Sapeod I agree with you.Murray is closer to Federer than ahy other player but still far from Roger. They both have very good hands and talent. The problem is in their head just sometimes they want to be more than perfect.It is good but it works against them.I love their matches and
Wimbeldon final this year was very high quality. But i can not say that about AO or US open Yes
there was drama but nothing more.
Federer is the greatest of all time, we've established that and its totally beyond arguing against at this point BUT....
Murray more talented than Djokovic and Nadal? Particularly Nadal? really? watch any match he plays with of them, his game is just not more talented. he doesn't have prettier or better shotmaking ability what Andy Murray has are really long legs and a great ability to hound around the court
Murray being the closest talent player to Federer... thought I had heard it all....
style wise none of the best players of the most recent generations are like Federer, but talent wise Murray would not be #2
EDIT::: actually to further elaborate, do me a favor Murray fans and do a search on youtube for a highlight reel of Murray's most talented and best shotmaking of his career. you will be shocked to find that his game just does not produce that much beautiful raw talent. do the same search for Federer, Nadal, even Djokovic and a lot more will pop up. it just is what it is, Murray is vastly overrated and nowhere near Roger's talent nor the best of the rest