View Post
But for Federer, this was one significant title missing for his collection. I would trade his Wimbledon for this one, so I am so disappointed with his loss today.
No, IMHO, Federer wouldn't trade his most recent Wimbledon for an Olympic singles gold. Firstly, Wimbledon is a more prestigious title in tennis. Secondly, it offers more points. Thirdly, his most recent Wimbledon tied him with most ever. Yes, the singles gold is the only significant title missing from his collection but Federer knows the importance of his most recent Wimbledon title; and it's most historic than that of an Olympic gold.
stewietennis is offline  
post #27 of 66 (permalink) Old 08-06-2012, 12:01 AM
Registered User
 
branimir_iliev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 77
                     
Re: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious

Quote:
Originally Posted by SheepleBuster View Post
They cry here or there because let's face it, if you don't support your country, you become a villain.
This part especially. We're social creatures by nature (evolutionary biology). If you don't profess to love your fellow primates, you must be some kind of abomination. The Olympics have become simply the peaceful expression of tribalism and nationalism. They vaguely resemble the classical Olympics in ancient Greece in that sports and athletics become the safer conduit for the more sordid urges of city-states, which are namely xenophobia, greed and aggression. There were artistic events too of course, not just javelins and wrestling (simulations of certain wartime skills) and so forth but it was all a rehearsal for their repressed wartime fantasies and hostile feelings toward one another. Which is fine, I guess better that than actual bloodshed. But let's not talk about the Olympics as if it's about the big, happy brotherhood of man. It is about tribal competition, sectarianism, the symbolic yet safer expression of more sinister, darker impulses in man.

Now do we expect these athletes to say something other than how much they love the Motherland and still keep their public image intact? It would be suicide to do otherwise. So of course they'll wax poetically about how much they love their nations, with what zeal they are pursuing these games on behalf of the Fatherland, etc, this is all expected from the rest of the herd. But let's not be naive about their words...
branimir_iliev is offline  
post #28 of 66 (permalink) Old 08-06-2012, 12:03 AM
jrm
Registered User
 
jrm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 9,440
                     
Re: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious

i'm beginning to wonder how Federer achieved so much, in last two years he has become such a passive player (or maybe others are more aggressive)

Quote:
WISHLIST Robby GINEPRI Blaž KAVČIČ Michael LLODRA Feliciano LOPEZ Tomas BERDYCH Martin KLIZAN Julien BENNETEAU Novak DJOKOVIC Dmitry TURSUNOV Janko TIPSAREVIC Stanislas WAWRINKA Norbert GOMBOS Mikhail YOUZHNY Thomaz BELLUCCI Eduardo SCHWANK Benoit PAIRE Gilles MULLER Juan Martin del POTRO John ISNER Santiago GIRALDO Philipp PETZSCHNER Gilles SIMON Mardy FISH Grigor DIMITROV Florian MAYER
Quote:
HATE LIST Rafael NADAL Andy MURRAY Lleyton HEWITT Marcos BAGHDATIS Bernard TOMIC Fernando VERDASCO Dominic THIEM Nikolay DAVYDENKO Alexandr DOLGOPOLOV Fabio FOGNINI Borna CORIC Gael MONFILS Tommy HAAS Richard GASQUET Carlos BERLOCQ Ernests GULBIS Albert MONTANES Paolo LORENZI Vasek POSPISIL
jrm is offline  
post #29 of 66 (permalink) Old 08-06-2012, 12:05 AM
Registered User
 
MuzzahLovah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Age: 27
Posts: 20,100
                     
Re: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious

Fed tards are so bitter they are a joke. Fed himself has said many times how important the Olympics are to him.

http://www.menstennisforums.com/atta...8&d=1224521470

Emperor Nishikori- King of Comeback- Slayer of Demons- Champion of Tokyo- Conquistador of Barcelona
MuzzahLovah is offline  
post #30 of 66 (permalink) Old 08-06-2012, 12:07 AM
Registered User
 
Looner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 13,143
                     
Re: Was Federer's loss bigger loss for Olympic tennis event? Please, be serious

Quote:
Originally Posted by MuzzahLovah View Post
Fed tards are so bitter they are a joke. Fed himself has said many times how important the Olympics are to him.
You are so uniformed, it's sad. Fed also said he overhyped the event today. So, there.


The "Who plays tennis?" thread


Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocket Rod Laver
Roger is like a good red wine, he’s getting better with age.

Last edited by Looner; 08-06-2012 at 12:19 AM.
Looner is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome