How impressive is Nadal's 50-29 record vs. rest of top 4? - Page 5 - MensTennisForums.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #61 of 143 (permalink) Old 07-24-2012, 10:54 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 56
                     
Re: How impressive is Nadal's 50-29 record vs. rest of top 4?

It's very impressive but not as a H2H record, but rather as another testament of his clay court skills.
Choreos is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #62 of 143 (permalink) Old 07-24-2012, 11:03 PM
Registered User
 
sexybeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,633
                     
Re: How impressive is Nadal's 50-29 record vs. rest of top 4?

The question is not if claycourt matches should be taken away entirely but if he has played too many matches on clay against Federer and Djokovic (lets leave Murray out of this).

I mean 28 out of 61 matches on clay against his 2 greatest rivals means 46% of his matches against them has been on claycourt. Claycourts represent 25% of the tournaments on tour, so if this h2h would be fair he would not have almost half his matches on claycourts.

Imagine if Federer had half of his matches against Nadal/Djokovic on grass or indoor courts, how do you think the h2h would look like?

If Djokovic had half his matches against Nadal/Federer on slow hardcourt I think he would be leading both in the h2h.

All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.
sexybeast is offline  
post #63 of 143 (permalink) Old 07-24-2012, 11:05 PM
Registered User
 
Han Solo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Age: 39
Posts: 2,349
                     
Re: How impressive is Nadal's 50-29 record vs. rest of top 4?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash86 View Post
You're probably the only one who thinks that. 81 on clay is far more impressive. a) It's a lot more - 81 matches is a lot. b) That's over Masters. 500s, slams - lots of events, lots of players. Fed's are Halle and Wimbledon - winning best of 5 matches on grass at his peak wasn't that hard for him and an upset hard to pull off. That leaves winning Halle 5 years in a row - Nadal's won MC 8 years in a row - a best of 3 tournament; won Barcelona 5 yrs in a row too...

Both are great but the 81 on clay is more impressive.
Agreed. Both are insanely good stats for the two greatest players of recent times - I won't class Djokovic as up with them...yet.

But you can't fight the numbers - it's many more matches in his winning streak and shows that Nadal is just that much more dominant on his favourite surface than Fed is/was on grass. And Fed was really dominant...
Han Solo is offline  
post #64 of 143 (permalink) Old 07-24-2012, 11:06 PM
Registered User
 
IOFH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Age: 26
Posts: 3,610
                     
Re: How impressive is Nadal's 50-29 record vs. rest of top 4?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash86 View Post
You're probably the only one who thinks that. 81 on clay is far more impressive. a) It's a lot more - 81 matches is a lot. b) That's over Masters. 500s, slams - lots of events, lots of players. Fed's are Halle and Wimbledon - winning best of 5 matches on grass at his peak wasn't that hard for him and an upset hard to pull off. That leaves winning Halle 5 years in a row - Nadal's won MC 8 years in a row - a best of 3 tournament; won Barcelona 5 yrs in a row too...

Both are great but the 81 on clay is more impressive.
In general it's much easier to make a streak on a surface that rewards defense than offense be the margins are bigger. It's also easier to not lose over a 2-year span than 5-year one. As to the tournaments, 6(?) masters + 2 slams compared to 5 slams. Overall Fed's streak is more impressive I feel.
IOFH is offline  
post #65 of 143 (permalink) Old 07-24-2012, 11:10 PM
Registered User
 
Roy Emerson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,769
                     
Re: How impressive is Nadal's 50-29 record vs. rest of top 4?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Busterovic View Post
Obviously theres a direct correlation to this stat and winning slams since Murray has a dismal record in this department. Here is the rest of the top 4:

Federer: 33-38

Djokovic: 34-39

Murray: 18-29

To me Nadal's record is absolutely mind blowing. I realize that the majority of Nadal's wins are on clay and the fact that he isn't consistently playing these guys on hard courts is a knock on his game but this mark cannot be denied.

I for one thought that Nadal was done winning slams away from clay right after Djokovic eased to a 4 set win @ Wimbledon last year. Theres some support to this as its probably not well known but should be that Nadal has not won an AMS1000 event away from clay since March of 2009 at Indian Wells. Thats over a 40 month drought.

But theres no denying that to win slams its proven that you have to beat these guys and Nadal has shown that he can certainly do that. Again, I realize that Djokovic's record is not much worse than Murray's yet Nole is considered a living legend and Murray a bust so this stat doesn't tell the complete story but its definitely something to think about going forward and almost assures Nadal another slam or two.
Most wins are on clay. Tells me Nadal's best chances to win titles are on clay(RG). Specially after his 2 year drought off clay.
Roy Emerson is offline  
post #66 of 143 (permalink) Old 07-25-2012, 02:56 AM
Registered User
 
guga2120's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,151
                     
Re: How impressive is Nadal's 50-29 record vs. rest of top 4?

In any one on one sport you are judged by how you do against the best, not just numbers. So its very impressive.
guga2120 is offline  
post #67 of 143 (permalink) Old 07-25-2012, 03:26 AM
Registered User
 
habibko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Age: 30
Posts: 19,876
                     
Re: How impressive is Nadal's 50-29 record vs. rest of top 4?

doesn't tell us anything more than what we already know, he's usually fucked outside of clay

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Federer View Post
If I can help the game of tennis with the image or with making it more popular, that’s enough for me really. I want to leave the game better off than when I came into this great game
habibko is offline  
post #68 of 143 (permalink) Old 07-25-2012, 03:27 AM
Registered User
 
habibko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Age: 30
Posts: 19,876
                     
Re: How impressive is Nadal's 50-29 record vs. rest of top 4?

Quote:
Originally Posted by guga2120 View Post
In any one on one sport you are judged by how you do against the best, not just numbers. So its very impressive.
in tennis you are ultimately judged by what you achieve

being a top player-slayer means nothing if you can't achieve more than them

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Federer View Post
If I can help the game of tennis with the image or with making it more popular, that’s enough for me really. I want to leave the game better off than when I came into this great game
habibko is offline  
post #69 of 143 (permalink) Old 07-25-2012, 03:52 AM
Registered User
 
SaFed2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 5,385
                     
Re: How impressive is Nadal's 50-29 record vs. rest of top 4?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash86 View Post
You're probably the only one who thinks that. 81 on clay is far more impressive. a) It's a lot more - 81 matches is a lot. b) That's over Masters. 500s, slams - lots of events, lots of players. Fed's are Halle and Wimbledon - winning best of 5 matches on grass at his peak wasn't that hard for him and an upset hard to pull off. That leaves winning Halle 5 years in a row - Nadal's won MC 8 years in a row - a best of 3 tournament; won Barcelona 5 yrs in a row too...

Both are great but the 81 on clay is more impressive.
I agree with you that both are great stats BUT it's much easier to get upset on grass than on clay. A big server who can hit big has a much better chance of making a huge upset on grass than on clay. Think about the first round of Roland Garros last year where Isner took Nadal to 5. Had that been grass who knows... the upset would have been more likely. Upsets on clay is really not all that likely. Even Federer himself kept making the FO final over and over and over and losing to the greatest clay court player ever, Nadal himself.

If Nadal was not so damn amazing on clay we would most likely be looking at Federer with about 6 French Opens right now. Just putting things in perspective. Without Federer, Nadal still would not have any where close to 6 Wimby titles.

PAW Singles Ranking - 396
TITLES (TMS Rome 04', Rolland Garros 04', Wimbeldon 04')
RUNNER-UP (Rosmalen 04' US Open 04')
SaFed2005 is offline  
post #70 of 143 (permalink) Old 07-25-2012, 04:14 AM
the pirate queen.
 
Pirata.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: usa
Age: 28
Posts: 13,370
                     
Re: How impressive is Nadal's 50-29 record vs. rest of top 4?

Quote:
Originally Posted by RForever View Post
Oh, come one! The thread is about Rafa overall h2h, not with Fed. We have plenty of those already. His overall h2h is great, no doubt about it. He never chokes, fights for every ball, frustrates every opponent by forcing him to play extra ball (or ten extra balls) so no wonder he achieved it.
[youtube]NAEK8nl9njQ[/youtube]

Rafael Nadal & Novak Djokovic: The Evoulution of a Handshake
federer ferrer wawrinka raonic flopez istomin mannarino pospisil
verdasco

Quote:
Originally Posted by QuitYerWhining View Post
Ever trolled, ever failed, no matter.
Post again, troll again, troll harder.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clay Death View Post
mods drag this thread outside and have several spotted hyenas shit on it for 4 straight days. you may have to bribe the hyenas but they will shit on it.
Pirata. is offline  
post #71 of 143 (permalink) Old 07-25-2012, 06:10 AM
Faithful Txurigorri
 
Arkulari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Age: 31
Posts: 24,903
                     
Re: How impressive is Nadal's 50-29 record vs. rest of top 4?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sexybeast View Post
The question is not if claycourt matches should be taken away entirely but if he has played too many matches on clay against Federer and Djokovic (lets leave Murray out of this).

I mean 28 out of 61 matches on clay against his 2 greatest rivals means 46% of his matches against them has been on claycourt. Claycourts represent 25% of the tournaments on tour, so if this h2h would be fair he would not have almost half his matches on claycourts.

Imagine if Federer had half of his matches against Nadal/Djokovic on grass or indoor courts, how do you think the h2h would look like?

If Djokovic had half his matches against Nadal/Federer on slow hardcourt I think he would be leading both in the h2h.
This.

Rafa is a magnificent player and not a one-trick (aka clay) pony but it is certain that his resume is very clay heavy as some of his biggest wins are.

Rafael "The Matador of Spin" Nadal
Roger “The Magician of Precision” Federer
Del Potro, Ferrer, Haas, Zeballos


Arkulari is offline  
post #72 of 143 (permalink) Old 07-25-2012, 12:06 PM
Registered User
 
Matt01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,151
                     
Re: How impressive is Nadal's 50-29 record vs. rest of top 4?

Impressive stats.


Quote:
Originally Posted by habibko View Post
doesn't tell us anything more than what we already know, he's usually fucked outside of clay

If that is what you see in those stats then it's just a sad state of affairs.
Last time I checked, he won all different Slams on all different surfaces which is an impresive achievement as well.

Monaco - Del Potro - Nadal - Wawrinka - Robredo - Simon - Berdych - Dimitrov - Chardy


Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Kuerten View Post
Djokovic is the people's champion, Federer and Nadal are greedy thugs.
Matt01 is offline  
post #73 of 143 (permalink) Old 07-25-2012, 12:10 PM
Registered User
 
Looner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 13,226
                     
Re: How impressive is Nadal's 50-29 record vs. rest of top 4?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt01 View Post
Last time I checked, he won all different Slams on all different surfaces which is an impresive achievement as well.


The "Who plays tennis?" thread


Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocket Rod Laver
Roger is like a good red wine, he’s getting better with age.
Looner is offline  
post #74 of 143 (permalink) Old 07-25-2012, 12:13 PM
Registered User
 
Matt01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,151
                     
Re: How impressive is Nadal's 50-29 record vs. rest of top 4?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Looner View Post


Monaco - Del Potro - Nadal - Wawrinka - Robredo - Simon - Berdych - Dimitrov - Chardy


Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Kuerten View Post
Djokovic is the people's champion, Federer and Nadal are greedy thugs.
Matt01 is offline  
post #75 of 143 (permalink) Old 07-25-2012, 12:54 PM
Registered User
 
DrJules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,594
                     
Re: How impressive is Nadal's 50-29 record vs. rest of top 4?

Quote:
Originally Posted by guga2120 View Post
In any one on one sport you are judged by how you do against the best, not just numbers. So its very impressive.
But a head to head is a number of less importance than Grand Slam wins which is a measure of performance against the whole field.

The current greatness league of active players in order of achievements to date (a factual comparison rather than fan biased assessment):

Federer 17 GS, 6 Year End Masters, 24 Master Series.
Nadal 14 GS, 27 Master Series, 1 Olympic Gold.
Djokovic 9 GS, 4 Year End Masters, 24 Master Series.


DrJules is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome