Federer's won every Slam in which Nadal was omitted - MensTennisForums.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 16 (permalink) Old 08-03-2012, 09:31 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Backhand_Maestro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Murray Convert
Age: 27
Posts: 581
                     
Federer's won every Slam in which Nadal was omitted

Will the Olympics prove the same ?.

Bjorn Borg:

French Open W (1974, 1975, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981)

Wimbledon W (1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980)

3 Channel Slams; 4 Consecutive RG; 5 Consecutive SW19

GOAT
Backhand_Maestro is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 16 (permalink) Old 08-03-2012, 09:32 PM
Registered User
 
Li Ching Yuen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Down Low.
Posts: 5,250
                     
Re: Federer's won every Slam in which Nadal was omitted

Nadal hasn't lost a match while healthy, will the streak continue?
Li Ching Yuen is offline  
post #3 of 16 (permalink) Old 08-03-2012, 09:34 PM
Registered User
 
mystic ice cube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Age: 28
Posts: 1,140
                     
Re: Federer's won every Slam in which Nadal was omitted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Li Ching Yuen View Post
Nadal hasn't lost a match while healthy, will the streak continue?
LMAO

I love attacking tennis

FEDERER - DEL POTRO - DIMITROV
Tsonga Haas Nishikori Wawrinka
Cilic Djokovic Gulbis Kyrgios

Hewitt Soderling Roddick

mystic ice cube is offline  
post #4 of 16 (permalink) Old 08-03-2012, 09:35 PM
Registered User
 
PiggyGotRoasted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 2,682
                     
Re: Federer's won every Slam in which Nadal was omitted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Li Ching Yuen View Post
Nadal hasn't lost a match while healthy, will the streak continue?
Rep +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
PiggyGotRoasted is offline  
post #5 of 16 (permalink) Old 08-03-2012, 09:36 PM
Registered User
 
chenx15's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Age: 60
Posts: 2,034
                     
Re: Federer's won every Slam in which Nadal was omitted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Li Ching Yuen View Post
Nadal hasn't lost a match while healthy, will the streak continue?
too good... way too good

the Fed vs anderson IW 2014
Quote:
Originally Posted by SheepleBuster View Post
Fed ... don't F this up. You got the break. Just finish this. I got work tomorrow, I got kids... wife needs affection. Give me a break man.
chenx15 is offline  
post #6 of 16 (permalink) Old 08-03-2012, 09:51 PM
Registered User
 
Mountaindewslave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 11,939
                     
Re: Federer's won every Slam in which Nadal was omitted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Li Ching Yuen View Post
Nadal hasn't lost a match while healthy, will the streak continue?
you are obviously making fun BUT it's true that Nadal rarely loses when healthy. this is something that obviously will often occur with players who are frequently injured though.... they get injured, are gone for a while, come back again, peak, injure, leave... and all over again.

Nadal has been top player for many years now because he wins such a high percent of his matches when on, this is just common sense. and it's a fact you can correlate a lot of his shocking and big losses at big events to injury related problems. clearly he wasn't all there Wimbledon 2012, Australian Open 2011, Australia 2010, Roland Garros 2009/Wimbledon 2009 he didn't play, on and on

genuine harsh defeats include Del Potro 2009 US OPEN, Gonzalez Australia OPen 2007, Tsonga Australian Open 2008,and a handful of defeats by Djokovic in 2011.

the point? the point is that Nadal when 'in the zone' so to speak (which is quite a lot of the time), challenges for titles and typically comes very close to winning. clearly times of which he gets destroyed are typically ones in which he is not fully healthy, often nursing some sort of injuries.

the irony is that so many people on here over the years point out how Nadal has such a horrible game style prone to injuries, and when he finally begins to get injuries now and then, they call him a fluke or faker or whatever. completely illogical.

<3 Roger Federer <3 David Ferrer <3 Juan Martin Del Potro <3 Ernest Gulbis <3

------------------------ <3 Richard Gasquet <3

Rafael Nadal
Mountaindewslave is offline  
post #7 of 16 (permalink) Old 08-03-2012, 09:56 PM
Registered User
 
Li Ching Yuen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Down Low.
Posts: 5,250
                     
Re: Federer's won every Slam in which Nadal was omitted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mountaindewslave View Post
you are obviously making fun BUT it's true that Nadal rarely loses when healthy. this is something that obviously will often occur with players who are frequently injured though.... they get injured, are gone for a while, come back again, peak, injure, leave... and all over again.

Nadal has been top player for many years now because he wins such a high percent of his matches when on, this is just common sense. and it's a fact you can correlate a lot of his shocking and big losses at big events to injury related problems. clearly he wasn't all there Wimbledon 2012, Australian Open 2011, Australia 2010, Roland Garros 2009/Wimbledon 2009 he didn't play, on and on

genuine harsh defeats include Del Potro 2009 US OPEN, Gonzalez Australia OPen 2007, Tsonga Australian Open 2008,and a handful of defeats by Djokovic in 2011.

the point? the point is that Nadal when 'in the zone' so to speak (which is quite a lot of the time), challenges for titles and typically comes very close to winning. clearly times of which he gets destroyed are typically ones in which he is not fully healthy, often nursing some sort of injuries.

the irony is that so many people on here over the years point out how Nadal has such a horrible game style prone to injuries, and when he finally begins to get injuries now and then, they call him a fluke or faker or whatever. completely illogical.
Just the post that I was about to write but I didn't have time for it.
Li Ching Yuen is offline  
post #8 of 16 (permalink) Old 08-03-2012, 10:04 PM
country flag HKz
Hakeem
 
HKz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mesa
Posts: 5,234
                     
Re: Federer's won every Slam in which Nadal was omitted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mountaindewslave View Post
you are obviously making fun BUT it's true that Nadal rarely loses when healthy. this is something that obviously will often occur with players who are frequently injured though.... they get injured, are gone for a while, come back again, peak, injure, leave... and all over again.

Nadal has been top player for many years now because he wins such a high percent of his matches when on, this is just common sense. and it's a fact you can correlate a lot of his shocking and big losses at big events to injury related problems. clearly he wasn't all there Wimbledon 2012, Australian Open 2011, Australia 2010, Roland Garros 2009/Wimbledon 2009 he didn't play, on and on

genuine harsh defeats include Del Potro 2009 US OPEN, Gonzalez Australia OPen 2007, Tsonga Australian Open 2008,and a handful of defeats by Djokovic in 2011.

the point? the point is that Nadal when 'in the zone' so to speak (which is quite a lot of the time), challenges for titles and typically comes very close to winning. clearly times of which he gets destroyed are typically ones in which he is not fully healthy, often nursing some sort of injuries.

the irony is that so many people on here over the years point out how Nadal has such a horrible game style prone to injuries, and when he finally begins to get injuries now and then, they call him a fluke or faker or whatever. completely illogical.
*sees poster's name* *sees what they are quoting* definitely tl;dr

Federer / Haas / Safin / Gaudio / Kuerten / Youzhny / Nadal / Gonzalez / Ljubicic / Hewitt / Soderling / Wawrinka / Coria / Nalbandian / Kohlschreiber
HKz is offline  
post #9 of 16 (permalink) Old 08-03-2012, 10:16 PM
Registered User
 
PiggyGotRoasted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 2,682
                     
Re: Federer's won every Slam in which Nadal was omitted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mountaindewslave View Post
you are obviously making fun BUT it's true that Nadal rarely loses when healthy. this is something that obviously will often occur with players who are frequently injured though.... they get injured, are gone for a while, come back again, peak, injure, leave... and all over again.

Nadal has been top player for many years now because he wins such a high percent of his matches when on, this is just common sense. and it's a fact you can correlate a lot of his shocking and big losses at big events to injury related problems. clearly he wasn't all there Wimbledon 2012, Australian Open 2011, Australia 2010, Roland Garros 2009/Wimbledon 2009 he didn't play, on and on

genuine harsh defeats include Del Potro 2009 US OPEN, Gonzalez Australia OPen 2007, Tsonga Australian Open 2008,and a handful of defeats by Djokovic in 2011.

the point? the point is that Nadal when 'in the zone' so to speak (which is quite a lot of the time), challenges for titles and typically comes very close to winning. clearly times of which he gets destroyed are typically ones in which he is not fully healthy, often nursing some sort of injuries.

the irony is that so many people on here over the years point out how Nadal has such a horrible game style prone to injuries, and when he finally begins to get injuries now and then, they call him a fluke or faker or whatever. completely illogical.
tl/pd(Predicted Gibberish);dr
PiggyGotRoasted is offline  
post #10 of 16 (permalink) Old 08-03-2012, 10:18 PM
Registered User
 
Looner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 13,151
                     
Re: Federer's won every Slam in which Nadal was omitted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Li Ching Yuen View Post
Nadal hasn't lost a match while healthy, will the streak continue?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Li Ching Yuen View Post
Just the post that I was about to write but I didn't have time for it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HKz View Post
*sees poster's name* *sees what they are quoting* definitely tl;dr
Quote:
Originally Posted by PiggyGotRoasted View Post
tl/pd(Predicted Gibberish);dr
What a combo .


The "Who plays tennis?" thread


Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocket Rod Laver
Roger is like a good red wine, he’s getting better with age.
Looner is offline  
post #11 of 16 (permalink) Old 08-03-2012, 10:19 PM
Registered User
 
finishingmove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Age: 28
Posts: 22,889
                     
Re: Federer's won every Slam in which Nadal was omitted

Seems like a vulturish stat. No offense meant.

Nole CYGS 2015
Nole Golden Slam 2016
finishingmove is offline  
post #12 of 16 (permalink) Old 08-03-2012, 10:21 PM
Registered User
 
IOFH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Age: 25
Posts: 3,610
                     
Re: Federer's won every Slam in which Nadal was omitted

French Open 2004
IOFH is offline  
post #13 of 16 (permalink) Old 08-03-2012, 10:26 PM
.
 
rocketassist's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 28,860
                     
Re: Federer's won every Slam in which Nadal was omitted

Quote:
Originally Posted by IOFH View Post
French Open 2004
Correct, Nadal out injured.

Wonder how he'd have fared at that event.

unbiased analyst extraordinaire
rocketassist is offline  
post #14 of 16 (permalink) Old 08-03-2012, 10:33 PM
country flag HKz
Hakeem
 
HKz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mesa
Posts: 5,234
                     
Re: Federer's won every Slam in which Nadal was omitted

Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketassist View Post
Correct, Nadal out injured.

Wonder how he'd have fared at that event.
He would have done OK I suppose. Ironically, however, before his clay spree in 2005, he actually seemed to be a bit more effective on hardcourts, because of he used to rocket that forehand all day. Those two matches against Lleyton in Australia 2004/2005 were quite evident of his forehand power.

Federer / Haas / Safin / Gaudio / Kuerten / Youzhny / Nadal / Gonzalez / Ljubicic / Hewitt / Soderling / Wawrinka / Coria / Nalbandian / Kohlschreiber
HKz is offline  
post #15 of 16 (permalink) Old 08-03-2012, 10:34 PM
Registered User
 
sportstennis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 680
                     
Re: Federer's won every Slam in which Nadal was omitted

lol

Nadal "Sampras, Ivanisevic match. or one between those kind of players, is not enjoyable. It's not really tennis. it is a few swings of the racquet. For me in the past it was just serve. serve". arrogance.

clay excluded. successive win 0.  If grass and a hard are fast. Like Sampras era. Nadal is able to win only with clay. power of defense and muscles. boring ugly. All the surface is slow now.

fake time-out. cheat. gamesmanship. too noisy annoying always. excuse. boycotts threatened. always dissatisfaction cry complaints. dissatisfaction to schedule. selfish two-year ranking. bump to player. ugly protest. always exaggerated appeal of self condition. etc. overrated by fanatic arrogant blind fan
sportstennis is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome