Re: Of these guys, who was more dominant at the French Open?
It would have be to Lendl really. He won 3RG titles in 4 years from 1984-1987 (finishing as the runner-up in 1985), while Wilander never defended the RG title (he won 3 titles in 7 years). Guga won 3 titles in 5 years but never reached another SF at RG, while Courier won less titles/reached less finals.
Courier at his prime was excellent though. His title defence in 1992 is surely one of the most impressive grand slam title victories of the open era, given how easily he stormed through a difficult draw.
After Nadal and Borg, Lendl is clearly the next greatest player on the clay of the open era.
Last edited by LeChuck; 06-20-2012 at 01:06 AM.